Literature DB >> 21930103

Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.

James K Min1, Daniel S Berman, Matthew J Budoff, Farouc A Jaffer, Jonathon Leipsic, Martin B Leon, G B John Mancini, Laura Mauri, Robert S Schwartz, Leslee J Shaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) allows for noninvasive identification of anatomic coronary artery disease (CAD) severity but does not discriminate whether a stenosis causes ischemia. Computational fluid dynamic techniques applied to CTA images now permit noninvasive computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischemia, but the diagnostic performance of computed FFR (FFR(CT)) as compared with measured FFR at the time of invasive coronary angiography remains unexplored.
OBJECTIVE: We determined the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive FFR(CT) for the detection and exclusion of ischemia-causing stenoses.
METHODS: DeFACTO (NCT01233518) is a prospective, international, multicenter study of 238 patients designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFR(CT) for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses identified by CTA, compared with invasive FFR as a reference standard. FFR values ≤ 0.80 will be considered hemodynamically significant. Patients enrolled in the DeFACTO study will undergo CTA, invasive coronary angiography, and 3-vessel FFR in the left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, and right coronary artery distributions. FFR(CT) will be computed with acquired CTA images, without modification to CTA image acquisition protocols and without additional image acquisition. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for CTA, invasive coronary angiography, FFR, and FFR(CT).
RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the DeFACTO study is the per-patient diagnostic accuracy of FFR(CT) for noninvasive assessment of the hemodynamic significance of CAD, compared with FFR during invasive coronary angiography as a reference standard. The secondary endpoints include additional per-patient as well as per-vessel diagnostic performance characteristics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
CONCLUSION: The DeFACTO study will determine whether the addition of FFR(CT) to conventional CTA improves the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930103     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  33 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Coronary CT angiography: Beyond morphological stenosis analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

4.  320-row CT coronary angiography predicts freedom from revascularisation and acts as a gatekeeper to defer invasive angiography in stable coronary artery disease: a fractional flow reserve-correlated study.

Authors:  Brian S Ko; Dennis T L Wong; James D Cameron; Darryl P Leong; Michael Leung; Ian T Meredith; Nitesh Nerlekar; Paul Antonis; Marcus Crossett; John Troupis; Richard Harper; Yuvaraj Malaiapan; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Early resting myocardial computed tomography perfusion for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Amit Pursnani; Ashley M Lee; Thomas Mayrhofer; Waleed Ahmed; Shanmugam Uthamalingam; Maros Ferencik; Stefan B Puchner; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; James Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yabin Wang; Heye Zhang; Youbing Yin; Kunlin Cao; Zhifan Gao; Huafeng Liu; William Kongto Hau; Lei Gao; Yundai Chen; Feng Cao; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  CT coronary angiography at an ultra-low radiation dose (<0.1 mSv): feasible and viable in times of constraint on healthcare costs.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Teresa Arcadi; Onofrio Catalano; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Coronary lesion characteristics with mismatch between fractional flow reserve derived from CT and invasive catheterization in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Osawa; Toru Miyoshi; Takashi Miki; Yuji Koide; Yusuke Kawai; Kentaro Ejiri; Masatoki Yoshida; Shuhei Sato; Susumu Kanazawa; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Non-invasive functional assessment using computed tomography: when will they be ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Yeonyee E Yoon; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 10.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.