| Literature DB >> 29240664 |
Enikő Rab1,2, Dimitrios Kekos3, Vassilios Roussis4, Efstathia Ioannou5.
Abstract
Four new (1-4) and six previously reported (5-10) α-pyrone polyketides, along with benzoic acid, hydrocinnamic acid, and (E)-cinnamic acid, were isolated from the organic extract resulting from the cultivation of the algicolous strain Streptomyces ambofaciens BI0048, which in turn was isolated from the inner tissues of the red alga Laurencia glandulifera. The structure elucidation of the isolated natural products was based on extensive analysis of their spectroscopic data (NMR, MS, UV, IR). Compounds 1-10 were evaluated for their antibacterial and cytotoxic activities against two multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and one strain of Escherichia coli, as well as two human cancer cell lines.Entities:
Keywords: Streptomyces ambofaciens; algicolous actinobacterium; bioactivity evaluation; endophytic strain; polyketides; structure elucidation; α-pyrone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29240664 PMCID: PMC5742849 DOI: 10.3390/md15120389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–10 isolated from the algicolous endophytic strain Streptomyces ambofaciens BI0048.
1H (400 MHz) and 13C (50 MHz) NMR data in CDCl3 of compounds 1 and 2.
| Position | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 165.2, C 1 | - | 165.0, C 1 | - |
| 2 | 87.8, CH | 5.27, d (2.2) | 87.7, CH | 5.39, d (2.2) |
| 3 | 170.9, C | - | 171.3, C | - |
| 4 | 101.3, CH | 5.43, d (2.2) | 100.7, CH | 5.68, d (2.2) |
| 5 | 162.8, C | - | 164.2, C | - |
| 6 | 38.3, CH2 | 3.52, s | 39.7, CH2 | 3.67, s |
| 7 | 134.4, C 1 | - | 136.5, C | - |
| 8 | 123.2, CH | 6.87, d (7.5) | 121.5, CH | 6.78, brd (7.5) |
| 9 | 133.0, CH | 7.36, dd (8.2, 7.5) | 130.0, CH | 7.17, t (7.5) |
| 10 | 116.7, CH | 6.95, d (8.2) | 114.5, CH | 6.74, m |
| 11 | 157.0, C 1 | - | 156.0, C 1 | - |
| 12 | 123.7, C 1 | - | 116.2, CH | 6.73, d (1.0) |
| 13 | 199.2, C 1 | - | - | - |
| 14 | 138.2, C 1 | - | - | - |
| 15 | 129.1, CH | 7.67, d (8.3) | - | - |
| 16 | 128.9, CH | 7.43, dd (8.3, 7.4) | - | - |
| 17 | 133.6, CH | 7.57, t (7.4) | - | - |
| 18 | 128.9, CH | 7.43, dd (8.3, 7.4) | - | - |
| 19 | 129.1, CH | 7.67, d (8.3) | - | - |
| OMe | 55.8, CH3 | 3.69, s | 55.9, CH3 | 3.75, s |
| OH | - | 7.80, brs | - | - |
1 Chemical shifts were determined through HMBC correlations.
Figure 2COSY (bold bonds) and important HMBC (arrows) correlations observed for compounds 1 and 2.
1H (400 MHz) and 13C (50 MHz) NMR data in CDCl3 of compounds 3 and 4.
| Position | 3 | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 167.2, C 1 | - | 167.6, C | - |
| 2 | 91.7, C | - | 91.7, C | - |
| 3 | 191.2, C | - | 191.3, C | - |
| 4 | 104.6, CH | 5.68, s | 103.3, CH | 5.69, s |
| 5 | 175.3, C | - | 176.2, C | - |
| 6 | 30.7, CH2 | 1.98, q (7.6) | 30.7, CH2 | 1.98, q (7.6) |
| 7 | 7.3, CH3 | 0.97, t (7.6) | 7.3, CH3 | 0.96, t (7.6) |
| 8 | 40.2, CH | 2.41, m | 33.0, CH | 2.64, septet (6.8) |
| 9 | 26.5, CH2 | 1.68, m, 1.54, m | 19.2, CH3 | 1.22, d (6.8) |
| 10 | 11.4, CH3 | 0.92, t (7.4) | 19.3, CH3 | 1.23, d (6.8) |
| 11 | 17.1, CH3 | 1.20, d (6.9) | - | - |
| OH | - | 9.36, brs | - | 9.35, brs |
1 Chemical shifts were determined through HMBC correlations.
Figure 3COSY (bold bonds) and important HMBC (arrows) correlations observed for compounds 3 and 4.