Monchai Jitvisate1, James R T Seddon2. 1. Nanoionics, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Physics of Complex Fluids, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Differential capacitance is a key quantity in the understanding of electrical double-layer charging of electrolytes. However, experimental observations of ionic liquid systems are controversial, inconsistent, and often unable of confirming or refuting existing theories as well as highlighting discrepancies between the measurement techniques. We study the differential capacitance in both pure and dilute ionic liquids at room temperature. Using chronoamperometry to measure the differential capacitance of the liquids at a polycrystalline platinum electrode, we find good agreement between the measured capacitance curves and the extended mean-field model of Goodwin-Kornyshev [Goodwin, Z. A.; et al. Electrochim. Acta. 2017, 225, 190-197]. A crossover is found from the pure to the dilute regime, as shown by a transition from a camel-shape capacitance curve to a U-like one, together with a nonmonotonic dependence of capacitance with electrolyte concentration.
Differential capacitance is a key quantity in the understanding of electrical double-layer charging of electrolytes. However, experimental observations of ionic liquid systems are controversial, inconsistent, and often unable of confirming or refuting existing theories as well as highlighting discrepancies between the measurement techniques. We study the differential capacitance in both pure and dilute ionic liquids at room temperature. Using chronoamperometry to measure the differential capacitance of the liquids at a polycrystalline platinum electrode, we find good agreement between the measured capacitance curves and the extended mean-field model of Goodwin-Kornyshev [Goodwin, Z. A.; et al. Electrochim. Acta. 2017, 225, 190-197]. A crossover is found from the pure to the dilute regime, as shown by a transition from a camel-shape capacitance curve to a U-like one, together with a nonmonotonic dependence of capacitance with electrolyte concentration.
Room-temperature ionic liquids
have drawn huge attention recently due to their significant promise
for many applications, such as electrochemical energy-storage devices,
electrically tunable lubrication, high-temperature/vacuum material
synthesis, and novel self-assembly media.[1−4] The reason for excitement stems
from their material properties, which are of technological interest.
For example, ionic liquids have wide electrochemical window (ECW),
high ionic strength, high temperature stability, and low vapor pressure.[2,5,6] The development of ionic-liquid-based
energy devices, such as supercapacitors, requires an insightful understanding
of the electrical double-layer (EDL) charging mechanism, for which
the traditional (Gouy–Chapman) model appears inappropriate.[6−14] An important quantity related to EDL charging is the differential
capacitance, which represents the variation of the surface charge
with respect to the change of surface potential. It is one of the
key properties intensively studied in the field of ionic liquids,
from theoretical, numerical, and experimental aspects.[6−32] However, experimentally measuring the differential capacitance of
ionic liquids has proven to be a great challenge.[6,8−12,19−26]Previous studies have focused on two techniques—cyclic
voltammetry
(CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)—showing
that the liquids tend to exhibit complex responses due to their large,
bulky molecular dimensions. However, the data from these experiments
are inconsistent and often irreproducible.[6,8−12,19−26,30−32] In both cases,
the techniques themselves are most likely the causes of discrepancies,
for example, the assumption of negligible time dependence of capacitances
in CV and the validity of the equivalent circuit model and relevant
time scale in EIS.[10,11,28,29,33−37] Many EIS works have even adopted a single-frequency method, even
though it is known that a full-frequency spectrum should be recorded.[8,9,19−21,23−25] In short, neither of these techniques
provides a direct measurement of the differential capacitance of the
ionic liquids, and this disagreement has resulted in inconsistent
and confusing messages about the true nature of ionic liquids at electrified
electrodes, holding back theoretical advancement.In this study,
we measure the differential capacitance of ionic
liquids using the chronoamperometry (CA) technique, which allows direct
charge measurement and direct calculation of differential capacitance.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application to ionic
liquids. This technique thus gives us experimental access to the differential
capacitance without the need for unsupported or questionable assumptions.
We find good agreement with the mean-field model of Goodwin–Kornyshev,[13,14] which is based on that of Kornyshev,[7] extended by adding short-range ion correlations. Our results include
a transition of capacitance curves from camel shape to U-like shape
as the liquid is diluted, which is important for understanding the
nature of ionic liquids and developing real applications, where the
capacitance and other quantities, such as, electrode potential, viscosity,
liquid volume, and so on, need to be optimized.The ionic liquids
1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
([Emim]+ [BF4]−) (Sigma-Aldrich),
1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide ([Emim]+ [DCA]−), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
([Emim]+ [NTf2]−), and 1-buthyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−) (Merck Millipore) as well
as the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) were purchased with
purity of >99%. They were further purified at 150 °C under
vacuum
for >12 h. In this study, the measurements were done using a standard
three-electrode system. A 2 mm diameter polycrystalline platinum working
electrode (BASi) was cleaned by polishing on a polishing cloth (BUEHLER
micro cloth) with 0.3 μm alumina paste (BUEHLER Alpha micropolish
II), rinsed with Milli-Q water for several minutes, and dried with
nitrogen gas. The coiled platinum pseudoreference electrode and counter
electrode (>99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich), with surface areas greater
than
the working electrode, were cleaned by flaming in a hot butane flame
until glowing red and were immediately placed in cool Milli-Q water,
followed by drying with nitrogen gas. All electrodes and glass containers
were cleaned before each single measurement. The volume of the test
liquid in each measurement was 500 μL.CV and CA were
performed using a computer-controlled potentiostat
(CH-Instrument, CHI832B). Cyclic voltammograms were recorded separately
before the CA measurements for electrochemical window evaluation (Supporting Information). The open-circuit potential
(OCP) was measured and found to have values close to 0 V for all pure
ionic liquids but shifted when solvent was added. These OCPs were
chosen to be the initial potentials for CA measurements, as suggested
in the literature for high reproducibility.[8] The initial potential can lead to a hysteresis effect and irreproducible
results, as shown in the Supporting Information.We applied a step-function potential of 25 mV/step (∼kBT) to a polycrystalline platinum
electrode and measured the current density as a function of time.
For each potential step, the voltage was stepped back and forth 10
times between lower and higher potentials to minimize hysteresis effects.[38] The time duration for each step was 100 ms,
which was found to be long enough for the current to reach its steady
state (Supporting Information). The potential
scan was terminated when it reached the ECW limits. Then, all of the
electrodes and the container were cleaned and fresh liquid was replaced
for the new measurement in the opposite scan direction. The current
was measured with the sampling rate of 0.05 ms and the sensitivity
of 10–5 A/V. All chemical preparation and measurements
were carried out at 25 °C in an MBruan LABmaster glovebox filled
with a nitrogen atmosphere (water and oxygen <0.1 ppm). In total,
more than 1000 data set were recorded for the present work.We first present the measurement of differential capacitance in
pure ionic liquids [Emim]+ [BF4]−, [Emim]+ [DCA]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, and [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, which will allow comparison
between our results and those reported in the literature and the validation
of our method and data with the theoretical model of Goodwin–Kornyshev.[13,14] An example of the potential waveform and the corresponding measured
current is shown in Figure a. The current shows excellent agreement when fitted with
the exponential equation, j = a exp
(−t/τ), where j is
the current density and t is time (Supporting Information). The fitting parameters a and τ are used for the calculation of the charge density.
It is clear that the current reaches its equilibrium within the measured
time duration, with the exponential fit indicating that the charging
mechanism obeys a normal diffusive charging process.[39] In principle, τ represents the characteristic charging
time constant, which is defined as τ = RC,
where R is the resistance of the bulk liquid and C is the double-layer capacitance. We find in our study
that τ has an average value between 0.1 and 0.5 ms (Supporting Information), which is in the same
range of the fast time scale measured with EIS, representing the diffusive
charging mechanism.[12] The measured time
scales have a trend corresponding to the conductivity of the ionic
liquids; the higher conductivity liquids have a shorter time constant,
as expected.[40] We do not observe the slow
time scale () of the EIS experiments,
which is likely
caused by the roughness of our (polycrystalline) electrode surface.
This slow process is interpreted as originating from ion reorientation,
which occurs at the level of the compact ion layers on the electrode
rather than the diffuse layer; therefore, it is more pronounced on
smooth/crystalline electrodes and is most likely suppressed on polycrystallineplatinum.[12,31]
Figure 1
(a) Example of step-function potential and corresponding
measured
charging current. (b) Potential-dependent charge density of pure ionic
liquids [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [BF4]−, and [Emim]+ [DCA]− determined from the charging current.
(a) Example of step-function potential and corresponding
measured
charging current. (b) Potential-dependent charge density of pure ionic
liquids [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [BF4]−, and [Emim]+ [DCA]− determined from the charging current.The potential-dependent surface
charge densities, σ, of the
studied ionic liquids on platinum (Figure b) are the results of the cumulative summation
of the charge density at each potential step, that is, , where a and τ are obtained from
∫0j dt (t′ = 100 ms) of the ith potential step. The
differential capacitance per unit area, C, then can
be calculated directly by differentiating the surface charge density
with respect to the electrode potential, following the definition[39]where V is the electrode
potential, T is the temperature, and μ is the
chemical potential.The resulting capacitance curves are then
fitted with the mean-field
model of Goodwin–Kornyshev, where the short-range ion correlations
are taken into account, which can be written aswhere C̃0 is a rescaled Debye capacitance, α is a rescaled
parameter
accounting for ion correlations, having values <1 (α = 1
recovers the case of zero short-range ion correlations), u0 = eV/kBT, and γ is an ion fraction defined as the
ratio of the total number of ions to the total number of sites available
for them. The reader can find the detailed derivation of the model
in the original paper of Goodwin et al.[13,14] In the asymmetric
case where the cation and anion are not of equivalent geometry, γ
is defined as follows[7,13]where γ+ and γ– are the ion fractions for cations and anions, respectively.The capacitances of the ionic liquids [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [BF4]−, and [Emim]+ [DCA]− are
plotted in Figure , together with the fits obtained from eq . Clearly, we see the capacitance curves reveal
the predicted camel-shape behavior and the model fits our experimental
data well.
Figure 2
(a–d) Differential capacitance of pure ionic liquids [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [BF4]−, and [Emim]+ [DCA]−, respectively, with the solid lines representing the fits from the
extended mean-field model.
(a–d) Differential capacitance of pure ionic liquids [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [BF4]−, and [Emim]+ [DCA]−, respectively, with the solid lines representing the fits from the
extended mean-field model.The rescaled parameter, α, in pure ionic liquids is
found
to have the value of ∼0.06, which is far from 1 expected for
the case of no ion–ion correlation, indicating that ion–ion
repulsion dominates ion-pairing in ionic liquids. However, we cannot
compare this result with other measurements because, to the best of
our knowledge, this is the first attempt to extract this model parameter
from experimental data. The ion fractions (γ+, γ–) for an asymmetric ionic liquids have been obtained
from the fit, with values in the typically predicted range of 0.4
to 0.1 (Supporting Information). These
double-humped capacitance curves, which are different from the classical
Gouy–Chapman theory, have been previously measured in the literature
with the EIS technique but are often hidden in a “forest of
peaks” and rarely fit the theory well.[9,12,16,25,31] The qualitative agreement of our experimental data
with the theoretical model and the quantitative agreement with many
experimental observations from the EIS technique, supports the validity
of our approach.We note that the model shows better agreement
in the liquids with
molecules of smaller size and more simple shape (Figure c,d) than in the liquids having
larger and more complex molecular geometries (Figure a,b). In the particular case of [Emim]+ [BF4]−, which has simplest molecular
shapes among the liquids studied, the anions are spherical and substantially
smaller than the cations, leading to a higher and steeper capacitance
peak at positive polarization than at negative polarization. This
behavior is described as a higher local ion concentration in the anion-rich
region due to smaller anion sizes.[7,16,18] However, this semiempirical explanation fails for
the other liquids whose molecules are much less spherical (an assumption
of the model).[13,14] It is clear that the mean-field
theory is limited here insofar as it does not take into account specific
molecular geometries.[7,13,14]The Debye capacitance (C0), as
described
by the mean-field model, is related to the electrostatic screening
length, a characteristic length scale defined in the classical theory
as the Debye length, λD, by the relation C0 = ϵϵ0/λD, where ϵ is the dielectric constant of
the medium and ϵ0 is the permittivity of free space.
By using the low-frequency bulk dielectric constant of the ionic liquids
(Supporting Information) and the capacitance
values at the PZC (CPZC) from our measurements
of 5.8, 6.6, 7.5, and 7.5 μF/cm2, we find screening
lengths of about 1.9, 1.6, 1.3, and 1.5 nm for [C4mpyr]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, [Emim]+ [DCA]−, and [Emim]+ [BF4]−, respectively.
These screening lengths are ∼30 times larger than those calculated
using classical definition of the Debye length, and are about 10 times
larger than the rescaled screening length, λ̃D = λD/√α, calculated using the rescaled
factor (α) obtained from the experimental data (Supporting Information). Long screening lengths
in pure ionic liquids have been observed in force measurements and
are explained as being caused by a low concentration of effective
free ions in the liquids.[41−44] However, the extent of ion pairing and dissociation
is currently still a highly debated topic, and the final conclusion
is not yet clear. This, in turn, affects physical interpretation of
the fitting parameter, α, whose value is directly related to
ion correlations.[13,14] Therefore, this interpretation
may not be the case for our findings.It must also be emphasized
here that the measured capacitance is
technically the total capacitance, that is, the combination of the
Stern/compact layer and diffuse layer capacitances. As a result, the
values of the measured capacitance at the PZC cannot be compared directly
to the Debye capacitance, C0, of the mean-field
model without the knowledge of the compact layer capacitance. It could
be that the capacitance measured in pure ionic liquids has a more
significant contribution from the Stern capacitance rather than the
Debye capacitance. The formation of liquid layers next to the charged
surfaces is supported by X-ray reflectivity,[45] atomic force microscopy (AFM),[46] and
surface force apparatus (SFA) experiments,[47] but the layer-by-layer co/counterion densities are unknown.Now that we have validated our experimental approach, we move on
to study the differential capacitance in dilute ionic liquid by adding
the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to the ionic liquid [Emim]+ [NTf2]−, which forms miscible
mixtures in a full range of the studied concentrations. The same CA
procedure is applied for measuring the differential capacitance, and
the results are shown in Figure . By varying the composition of the mixtures, we observe
a clear transition from the pure to dilute regimes, as can be seen
by a crossover of the capacitance curves from a camel shape to a U-like
shape (Figure a),
as predicted by the mean-field models.[7,13,14] This crossover occurs between the concentration of
1 and 0.01 M, where the slope of the capacitance is steeper in the
lower concentration mixtures, indicating a classical dilute electrolyte
character. The mean-field model fitted to the experimental data shows
good agreement (Figure b–e), especially within ±(0.5 to 1) V potential window
from the PZC (Supporting Information),
indicating the validity of the model and the importance of the short-range
interaction effect added to it. The trend of the ion fraction (γ)
values is found to decrease (from ∼0.4 to ∼0.1) when
more solvent is added to the ionic liquid (Supporting Information), resulting from the decrease in ion concentration.
The parameter α is found to increase as the ion concentration
decreases, as expected when the ion correlations are diminished by
dilution.
Figure 3
(a) Differential capacitance of [Emim]+ [NTf2]−/DMSO mixtures at different concentrations showing
a crossover from camel-shape curves in dense concentrations to U-like
curves in dilute regime. (b–e) Differential capacitance plotted
together with the fits from the mean-field model at varied concentrations.
(a) Differential capacitance of [Emim]+ [NTf2]−/DMSO mixtures at different concentrations showing
a crossover from camel-shape curves in dense concentrations to U-like
curves in dilute regime. (b–e) Differential capacitance plotted
together with the fits from the mean-field model at varied concentrations.The capacitance at the PZC is
found to change nonmonotonically
with concentration (Supporting Information). However, calculating λD from CPZC without knowledge of the compact layer capacitance
leads to discrepancies between λD measured here and
the screening length from surface force measurement (Supporting Information).In conclusion, we measured
the differential capacitance of solvent-free
and dilute ionic liquids using the CA technique and we find quantitative
agreement between our direct capacitance measurement and the extended
mean-field model of Goodwin–Kornyshev and qualitative agreement
with several of the EIS experiments. Our measurements are a good indication
of the validity of the model. The capacitances measured in the pure
ionic liquids in our study show camel-shape curves, as predicted by
the models for moderate-packing ionic liquids, and the capacitances
at the PZC are likely to relate to the compact layer capacitance rather
than the diffuse layer capacitance.Furthermore, crossover from
camel to U-like capacitance curves
is observed when solvent is added to the ionic liquids. A nonmonotonic
dependence of the capacitance at the PZC with the concentration is
found, similar to another independent study.[48] However, quantitative conclusion cannot be made based only on the
mean-field model due to lack of knowledge of the compact layer capacitance,
which requires further theoretical studies or simulations.Our
observations provide important information for a wide range
of uses, from theoretical model improvement to practical/technical
implementation. In particular, we see relevance in the development
of energy-storage device applications, where the energy density and
power density have to be optimized.The situation is expected
to be more complicated in the case of
nonmetallic electrodes, such as glassy carbon, graphite, or graphene,
where the density of states (DOF) of the electrode material is limited
and the electrode capacitance can have a dramatic effect on the measured
capacitance,[48−51] but for metal electrodes, direct application of the Goodwin–Kornyshev
analytical model is satisfactory.
Authors: David J Bozym; Betül Uralcan; David T Limmer; Michael A Pope; Nicholas J Szamreta; Pablo G Debenedetti; Ilhan A Aksay Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 6.475