Literature DB >> 29234924

A new direction in anastomotic research: should we redesign the 'angle of sorrow'?

Omar E Aly1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in oncological outcomes in colo-rectal surgery, rates of anastomotic leak have not improved. The precise mechanisms of anastomotic leak remain poorly understood. Current research has focused on anastomotic reinforcement to tackle anastomotic leak with little success. The 'Angle of Sorrow', the corner of the anastomosis is prone to anastomotic leak, but remains a persistent feature in the gastrointestinal anastomosis. The tendency for stress forces to concentrate in the vulnerable 'Angle of Sorrow' prompts the need for anastomotic design research. AIM: The aim of this study is to explore if redesigning the 'Angle of Sorrow' can reduce the stress forces in the ileocolic anastomosis.
METHODS: A simulation-based experimental study compared two anastomotic designs: traditional Slit Enterotomy Anastomosis (SEA) vs a novel Radiused Enterotomy Anastomosis (REA). The finite element analysis simulations were performed using FEBIO to measure peak sheer stress in pressurised bowel.
RESULTS: Tissue stress was found to concentrate at the 'Angles of Sorrow' in traditional anastomosis design while the REA design distributed sheer stress across the anastomosis. The SEA model had greater peak sheer stress factors than REA for the hand-sewn and stapled 'Barcelona' anastomosis (1.58 (k) vs 0.64 (k), 0.91 (k) vs 0.63 (k)). The REA anastomosis resulted in significantly less peak stress across all anastomotic experiments (p = 0.0047). The mucosa of the SEA model tended to unfavourably evert.
CONCLUSION: Redesigning the 'Angle of Sorrow' decreased tissue stress concentration. The direction of future anastomotic research may involve going back to the drawing board, rather than attempting to reinforce a potentially flawed design. Despite advances in colorectal surgery, rates of anastomotic leak have not improved. The 'Angle of Sorrow', the corner of the anastomosis is prone to anastomotic leak, but remains a persistent feature in gastrointestinal anastomosis. The direction of future research may involve going back to redesign this vulnerable area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Angle of sorrow; Bowel anastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29234924     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2945-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

Review 1.  Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Yule; R Flin; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

3.  Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think.

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Thomas L Manchester; Turner Osler; Betsy Burns; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J M Burch; R J Franciose; E E Moore; W L Biffl; P J Offner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Is early detection of anastomotic leakage possible by intraperitoneal microdialysis and intraperitoneal cytokines after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer?

Authors:  Peter Matthiessen; Ida Strand; Kjell Jansson; Cathrine Törnquist; Magnus Andersson; Jörgen Rutegård; Lars Norgren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Experimental evaluation of a bovine pericardium-derived collagen matrix buttress in ileocolic and colon anastomoses.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Gonzalo F Hagerman; Michael J Potter; Richard E Karulf
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Increase of serum C-reactive protein is an early indicator of subsequent symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection.

Authors:  P Matthiessen; M Henriksson; O Hallböök; E Grunditz; B Norén; G Arbman
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Erica M Carlisle; John C Alverdy; Konstantin Umanskiy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  The effects of mechanical forces on intestinal physiology and pathology.

Authors:  Christopher P Gayer; Marc D Basson
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.315

10.  After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Niels Komen; Jan-Willem Dijk; Zarina Lalmahomed; Karel Klop; Wim Hop; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Hans Jeekel; W Ruud Schouten; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.