Literature DB >> 29667606

Applying a new computer-aided detection scheme generated imaging marker to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei1, Alan B Hollingsworth, Bhavika Patel, Morteza Heidari, Hong Liu, Bin Zheng.   

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of identifying a new quantitative imaging marker based on false-positives generated by a computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme to help predict short-term breast cancer risk. An image dataset including four view mammograms acquired from 1044 women was retrospectively assembled. All mammograms were originally interpreted as negative by radiologists. In the next subsequent mammography screening, 402 women were diagnosed with breast cancer and 642 remained negative. An existing CAD scheme was applied 'as is' to process each image. From CAD-generated results, four detection features including the total number of (1) initial detection seeds and (2) the final detected false-positive regions, (3) average and (4) sum of detection scores, were computed from each image. Then, by combining the features computed from two bilateral images of left and right breasts from either craniocaudal or mediolateral oblique view, two logistic regression models were trained and tested using a leave-one-case-out cross-validation method to predict the likelihood of each testing case being positive in the next subsequent screening. The new prediction model yielded the maximum prediction accuracy with an area under a ROC curve of AUC  =  0.65  ±  0.017 and the maximum adjusted odds ratio of 4.49 with a 95% confidence interval of (2.95, 6.83). The results also showed an increasing trend in the adjusted odds ratio and risk prediction scores (p  <  0.01). Thus, this study demonstrated that CAD-generated false-positives might include valuable information, which needs to be further explored for identifying and/or developing more effective imaging markers for predicting short-term breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29667606      PMCID: PMC5976448          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabefe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.

Authors:  R L Birdwell; D M Ikeda; K F O'Shaughnessy; E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Reduction of bias and variance for evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Fusion of Quantitative Image and Genomic Biomarkers to Improve Prognosis Assessment of Early Stage Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nastaran Emaminejad; Wei Qian; Yubao Guan; Maxine Tan; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Wei Qian; Jiantao Pu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  5 in total

1.  Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Wei Liu; Alan B Hollingsworth; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Improving mammography lesion classification by optimal fusion of handcrafted and deep transfer learning features.

Authors:  Meredith A Jones; Rowzat Faiz; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Developing a Quantitative Ultrasound Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Assess Tumor Treatment Efficacy Using a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Joshua VanOsdol; Morteza Heidari; Gopichandh Danala; Sri Nandhini Sethuraman; Ashish Ranjan; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.

Authors:  Meredith A Jones; Warid Islam; Rozwat Faiz; Xuxin Chen; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Developing global image feature analysis models to predict cancer risk and prognosis.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Yuchen Qiu; Faranak Aghaei; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Morteza Heidari; Gopichandh Danala
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.