| Literature DB >> 29238521 |
Hong-Yi Liu1,2, Fei Xue1, Jie Gong1, Qiu-Hong Wan1, Sheng-Guo Fang1.
Abstract
Amphibians can be more vulnerable to environmental changes and diseases than other species because of their complex life cycle and physiological requirements. Therefore, understanding the adaptation of amphibians to environmental changes is crucial for their conservation. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presents an excellent tool for the investigation of adaptive variations and the assessment of adaptive potential because it can be under strong diversifying selection. Here, we isolated the MHC class II B (MHCIIB) gene from cDNA sequences of the black-spotted frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus), a widespread amphibian species in China, and designed locus-specific primers to characterize adaptive variability of this amphibian. Ten alleles were identified from 67 individual frogs of three populations and no more than two alleles were present in each individual animal. Furthermore, none of the sequences had indels or/and stop codons, which is in good agreement with locus-specific amplification of a functional gene. However, we found low polymorphism at both nucleotide and amino acid levels, even in the antigen-binding region. Purifying selection acting at this locus was supported by the findings that the dN/dS ratio across all alleles was below 1 and that negatively selected sites were detected by different methods. Allele frequency distributions were significantly different among geographic populations, indicating that physiographic factors may have strong effect on the genetic structure of the black-spotted frog. This study revealed limited polymorphism of three adjacent black-spotted frog populations at the functional MHCIIB locus, which may be attributed to region-specific differences. The locus-specific genotyping technique developed in this study would provide a foundation for future studies on adaptive divergence among different frog populations.Entities:
Keywords: black‐spotted frog; major histocompatibility complex; population genetic structure; purifying selection
Year: 2017 PMID: 29238521 PMCID: PMC5723586 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1An adult black‐spotted frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus). The photograph was taken by Hong‐Yi Liu
Primers used in genome walking strategy to amplify exon 2 and intron 1 and 2 regions of the MHCIIB gene from the black‐spotted frog
| Sequences | Specific primers (5′→3′) | Primers from the kit (5′→3′) |
|---|---|---|
| Exon 2 | TSP1: GACGGAGGATATCAGATATATG | DW‐ACP1: ACP1‐AGGTC |
| DW‐ACP2: ACP1‐TGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP3: ACP3‐GGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP4: ACP4‐CGGTC | ||
| TSP2: TGGAGCATCACGTTTACAATCA | DW‐ACPN: ACPN‐GGTC | |
| TSP3: ACAATCAGGAGGAGTTCATGT | Uni‐primer: TCACAGAAGTATGCCAAGCGA | |
| Intron 1 | TSP1′: ACATGAACTCCTCCTGATTGTA | DW‐ACP1: ACP1‐AGGTC |
| DW‐ACP2: ACP1‐TGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP3: ACP3‐GGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP4: ACP4‐CGGTC | ||
| TSP2′: TAAACGTGATGCTCCATATATC | DW‐ACPN: ACPN‐GGTC | |
| TSP3′: ATATATCTGATATCCTCCGTC | Uni‐primer: TCACAGAAGTATGCCAAGCGA | |
| Intron 2 | 2TSP1: ATATCAGATATATGGAGCATCAC | DW‐ACP1: ACP1‐AGGTC |
| DW‐ACP2: ACP1‐TGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP3: ACP3‐GGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP4: ACP4‐CGGTC | ||
| 2TSP2: GTTTACAATCAGGAGGAGTTC | DW‐ACPN: ACPN‐GGTC | |
| 2TSP3: GGATTCTTCATTGGCATAACC | Uni‐primer: TCACAGAAGTATGCCAAGCGA | |
| Intron 1 | 2TSP1′: CGTGATGCTCCATATATCTGAT | DW‐ACP1: ACP1‐AGGTC |
| DW‐ACP2: ACP1‐TGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP3: ACP3‐GGGTC | ||
| DW‐ACP4: ACP4‐CGGTC | ||
| 2TSP2′: TCATCATCACACTAGGGTCAC | DW‐ACPN: ACPN‐GGTC | |
| 2TSP3′: ACATTGGCGGTATTACCTCATC | Uni‐primer: TCACAGAAGTATGCCAAGCGA |
Parameters of genetic diversity for the black‐spotted frog based on different markers
| Nucleotide level | Amino acid level | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | ABS | All | ABS | |||||
| Number of alleles | Number of variable sites | Number of alleles | Number of variable sites | Number of alleles | Number of variable sites | Number of alleles | Number of variable sites | |
| MHCIIB | 10 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
| MHCIA | 25 | 85 | 24 | 33 | 25 | 40 | 24 | 13 |
| SSR | 6.33 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
Forty samples from the Jinhua population were used. Genetic diversity was investigated using a 279‐bp MHCIA fragment comprising 15 codons coding antigen‐binding sites, which is much less than in the MHCIIB gene. (Gong et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013).
Thirty‐five samples from the Jinhua population were used. Thirteen polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers were developed and characterized. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 to 12 with an average of 6.33. (Gong, 2012; Gong, et al., 2010).
Figure 2Amino acid sequence alignment of MHCIIB alleles from the black‐spotted frog. Purifying selection‐affected sites identified by all three methods (SLAC, FEL, and IFEL) or only one method (FEL) are marked with circle and triangles, respectively. Putative ABSs were defined according to the human sequence and are marked with asterisks
Average rates of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions in the ABS and non‐ABS of the MHCIIB gene from the black‐spotted frog
| Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABS | 22 | 0.004 ± 0.004 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | NC | .154 |
| Non‐ABS | 65 | 0.010 ± 0.005 | 0.028 ± 0.018 | 0.357 | .179 |
| All | 87 | 0.009 ± 0.004 | 0.020 ± 0.013 | 0.450 | .197 |
N, number of codons in each region; d, average rate of nonsynonymous (d N) or synonymous (d S) substitutions per codon ± SE; and p, significance of assuming positive selection (d N > d S) or purifying selection (d N < d S) analyzed by the Z‐test; NC, no calculation.
Figure 3Allele distributions and relative frequencies of the MHCIIB gene in three geographic populations of the black‐spotted frog. Each allele is represented by a different color
Allele frequencies and heterozygosity of the MHCIIB gene in three geographic populations of the black‐spotted frog
| Allele | Population | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| YBS | YBN | LZS | |
| Peni‐B*01 | 0.6957 | 0.5000 | 0.5806 |
| Peni‐B*02 | / | 0.1538 | / |
| Peni‐B*03 | / | 0.1154 | / |
| Peni‐B*04 | / | 0.0385 | / |
| Peni‐B*05 | / | 0.0385 | / |
| Peni‐B*06 | 0.1957 | / | 0.1935 |
| Peni‐B*07 | 0.0217 | 0.0385 | 0.0484 |
| Peni‐B*08 | 0.0870 | 0.1154 | 0.0806 |
| Peni‐B*09 | / | / | 0.0323 |
| Peni‐B*10 | / | / | 0.0645 |
|
| 0.39130 | 0.53846 | 0.58065 |
|
| 0.48019 | 0.72308 | 0.62136 |
|
| .12865 | .03176 | .03905 |
Pairwise FST values (below the diagonal) and the significance of their differences (above the diagonal) determined for three geographic populations of the black‐spotted frog
| YBS | YBN | LZS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBS | 0.00000 |
| − |
| YBN | 0.06856 | 0.00000 | − |
| LZS | −0.00185 | 0.04045 | 0.00000 |
Significance of FST values is indicated as “+” (p < .05) and “−” (p > .05).
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree of MHCIIB partial exon 2 from the black‐spotted frog and other species (P. lessonae, P. kurtmuelleri, R. yavapaiensis, R. omeimontis, L. hochstetteri, A. sinensis, and N. nippon). The credibility value for each node is shown above the branches. Each branch length is proportional to estimated DNA sequence changes (0.08 substitutions per site)