Literature DB >> 29241149

A novel use of 3D printing model demonstrates the effects of deteriorated trabecular bone structure on bone stiffness and strength.

Meir Max Barak1, Margaret Arielle Black2.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone structure is crucial to normal mechanical behavior of bones. Studies have shown that osteoporosis negatively affects trabecular bone structure, mainly by reducing bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and thus increasing fracture risk. One major limitation in assessing and quantifying the effect of this structural deterioration is that no two trabecular structures are identical. Thus, when we compare a group of healthy bones against a different group of bones that experienced resorption (i.e. decreased BV/TV) we only discover an "average" mechanical effect. It is impossible to quantify the mechanical effect of individual structural deterioration for each sample, simply because we never have the same sample in both states (intact and deteriorated structure). 3D printing is a new technology that can assist in overcoming this issue. Here we report a preliminary study that compares a healthy 3D printed trabecular bone model with the same model after bone resorption was simulated. Since the deteriorated structural bone model is derived from the healthy one, it is possible to directly estimate (percentage wise) the decrease of tissue stiffness and strength as a result of bone resorption for this specific structure. Our results demonstrate that a relatively small decrease in BV/TV (about 8%) leads to a dramatic decrease in structural strength (24%) and structural stiffness (17%), (P < 0.01). Structural strength decreased from an average of 9.14 ± 2.85MPa to 6.97 ± 2.44MPa, while structural stiffness decreased from an average of 282.5 ± 63.4N/mm to 233.8 ± 51.2N/mm. This study demonstrates that 3D printing is a novel and valuable tool for quantifying the effect of structural deterioration on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. In the future, this approach may help us attain better personal fracture risk assessments by CT scanning, 3D printing and mechanically testing individual bone replicas from patients suffering excessive bone resorption.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Biomechanics; Bone histomorphometry; Osteoporosis; Trabecular bone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241149      PMCID: PMC5758409          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  77 in total

1.  Trabecular bone's mechanical properties are affected by its non-uniform mineral distribution.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel; J A Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone.

Authors:  Michael J Jaasma; Harun H Bayraktar; Glen L Niebur; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia.

Authors:  R S Siffert; G M Luo; S C Cowin; J J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Extraordinarily low bone mineral density in an old female chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) from the Mahale Mountains National Park.

Authors:  Harumoto Gunji; Kazuhiko Hosaka; Michael A Huffman; Kenji Kawanaka; Akiko Matsumoto-Oda; Yuzuru Hamada; Toshisada Nishida
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  B Li; R M Aspden
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; C M Ford; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fractures.

Authors:  B D Snyder; S Piazza; W T Edwards; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads.

Authors:  J Homminga; B Van-Rietbergen; E M Lochmüller; H Weinans; F Eckstein; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Trabecular bone resorption depth decreases with age: differences between normal males and females.

Authors:  E F Eriksen; L Mosekilde; F Melsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Trabecular evidence for a human-like gait in Australopithecus africanus.

Authors:  Meir M Barak; Daniel E Lieberman; David Raichlen; Herman Pontzer; Anna G Warrener; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Are we crying Wolff? 3D printed replicas of trabecular bone structure demonstrate higher stiffness and strength during off-axis loading.

Authors:  Zach Wood; Lisa Lynn; Jack T Nguyen; Margaret A Black; Meha Patel; Meir M Barak
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

Review 3.  Causal contributors to tissue stiffness and clinical relevance in urology.

Authors:  Laura Martinez-Vidal; Valentina Murdica; Chiara Venegoni; Filippo Pederzoli; Marco Bandini; Andrea Necchi; Andrea Salonia; Massimo Alfano
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Abid Haleem; Mohd Javaid; Rizwan Hasan Khan; Rajiv Suman
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

5.  Investigation and Feasibility of Combined 3D Printed Thermoplastic Filament and Polymeric Foam to Simulate the Cortiocancellous Interface of Human Vertebrae.

Authors:  William Clifton; Mark Pichelmann; Alexander Vlasak; Aaron Damon; Karim ReFaey; Eric Nottmeier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Medial tibial plateau sustaining higher physiological stress than the lateral plateau: based on 3D printing and finite element method.

Authors:  Liqin Zheng; Yuexing Dai; Yongze Zheng; Xingpeng He; Minhui Wu; Desheng Zheng; ChiHung Li; Yueguang Fan; Ziling Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.903

Review 7.  Tissue Engineering Through 3D Bioprinting to Recreate and Study Bone Disease.

Authors:  Adriene Pavek; Christopher Nartker; Maamoon Saleh; Matthew Kirkham; Sana Khajeh Pour; Ali Aghazadeh-Habashi; Jared J Barrott
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-14

8.  Mechanical metric for skeletal biomechanics derived from spectral analysis of stiffness matrix.

Authors:  Petr Henyš; Michal Kuchař; Petr Hájek; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.