Literature DB >> 29255690

Fractional flow reserve computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Shaw Hua Kueh1, Matthew Boroditsky2, Jonathon Leipsic1,3.   

Abstract

Amongst patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), less than a third of patients have obstructive disease on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fewer still have flow-limiting obstructive disease as determined by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). FFR is a powerful tool in guiding revascularization of flow-limiting lesions which in turn improves clinical outcome in those with haemodynamically significant obstructive disease. However FFR is infrequently performed due to the cost, time and patient discomfort the procedure entails. Further advances in non-invasive imaging has allowed FFR to be derived non-invasively by applying computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling to the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) dataset without the need to induce hyperemia or modify the standard CCTA acquisition protocol. FFR derived from CCTA has been shown to have excellent correlation with invasive FFR and remains diagnostically robust in presence of reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), coronary calcification and motion artifact. More recently, new data have emerged evaluating the clinical impact of fractional flow reserve computed tomography (FFRCT) on the assessment and management of patients with stable chest pain. One such study is the Prospective LongitudinAl trial of FFRCT: Outcome and Resource IMpacts (PLATFORM) study which showed an improved patient selection for ICA using CCTA-FFRCT approach by increasing the likelihood of identifying obstructive CAD at ICA amongst those intended for invasive testing. CCTA-FFRCT may therefore serve as efficacious gatekeeper to ICA that enriches the ICA population. The utility of FFRCT has also helped deepened our understanding of CAD. Through CFD modeling, it is now recognized that there are mechanistic forces of wall shear stress (WSS) and axial plaque force acting on coronary plaques. This has created further interest in exploring the possible interplay between these mechanistic forces on the development of coronary plaque and vulnerability of these plaques to rupture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR); coronary angiography; coronary artery disease (CAD)

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255690      PMCID: PMC5716947          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.01.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  52 in total

1.  Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.

Authors:  James K Min; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Farouc A Jaffer; Jonathon Leipsic; Martin B Leon; G B John Mancini; Laura Mauri; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-08-07

2.  Coronary Artery Axial Plaque Stress and its Relationship With Lesion Geometry: Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Gilwoo Choi; Joo Myung Lee; Hyun-Jin Kim; Jun-Bean Park; Sethuraman Sankaran; Hiromasa Otake; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Charles A Taylor; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 3.  Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure.

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Bernard De Bruyne; Gianluca Pontone; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Mark A Hlatky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Jun-Bean Park; Gilwoo Choi; Eun Ju Chun; Hyun Jin Kim; Jonghanne Park; Ji-Hyun Jung; Min-Ho Lee; Hiromasa Otake; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Bernard De Bruyne; Charles A Taylor; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hyung-Bok Park; Ran Heo; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Iksung Cho; Heidi Gransar; Ryo Nakazato; Jonathon Leipsic; G B John Mancini; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hiromasa Otake; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Andrejs Erglis; Hyuk-Jae Chang; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01

8.  Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Heidi Gransar; Millie J Gomez; Jonathon Leipsic; Hyung-Bok Park; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study).

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Kaleab N Asrress; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ricardo Petraco; Iqbal S Malik; Rodney A Foale; Ghada W Mikhail; Nicolas Foin; Christopher Broyd; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Amarjit Sethi; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood A Khan; Muhammed Z Khawaja; Christopher S Baker; Michael Bellamy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Simon Redwood; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Datasets: The Next Frontier in Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Caroline Ball; Gianluca Pontone; Mark Rabbat
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.