Literature DB >> 29250403

Crystal structure of (1S,4S)-2,5-diazo-niabi-cyclo[2.2.1]heptane dibromide.

Sergey N Britvin1, Andrey M Rumyantsev2.   

Abstract

The cage of 2,5-di-aza-bicyclo-[2.2.1]heptane is frequently employed in synthetic chemistry as a rigid bicyclic counterpart of the piperazine ring. The 2,5-di-azabicyclo-[2.2.1]heptane scaffold is incorporated into a variety of compounds having pharmacological and catalytic applications. The unsubstituted parent ring of the system, 2,5-di-aza-bicyclo-[2.2.1]heptane itself, has not been structurally characterized. We herein report on the mol-ecular structure of the parent ring in (1S,4S)-2,5-diazo-niabi-cyclo-[2.2.1]heptane dibromide, C5H12N222Br-. The asymmetric unit contains two crystallographically independent cages of 2,5-di-aza-bicyclo-[2.2.1]heptane. Each cage is protonated at the two nitro-gen sites. The overall charge balance is maintained by four crystallographically independent bromide ions. In the crystal, the components of the structure are linked via a complex three-dimensional network of N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]hepta­ne; bicyclic amine; bridged heterocycle; crystal structure; di­amine; piperazine

Year:  2017        PMID: 29250403      PMCID: PMC5730240          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017015870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Derivatives of the bicyclic nucleus of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane comprise a wide family of biochemically active compounds (Murineddu et al., 2012 ▸), including anti­biotics (McGuirk et al., 1992 ▸; Remuzon et al., 1993 ▸), vasodilating (López-Ortiz et al., 2014 ▸) and anti­tumor agents (Hamblett et al., 2007 ▸; Shchekotikhin et al., 2014 ▸; Gerstenberger et al., 2016 ▸; Laskar et al., 2017 ▸). A broad range of these compounds have been found to exhibit potency as nicotinic acetyl­choline receptor ligands (Toma et al., 2002 ▸; Artali et al., 2005 ▸; Bunnelle et al., 2007 ▸; Anderson et al., 2008 ▸; Li et al., 2010 ▸; Beinat et al., 2015 ▸; Bertrand et al., 2015 ▸). As a result of the occurrence of two chiral centers, 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]hepta­nes are utilized as chiral scaffolds in asymmetric catalysis (Jordis et al., 1999 ▸; González-Olvera et al., 2008 ▸; Castillo et al., 2013 ▸; Díaz-de-Villegas et al., 2014 ▸; Avila-Ortiz et al., 2015 ▸). The di­amine system of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane is traditionally included in screening libraries as a rigid counterpart of the flexible piperazine ring (Siebeneicher et al., 2016 ▸; Dam et al., 2016 ▸; Cernak et al., 2017 ▸; Llona-Minguez et al., 2017 ▸; Wei et al., 2017 ▸). As a consequence, numerous synthetic routes for the preparation of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane derivatives have been introduced (see: Portoghese & Mikhail, 1966 ▸; Jordis et al., 1990 ▸; Yakovlev et al., 2000 ▸; Fiorelli et al., 2005 ▸; Beinat et al., 2013 ▸; Cui et al., 2015 ▸; Choi et al., 2016 ▸ and the references cited therein). At the same time, the reported structural data on 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane derivatives are surprisingly scarce (see the Database survey). Moreover, the parent ring of unsubstituted 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane has not been structurally characterized. In the framework of current research on caged heterocyclic systems (Britvin & Lotnyk, 2015 ▸; Britvin et al., 2016 ▸; 2017a ▸,b ▸; Britvin & Rumyantsev, 2017b ▸), we herein describe the mol­ecular structure of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane (Fig. 1 ▸) in its di­hydro­bromide salt, (1S,4S)-2,5-diazo­niabi­cyclo­[2.2.1]heptane di­bro­mide (1).
Figure 1

Two views of the diprotonated 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane parent ring in 1 (in one of the two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit). The atomic numbering scheme is according to IUPAC notation. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are depicted as fixed-size spheres of arbitrary radius. The bromide counter-ions have been omitted for clarity.

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of 1 contains two structurally independent cages of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane (Fig. 2 ▸). The mol­ecular geometries of the cages are statistically different: the biggest discrepancy, 0.044 Å, is observed for N2⋯N5 [2.868 (3) Å] and N2A⋯N5A [2.912 (3) Å], whereas the distances between the bridgehead C atoms C1⋯C4 [2.220 (4) Å] and C1A⋯C4A [2.226 (4) Å] are statistically the same (see the Supporting information). Therefore, in spite of bridge-imparted rigidity, the hexa­gonal ring of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane can be affected by some geometric distortions. The framework of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane is frequently considered to be the bicyclic counterpart of piperazine where the occurrence of the C1–C7–C4 bridge imparts rigidity to the hexa­gonal ring (Kiely et al., 1991 ▸; Beinat et al., 2013 ▸; 2015 ▸). It is worth noting that the bicyclic bridged structure of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane determines the boat conformation of its cage (Fig. 1 ▸). Contrary to that, the piperazine ring is flexible and can adopt four different conformations: chair, boat, twist-boat and half-boat, the former being the energetically most favourable (SenGupta et al., 2014 ▸). A comparison of the hexa­gonal rings of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane and the chair conformer of piperazine (Fig. 2 ▸) shows that the inter­atomic distances between the opposing nitro­gen atoms are remarkably close. The latter feature can be important because the nitro­gen sites are known to be pharmacophores frequently determining the biochemical activity of piperazine derivatives (Patel & Park, 2013 ▸). Therefore, the implication of the 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane scaffold as a piperazine analogue in screening libraries looks quite reasonable from the structural point of view.
Figure 2

(a) The two independent mol­ecules of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane in the crystal structure of 1 (this work). (b) The chair conformer of piperazine in piperazine-1,4-diium dibromide monohydrate (Bujak, 2015 ▸). The atomic numbering schemes are given in IUPAC notation. Symmetrically equivalent atoms in the piperazine ring are noted in parentheses. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. Hydrogen atoms, bromide counter-ions and water mol­ecules have been omitted for clarity.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal structure of 1, the protonated nitro­gen sites in the two symmetrically non-equivalent 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane cages are counter balanced by the four structurally independent bromide ions. This results in the emergence of a complicated network of hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3 ▸). Hydrogen-bonded amine mol­ecules are arranged into infinite slabs parallel to (100). The slabs are linked by N—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional network. The full listing of N—H⋯Br bonds is given in Table 1 ▸. This three-dimensional net of hydrogen bonds is much more complex than the flat ‘zigzaghydrogen bonding occurring in the geometrically similar cage of 7-aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane (7-aza­norbornane) (Britvin & Rumyantsev, 2017a ▸).
Figure 3

Hydrogen bonding in the crystal structure of 1. Protonated mol­ecules of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane are linked by N—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, forming slabs parallel to (100). These slabs are linked by N—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional network. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯Br30.93 (3)2.49 (3)3.358 (2)156 (2)
N5—H5A⋯Br40.92 (3)2.44 (3)3.261 (2)148 (3)
N5—H5B⋯Br1i 0.78 (3)2.50 (3)3.242 (2)161 (3)
N2A—H2AA⋯Br30.89 (3)2.53 (4)3.344 (2)152 (3)
N2A—H2AB⋯Br1ii 0.86 (3)2.48 (3)3.273 (2)155 (2)
N5A—H5AA⋯Br20.91 (3)2.42 (3)3.292 (2)160 (3)
N5A—H5AB⋯Br10.77 (3)2.77 (3)3.399 (2)140 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Database survey

In spite of extensive studies of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane derivatives (see the Chemical context), there are just 14 structures which comprise this bicyclic system in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD version 5.38, May 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ▸). Jordis et al. (1999 ▸) reported a series of substituted (1S,4S)-2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]hepta­nes and provided the first structure determination of the 1,2,5-substituted derivative. Lauteslager et al. (2001 ▸) carried out a comparative study of chromophores containing piperazine and 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane groups. Apart from the majority of the latest studies, which are devoted to different aspects of the organic chemistry of the title scaffold (Alvaro et al., 2007 ▸; Mereiter et al., 2007 ▸; Krasnov et al., 2008 ▸; Melgar-Fernández et al., 2008 ▸; Wu et al., 2011 ▸), Pérez et al. (2011 ▸) and Castillo et al. (2013 ▸) have reported the first examples of coordination compounds between copper(II) and substituted 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]hepta­nes. To the best of our knowledge, no structural data on the unsubstituted parent ring of 2,5-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane have been reported.

Synthesis and crystallization

(1S,4S)-Di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptane di­hydro­bromide (1) was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich and found to be analytically pure [analysis calculated for C5H12Br2N2 (259.97): C 23.10, H 4.65, N 10.78; found C 23.03, H 4.71, N 10.69]. NMR spectra (Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer, using SiMe4 as an external standard) are consistent with the previously published data (Melgar-Fernández et al., 2008 ▸) and confirm the purity of the substance (atomic numbering according to Fig. 1 ▸): 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, D2O): δ = 4.67 (d, 2H, CH at C1 and C4), 3.65–3.57 (m, 4H, CH 2 at C3 and C6), 2.29 (s, 2H, CH 2 at C7). 13C{1H} NMR (100.62 MHz, D2O): δ = 56.36 (s, NCHCH2, C1 and C4), 47.09 (s, NCH 2CH, C3 and C6), 34.73 (s, CHCH 2CH, C7). Crystals of 1 suitable for structural study were obtained by slow evaporation of a saturated aqueous solution at room temperature.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. Hydrogen atoms at nitro­gen sites (i.e. those involved in hydrogen bonding) were freely refined whereas hydrogen atoms at all carbon centers were treated with fixed U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) and riding coordinates (C—H = 0.97–0.98 Å).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H12N2 2+·2Br
M r 259.99
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)9.7298 (6), 11.8643 (5), 14.4933 (7)
V3)1673.07 (15)
Z 8
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)9.61
Crystal size (mm)0.2 × 0.08 × 0.05
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections15838, 4031, 3959
R int 0.026
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.661
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.014, 0.035, 1.02
No. of reflections4031
No. of parameters195
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.53, −0.34
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1676 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.009 (5)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017015870/lh5858sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017015870/lh5858Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017015870/lh5858Isup3.mol Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017015870/lh5858Isup4.cml CCDC reference: 1578911 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H12N22+·2BrDx = 2.064 Mg m3
Mr = 259.99Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121Cell parameters from 9887 reflections
a = 9.7298 (6) Åθ = 2.5–31.5°
b = 11.8643 (5) ŵ = 9.61 mm1
c = 14.4933 (7) ÅT = 100 K
V = 1673.07 (15) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.2 × 0.08 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 1008
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer4031 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine focus sealed tube3959 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.026
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)h = −12→12
k = −13→15
15838 measured reflectionsl = −19→17
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0162P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.035(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.53 e Å3
4031 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
195 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1676 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
0 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.009 (5)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.5925 (3)0.3998 (2)0.37609 (18)0.0160 (5)
H10.67220.45010.37970.019*
N20.4926 (2)0.4270 (2)0.29906 (15)0.0143 (4)
H2A0.479 (3)0.505 (3)0.2960 (18)0.011 (7)*
H2B0.519 (4)0.403 (3)0.245 (3)0.038 (11)*
C30.3610 (3)0.3669 (2)0.32592 (18)0.0162 (5)
H3A0.33770.30840.28180.019*
H3B0.28480.41920.33100.019*
C40.3987 (3)0.3168 (3)0.41995 (18)0.0183 (6)
H40.32030.29830.45960.022*
N50.4954 (2)0.2198 (2)0.40090 (17)0.0167 (5)
H5A0.454 (3)0.170 (3)0.361 (2)0.024 (9)*
H5B0.504 (3)0.186 (3)0.446 (2)0.013 (8)*
C60.6277 (3)0.2749 (2)0.36993 (18)0.0158 (5)
H6A0.65110.25340.30730.019*
H6B0.70330.25570.41060.019*
C70.4971 (3)0.4045 (2)0.45944 (18)0.0205 (6)
H7A0.45460.47780.46780.025*
H7B0.54110.38020.51610.025*
C1A0.6072 (3)0.8241 (2)0.59473 (17)0.0139 (5)
H1A0.69180.86240.57580.017*
N2A0.4792 (2)0.8628 (2)0.54520 (15)0.0141 (4)
H2AA0.478 (4)0.844 (3)0.486 (2)0.033 (10)*
H2AB0.476 (3)0.935 (3)0.5432 (19)0.010 (7)*
C3A0.3626 (2)0.8184 (2)0.60478 (19)0.0160 (5)
H3AA0.31030.76100.57260.019*
H3AB0.30110.87860.62330.019*
C4A0.4384 (3)0.7687 (2)0.68803 (18)0.0152 (5)
H4A0.38350.76350.74460.018*
N5A0.5014 (2)0.6592 (2)0.65645 (16)0.0154 (4)
H5AA0.437 (3)0.612 (3)0.631 (2)0.019 (8)*
H5AB0.534 (3)0.629 (3)0.698 (2)0.021 (9)*
C6A0.6121 (3)0.6950 (2)0.58809 (17)0.0163 (5)
H6AA0.59070.66940.52620.020*
H6AB0.70150.66620.60590.020*
C7A0.5656 (3)0.8433 (2)0.69531 (17)0.0161 (5)
H7AA0.63280.81490.73890.019*
H7AB0.54390.92140.70870.019*
Br10.52194 (2)0.62674 (2)0.88905 (2)0.01450 (6)
Br20.22116 (2)0.51516 (2)0.60873 (2)0.01567 (6)
Br30.46504 (3)0.70005 (2)0.35710 (2)0.01494 (6)
Br40.26144 (3)0.04454 (2)0.32745 (2)0.01680 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0142 (12)0.0157 (14)0.0181 (13)−0.0018 (10)−0.0058 (10)0.0015 (10)
N20.0145 (10)0.0138 (12)0.0148 (10)0.0003 (9)0.0011 (8)0.0031 (9)
C30.0109 (11)0.0191 (14)0.0185 (12)−0.0006 (10)0.0001 (10)0.0020 (11)
C40.0136 (12)0.0217 (15)0.0195 (12)0.0003 (10)0.0063 (10)0.0044 (11)
N50.0191 (11)0.0135 (12)0.0174 (11)−0.0037 (9)−0.0026 (9)0.0043 (9)
C60.0125 (11)0.0177 (14)0.0173 (13)0.0002 (10)−0.0025 (9)0.0005 (10)
C70.0285 (15)0.0199 (15)0.0130 (12)0.0033 (11)−0.0022 (10)−0.0030 (10)
C1A0.0107 (11)0.0138 (14)0.0173 (13)−0.0008 (9)−0.0006 (9)0.0023 (10)
N2A0.0172 (11)0.0115 (12)0.0135 (10)0.0008 (9)−0.0007 (8)0.0004 (8)
C3A0.0108 (11)0.0168 (14)0.0206 (13)0.0024 (9)−0.0019 (9)0.0010 (11)
C4A0.0143 (12)0.0164 (14)0.0150 (12)−0.0014 (10)0.0001 (9)0.0016 (10)
N5A0.0148 (10)0.0141 (11)0.0173 (11)−0.0008 (9)−0.0031 (8)0.0034 (9)
C6A0.0147 (12)0.0163 (14)0.0178 (12)0.0029 (10)0.0008 (9)0.0006 (10)
C7A0.0173 (12)0.0147 (14)0.0162 (12)−0.0020 (10)−0.0027 (10)0.0012 (10)
Br10.01665 (12)0.01277 (12)0.01407 (12)−0.00094 (9)−0.00018 (9)−0.00022 (9)
Br20.01471 (12)0.01456 (13)0.01775 (11)−0.00228 (9)−0.00073 (10)0.00003 (10)
Br30.01588 (12)0.01335 (13)0.01560 (12)0.00039 (9)0.00032 (9)0.00008 (9)
Br40.01390 (12)0.01434 (13)0.02214 (12)−0.00278 (9)0.00270 (9)−0.00030 (10)
C1—H10.9800C3A—H3AA0.9700
C1—N21.516 (3)C3A—H3AB0.9700
C1—C61.523 (4)C3A—C4A1.532 (4)
C1—C71.525 (4)C4A—H4A0.9800
N2—H2A0.93 (3)C4A—N5A1.508 (3)
N2—H2B0.87 (4)C4A—C7A1.525 (4)
N2—C31.516 (3)N5A—H5AA0.91 (3)
C3—H3A0.9700N5A—H5AB0.77 (3)
C3—H3B0.9700N5A—C6A1.523 (3)
C3—C41.532 (4)C6A—H6AA0.9700
C4—H40.9800C6A—H6AB0.9700
C4—N51.512 (4)C7A—H7AA0.9700
C4—C71.525 (4)C7A—H7AB0.9700
N5—H5A0.92 (3)N2—N52.868 (3)
N5—H5B0.78 (3)N2A—N5A2.912 (3)
N5—C61.512 (3)C1—C42.220 (4)
C6—H6A0.9700C1A—C4A2.226 (4)
C6—H6B0.9700C3—C62.887 (4)
C7—H7A0.9700C3A—C6A2.845 (4)
C7—H7B0.9700N2—C72.340 (4)
C1A—H1A0.9800N2A—C7A2.344 (3)
C1A—N2A1.509 (3)N5—C72.350 (4)
C1A—C6A1.535 (4)N5A—C7A2.340 (4)
C1A—C7A1.530 (3)C3—C72.387 (4)
N2A—H2AA0.89 (3)C3A—C7A2.390 (4)
N2A—H2AB0.86 (3)C6—C72.380 (4)
N2A—C3A1.521 (3)C6A—C7A2.391 (4)
N2—C1—H1114.7N2A—C1A—H1A114.8
N2—C1—C6107.9 (2)N2A—C1A—C6A107.4 (2)
N2—C1—C7100.66 (19)N2A—C1A—C7A101.0 (2)
C6—C1—H1114.7C6A—C1A—H1A114.8
C6—C1—C7102.7 (2)C7A—C1A—H1A114.8
C7—C1—H1114.7C7A—C1A—C6A102.5 (2)
C1—N2—H2A109.5 (17)C1A—N2A—H2AA113 (2)
C1—N2—H2B114 (3)C1A—N2A—H2AB111 (2)
C1—N2—C3104.64 (19)C1A—N2A—C3A103.90 (18)
H2A—N2—H2B109 (3)H2AA—N2A—H2AB102 (3)
C3—N2—H2A111.1 (18)C3A—N2A—H2AA117 (2)
C3—N2—H2B109 (3)C3A—N2A—H2AB110 (2)
N2—C3—H3A111.4N2A—C3A—H3AA111.2
N2—C3—H3B111.4N2A—C3A—H3AB111.2
N2—C3—C4102.0 (2)N2A—C3A—C4A102.76 (19)
H3A—C3—H3B109.2H3AA—C3A—H3AB109.1
C4—C3—H3A111.4C4A—C3A—H3AA111.2
C4—C3—H3B111.4C4A—C3A—H3AB111.2
C3—C4—H4114.9C3A—C4A—H4A114.9
N5—C4—C3106.4 (2)N5A—C4A—C3A106.7 (2)
N5—C4—H4114.9N5A—C4A—H4A114.9
N5—C4—C7101.4 (2)N5A—C4A—C7A101.0 (2)
C7—C4—C3102.7 (2)C7A—C4A—C3A102.9 (2)
C7—C4—H4114.9C7A—C4A—H4A114.9
C4—N5—H5A110 (2)C4A—N5A—H5AA112 (2)
C4—N5—H5B108 (2)C4A—N5A—H5AB109 (3)
C4—N5—C6104.7 (2)C4A—N5A—C6A104.2 (2)
H5A—N5—H5B104 (3)H5AA—N5A—H5AB108 (3)
C6—N5—H5A118 (2)C6A—N5A—H5AA113.2 (19)
C6—N5—H5B113 (2)C6A—N5A—H5AB110 (2)
C1—C6—H6A111.3C1A—C6A—H6AA111.3
C1—C6—H6B111.3C1A—C6A—H6AB111.3
N5—C6—C1102.2 (2)N5A—C6A—C1A102.4 (2)
N5—C6—H6A111.3N5A—C6A—H6AA111.3
N5—C6—H6B111.3N5A—C6A—H6AB111.3
H6A—C6—H6B109.2H6AA—C6A—H6AB109.2
C1—C7—C493.4 (2)C1A—C7A—H7AA113.0
C1—C7—H7A113.0C1A—C7A—H7AB113.0
C1—C7—H7B113.0C4A—C7A—C1A93.6 (2)
C4—C7—H7A113.0C4A—C7A—H7AA113.0
C4—C7—H7B113.0C4A—C7A—H7AB113.0
H7A—C7—H7B110.4H7AA—C7A—H7AB110.4
C1—N2—C3—C43.2 (3)C1A—N2A—C3A—C4A5.5 (3)
N2—C1—C6—N5−71.1 (2)N2A—C1A—C6A—N5A−74.2 (2)
N2—C1—C7—C456.3 (2)N2A—C1A—C7A—C4A56.7 (2)
N2—C3—C4—N5−73.1 (2)N2A—C3A—C4A—N5A−75.1 (2)
N2—C3—C4—C733.0 (3)N2A—C3A—C4A—C7A30.8 (3)
C3—C4—N5—C671.2 (2)C3A—C4A—N5A—C6A67.9 (2)
C3—C4—C7—C1−55.1 (2)C3A—C4A—C7A—C1A−53.4 (2)
C4—N5—C6—C10.8 (3)C4A—N5A—C6A—C1A4.5 (2)
N5—C4—C7—C154.9 (2)N5A—C4A—C7A—C1A56.8 (2)
C6—C1—N2—C369.0 (2)C6A—C1A—N2A—C3A67.2 (2)
C6—C1—C7—C4−55.1 (2)C6A—C1A—C7A—C4A−54.1 (2)
C7—C1—N2—C3−38.2 (2)C7A—C1A—N2A—C3A−39.8 (2)
C7—C1—C6—N534.7 (2)C7A—C1A—C6A—N5A31.7 (2)
C7—C4—N5—C6−35.9 (2)C7A—C4A—N5A—C6A−39.3 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···Br30.93 (3)2.49 (3)3.358 (2)156 (2)
N5—H5A···Br40.92 (3)2.44 (3)3.261 (2)148 (3)
N5—H5B···Br1i0.78 (3)2.50 (3)3.242 (2)161 (3)
N2A—H2AA···Br30.89 (3)2.53 (4)3.344 (2)152 (3)
N2A—H2AB···Br1ii0.86 (3)2.48 (3)3.273 (2)155 (2)
N5A—H5AA···Br20.91 (3)2.42 (3)3.292 (2)160 (3)
N5A—H5AB···Br10.77 (3)2.77 (3)3.399 (2)140 (3)
  26 in total

Review 1.  An evolving role of piperazine moieties in drug design and discovery.

Authors:  Rahul V Patel; Se Won Park
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.862

2.  Syntheses and structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of 2,5-diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptanes as novel alpha7 neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) ligands.

Authors:  Tao Li; William H Bunnelle; Keith B Ryther; David J Anderson; John Malysz; Rosalind Helfrich; Jens H Grønlien; Monika Håkerud; Dan Peters; Michael R Schrimpf; Murali Gopalakrishnan; Jianguo Ji
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Structure-activity relationship studies of SEN12333 analogues: determination of the optimal requirements for binding affinities at α7 nAChRs through incorporation of known structural motifs.

Authors:  Corinne Beinat; Tristan Reekie; Samuel D Banister; James O'Brien-Brown; Teresa Xie; Thao T Olson; Yingxian Xiao; Andrew Harvey; Susan O'Connor; Carolyn Coles; Anton Grishin; Peter Kolesik; John Tsanaktsidis; Michael Kassiou
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Docking of 6-chloropyridazin-3-yl derivatives active on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors into molluscan acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP).

Authors:  Roberto Artali; Gabriella Bombieri; Fiorella Meneghetti
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  2005-04

5.  Between Adamantane and Atrane: Intrabridgehead Interactions in the Cage-Like Phosphane Related to a Novel Tris(homoadamantane) Ring System.

Authors:  Sergey N Britvin; Andrey M Rumyantsev; Anastasia E Zobnina; Marina V Padkina
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Synthesis and evaluation of new antitumor 3-aminomethyl-4,11-dihydroxynaphtho[2,3-f]indole-5,10-diones.

Authors:  Andrey E Shchekotikhin; Valeria A Glazunova; Lyubov G Dezhenkova; Yuri N Luzikov; Vladimir N Buyanov; Helena M Treshalina; Nina A Lesnaya; Vladimir I Romanenko; Dmitry N Kaluzhny; Jan Balzarini; Keli Agama; Yves Pommier; Alexander A Shtil; Maria N Preobrazhenskaya
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Structure-activity studies and analgesic efficacy of N-(3-pyridinyl)-bridged bicyclic diamines, exceptionally potent agonists at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  William H Bunnelle; Jerome F Daanen; Keith B Ryther; Michael R Schrimpf; Michael J Dart; Arianna Gelain; Michael D Meyer; Jennifer M Frost; David J Anderson; Michael Buckley; Peter Curzon; Ying-Jun Cao; Pamela Puttfarcken; Xenia Searle; Jianguo Ji; C Brent Putman; Carol Surowy; Lucio Toma; Daniela Barlocco
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  (1S,4S)-2-(2,4-Difluoro-phen-yl)-5-[(4-methyl-phen-yl)sulfon-yl]-2,5-diaza-bicyclo-[2.2.1]hepta-ne.

Authors:  Chunli Wu; Jingyu Zhang; Pan Li; Junxia Zhang; Jizhou Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-01-08

9.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.