Literature DB >> 26033981

Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure.

Tim P van de Hoef1, Maria Siebes2, Jos A E Spaan2, Jan J Piek3.   

Abstract

Wide attention for the appropriateness of coronary stenting in stable ischaemic heart disease (IHD) has increased interest in coronary physiology to guide decision making. For many, coronary physiology equals the measurement of coronary pressure to calculate the fractional flow reserve (FFR). While accumulating evidence supports the contention that FFR-guided revascularization is superior to revascularization based on coronary angiography, it is frequently overlooked that FFR is a coronary pressure-derived estimate of coronary flow impairment. It is not the same as the direct measures of coronary flow from which it was derived, and which are critical determinants of myocardial ischaemia. This review describes why coronary flow is physiologically and clinically more important than coronary pressure, details the resulting limitations and clinical consequences of FFR-guided clinical decision making, describes the scientific consequences of using FFR as a gold standard reference test, and discusses the potential of coronary flow to improve risk stratification and decision making in IHD. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary flow; Coronary flow reserve; Coronary pressure; Fractional flow reserve; Ischaemic heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033981     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  41 in total

1.  Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Csilla Celeng; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison between minimum lumen cross-sectional area and intraluminal ultrasonic intensity analysis using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Hironori Takami; Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshitaka Muraoka; Toshiya Miura; Akiyoshi Shimizu; Reo Anai; Yoshinori Sanuki; Tetsu Miyamoto; Yasushi Oginosawa; Yoshihisa Fujino; Yuki Tsuda; Masaru Araki; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Hold off on that shot of Java: more evidence that caffeine intake leads to false negative adenosine stress myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Tim Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Intracoronary pressure measurement differences between anterior and posterior coronary territories.

Authors:  T Härle; S Meyer; W Bojara; F Vahldiek; A Elsässer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Performing and Interpreting Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Document.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Tanja Rudolph; Johannes Rieber; Holger Eggebrecht; Gert Richardt; Thomas Schmitz; Nikos Werner; Florian Boenner; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  Assessing the Haemodynamic Impact of Coronary Artery Stenoses: Intracoronary Flow Versus Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Valérie E Stegehuis; Gilbert Wm Wijntjens; Tadashi Murai; Jan J Piek; Tim P van de Hoef
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-08

9.  Integrated Noninvasive Physiological Assessment of Coronary Circulatory Function and Impact on Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Viviany R Taqueti; Tim P van de Hoef; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Paco E Bravo; Venkatesh L Murthy; Michael T Osborne; Sara B Seidelmann; Tomas Vita; Courtney F Bibbo; Meagan Harrington; Jon Hainer; Ornella Rimoldi; Sharmila Dorbala; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein; Paolo G Camici; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  P Meimoun; J Clerc; D Ardourel; U Djou; S Martis; T Botoro; F Elmkies; H Zemir; A Luycx-Bore; J Boulanger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.