Literature DB >> 29254878

The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Item development and qualitative validation.

B B Brodey1, J Addington2, M B First3, D O Perkins4, S W Woods5, E F Walker6, B Walsh7, J M Nieri8, M B Nunn9, J Putz10, I S Brodey11.   

Abstract

A panel of experts assembled and analyzed a comprehensive item bank from which a highly sensitive and specific early psychosis screener could be developed. Twenty well-established assessments relating to the prodromal stage, early psychosis, and psychosis were identified. Using DSM-5 criteria, we identified the core concepts represented by each of the items in each of the assessments. These granular core concepts were converted into a uniform set of 490 self-report items using a Likert scale and a 'past 30days' time frame. Partial redundancy was allowed to assure adequate concept coverage. A panel of experts and TeleSage staff rated these items and eliminated 189 items, resulting in 301 items. The items were subjected to five rounds of cognitive interviewing with 16 individuals at clinically high risk for psychosis and 26 community mental health center patients. After each round, the expert panel iteratively reviewed, rated, revised, added, or deleted items to maximize clarity and centrality to the concept. As a result of the interviews, 36 items were revised, 52 items were added, and 205 items were deleted. By the last round of cognitive interviewing, all of the items were clearly understood by all participants. In future work, responses to the final set of 148 items and machine learning techniques will be used to quantitatively identify the subset of items that will best predict clinical high-risk status and conversion.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAARMS; NAPLS; PQ-B; Prodromal; Psychosis;; SIPS; Schizophrenia; Screener

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29254878      PMCID: PMC6003837          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  13 in total

1.  Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B).

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Rahel Pearson; Sophia Vinogradov; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Specificity of Incident Diagnostic Outcomes in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Jadon R Webb; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Robert K Heinssen; Larry J Seidman; Sarah I Tarbox; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Prodromal psychosis screening in adolescent psychiatry clinics.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Sebastian Therman; Marko Manninen; Matti O Huttunen; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): overview and recruitment.

Authors:  Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Barbara A Cornblatt; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Jack A Addington; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Carrie E Bearden; Jennifer K Johnson; Adrian Raine; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population.

Authors:  Helga K Ising; Wim Veling; Rachel L Loewy; Marleen W Rietveld; Judith Rietdijk; Sara Dragt; Rianne M C Klaassen; Dorien H Nieman; Lex Wunderink; Don H Linszen; Mark van der Gaag
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Basic symptoms and psychotic symptoms: their relationships in the at risk mental states, first episode and multi-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anna Comparelli; Antonella De Carolis; Emanuele Emili; Silvia Rigucci; Ilaria Falcone; Valentina Corigliano; Martina Curto; Giada Trovini; Julia Dehning; Giorgio D Kotzalidis; Paolo Girardi
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 8.  Psychosis risk screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; M Cappucciati; G Rutigliano; T Y Lee; Q Beverly; I Bonoldi; J Lelli; S J Kaar; E Gago; M Rocchetti; R Patel; V Bhavsar; S Tognin; S Badger; M Calem; K Lim; J S Kwon; J Perez; P McGuire
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2016-05-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Screening of the college students at clinical high risk for psychosis in China: a multicenter epidemiological study.

Authors:  Jiaxin Wu; Xiangyun Long; Fei Liu; Ansi Qi; Qi Chen; Xiaofeng Guan; Qiong Zhang; Yuhong Yao; Jingyu Shi; Shiping Xie; Wei Yan; Maorong Hu; Xin Yuan; Jun Tang; Siliang Wu; Tianhong Zhang; Jijun Wang; Zheng Lu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.630

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.