Literature DB >> 21511440

Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B).

Rachel L Loewy1, Rahel Pearson, Sophia Vinogradov, Carrie E Bearden, Tyrone D Cannon.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the preliminary concurrent validity of a brief version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-B), a self-report screening measure for psychosis risk syndromes. Adolescents and young adults (N=141) who presented consecutively for clinical assessment to one of two early psychosis research clinics at the University of California, San Francisco and UC Los Angeles completed the PQ-B and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) at intake. Endorsement of three or more positive symptoms on the PQ-B differentiated between those with prodromal syndrome and psychotic syndrome diagnoses on the SIPS versus those with no SIPS diagnoses with 89% sensitivity, 58% specificity, and a positive Likelihood Ratio of 2.12. A Distress Score measuring the distress or impairment associated with endorsed positive symptoms increased the specificity to 68%, while retaining similar sensitivity of 88%. Agreement was very similar when participants with psychotic syndromes were excluded from the analyses. These results suggest that the PQ-B may be used as an effective, efficient self-report screen for prodromal psychosis syndromes when followed by diagnostic interview, in a two-stage evaluation process in help-seeking populations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21511440      PMCID: PMC3113633          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  11 in total

1.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: an empirical question.

Authors:  Lawrence H Yang; Ahtoy J Wonpat-Borja; Mark G Opler; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl M Corcoran; Michael B First; Barbara Cornblatt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Carrie E Bearden; Jennifer K Johnson; Adrian Raine; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Validation of "prodromal" criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Barnaby Nelson; Carrie Stanford; Magenta B Simmons; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Lisa J Phillips; Andreas Bechdolf; Joe Buckby; Patrick D McGorry
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Self-report of attenuated psychotic experiences in a college population.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Jennifer K Johnson; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Self-reported psychotic experiences in the general population: a valid screening tool for DSM-III-R psychotic disorders?

Authors:  M S S Hanssen; R V Bijl; W Vollebergh; J van Os
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  PACE: a specialised service for young people at risk of psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Patrick D McGorry; Shona M Francey; Barnaby Nelson; Kathryn Baker; Lisa J Phillips; Gregor Berger; G Paul Amminger
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Kristin Cadenhead; Barbara Cornblatt; Scott W Woods; Jean Addington; Elaine Walker; Larry J Seidman; Diana Perkins; Ming Tsuang; Thomas McGlashan; Robert Heinssen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01

10.  The "close-in" or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder.

Authors:  Patrick D McGorry; Alison R Yung; Lisa J Phillips
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  98 in total

1.  Adverse childhood experiences and psychotic-like experiences are associated above and beyond shared correlates: Findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development study.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Tara A Niendam; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Mental Health and Functional Outcomes in Young Adulthood of Children With Psychotic Symptoms: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Antonella Trotta; Louise Arseneault; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt; Andrea Danese; Carmine Pariante; Helen L Fisher
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Interpersonal sensitivity and functioning impairment in youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  A Masillo; L R Valmaggia; R Saba; M Brandizzi; J F Lindau; A Solfanelli; M Curto; F Narilli; L Telesforo; G D Kotzalidis; D Di Pietro; M D'Alema; P Girardi; P Fiori Nastro
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Validation of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief in a representative sample of adolescents: Internal structure, norms, reliability, and links with psychopathology.

Authors:  Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Felix Inchausti; Alicia Pérez-Albéniz; Javier Ortuño-Sierra
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Schizotypy, psychotic-like experiences and distress: an interaction model.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Camille Wilson; Sabrina Ereshefsky; Katie L Nugent; Steven Pitts; Gloria Reeves; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 6.  Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordina Tor; Montserrat Dolz; Anna Sintes; Daniel Muñoz; Marta Pardo; Elena de la Serna; Olga Puig; Gisela Sugranyes; Inmaculada Baeza
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Care Pathways Before First Diagnosis of a Psychotic Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Christine Stewart; Enid M Hunkeler; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Frances Lynch; Karen J Coleman; Arne Beck; Belinda H Operskalski; Robert B Penfold; David S Carrell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  An item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version: Developing a screening form that informs understanding of self-reported psychotic-like experiences in childhood.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Michael T Perino; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-02-27

9.  Factor structure, measurement and structural invariance, and external validity of an abbreviated youth version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale.

Authors:  Ashley L Watts; Gregory T Smith; Deanna M Barch; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-12-16

10.  Psychosis screening practices in schools: A survey of school-based mental health providers.

Authors:  Emily R Kline; Cole Chokran; Janine Rodenhiser-Hill; Larry J Seidman; Kristen A Woodberry
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.