Literature DB >> 7995187

Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

T Hallgren1, S Fasth, D S Delbro, S Nordgren, T Oresland, L Hultén.   

Abstract

The physiological and clinical effects of loperamide treatment versus placebo were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in patients operated with restorative proctocolectomy. Sixteen patients operated with endoanal mucosectomy and a handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 14 patients operated with abdominal proctocolectomy and stapling of the pouch to the top of the anal canal were studied. While loperamide treatment increased resting anal pressure in both groups of patients by approximately 20% (P < 0.05), squeeze pressure was not affected. Loperamide did not affect pouch volume or contractility. Sensory thresholds and the recto/pouch-anal inhibitory reflex were not influenced by loperamide treatment. Clinical function was improved, with a reduced bowel frequency and an improved nighttime continence, with less soiling (P < 0.05) as well as need to wear a protective pad.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7995187     DOI: 10.1007/BF02087698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  The effect of loperamide on bowel habits and anal sphincter function in patients with ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  R Emblem; R Stien; L Mørkrid
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status.

Authors:  J H Pemberton; S F Phillips; R R Ready; A R Zinsmeister; O H Beahrs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Effects of loperamide on acetylcholine and prostaglandin release from isolated guinea pig ileum.

Authors:  O Yagasaki; H Suzuki; Y Sohji
Journal:  Jpn J Pharmacol       Date:  1978-12

4.  The stapled ileal pouch--anal anastomosis. A randomized study comparing two different pouch designs.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Mechanism of the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide.

Authors:  L R Schiller; C A Santa Ana; S G Morawski; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Influence of loperamide and loperamide oxide on the anal sphincter. A manometric study.

Authors:  M Göke; K Ewe; K Donner; K H Meyer zum Büschenfelde
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Absorptive and motor components of the antidiarrhoeal action of loperamide: an in vivo study in pigs.

Authors:  V Théodorou; J Fioramonti; T Hachet; L Buéno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The effects of atropine or benzilonium on pelvic pouch and anal sphincter functions.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; D Delbro; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Influence of sleep on anal sphincteric pressure in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  B A Orkin; N J Soper; K A Kelly; J Dent
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Effect of antidiarrheal and antimotility drugs on ileal excreta.

Authors:  P Kramer
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-04
View more
  19 in total

1.  Controlling anal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide (CAPABLe) trial: Design and methods.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Alayne D Markland; William E Whitehead; Matthew D Barber; Diane K Newman; Rebecca G Rogers; Keisha Dyer; Anthony Visco; Vivian W Sung; Gary Sutkin; Susan F Meikle; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  New therapies for functional bowel diseases.

Authors:  B Coulie; M Camilleri
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Medical management of fecal incontinence in challenging populations: a review.

Authors:  David Lee; Gaurav Arora
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

5.  Ten years experience of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  M Davies; P R Hawley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

7.  The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat.

Authors:  Mark Fox; Bernadette Stutz; Dieter Menne; Michael Fried; Werner Schwizer; Miriam Thumshirn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; Bo Shen; Feza Remzi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Treatment of IBD: where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Effect of calcium polycarbophil on bowel function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chikashi Shibata; Yuji Funayama; Kouhei Fukushima; Ken-Ichi Takahashi; Hitoshi Ogawa; Sho Haneda; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Katsuyoshi Kudoh; Atsushi Kohyama; Kei-Ichi Hayashi; Iwao Sasaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.