Literature DB >> 19630064

Experimental evaluation of a bovine pericardium-derived collagen matrix buttress in ileocolic and colon anastomoses.

Wolfgang B Gaertner1, Gonzalo F Hagerman, Michael J Potter, Richard E Karulf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication of colorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare stapled ileocolic and colon-colon anastomoses with or without a collagen buttress derived from bovine pericardium in the immediate postoperative period.
METHODS: Various stapling devices were used to create ileocolic and colon-colon anastomoses in a canine model. Ileocolic anastomoses were created by simulating two different techniques: "open" and "laparoscopic". Colon-colon anastomoses were created by using a double-stapled technique. A total of 27 colon anastomoses (13 left colon-colon, 8 right "laparoscopic", and 6 right "open") were created. Anastomoses buttressed with bovine pericardium (n = 15) were compared to anastomoses without any reinforcement (n = 12). Staple lines were evaluated 4 hours after operation. Evaluation included bursting pressure and bursting location.
RESULTS: No stapler device malfunction occurred. Excision rings were complete in all colon-colon anastomoses. All non-buttressed anastomoses burst at the staple line, whereas with buttressed anastomoses the adjacent intestine burst (p = 0.0001). The intestinal bursting pressure of bowel segments with buttressed staple lines (mean, 362 mmHg) was significantly higher than the bursting pressure of non-buttressed staple lines (mean, 204 mmHg, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The use of a collagen matrix buttress derived from bovine pericardium in stapled ileocolic and colon-colon anastomoses was safe. Buttressed anastomoses showed greater bursting strength as compared to non-buttressed anastomoses in the immediate postoperative period in a canine model. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19630064     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  6 in total

1.  Autobuttressing of colorectal anastomoses using a mesenteric flap.

Authors:  H M Mohan; D C Winter
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 2.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

3.  A new direction in anastomotic research: should we redesign the 'angle of sorrow'?

Authors:  Omar E Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Bovine pericardium patch wrapping intestinal anastomosis improves healing process and prevents leakage in a pig model.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Angela Gurrado; Piero Portincasa; Salvatore Scacco; Andrea Marzullo; Giuseppe Piccinni; Germana Lissidini; Luigi Greco; Maria Antonietta De Salvia; Leonilde Bonfrate; Lucantonio Debellis; Nicola Sardaro; Francesco Staffieri; Maria Rosaria Carratù; Antonio Crovace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  International consensus statement regarding the use of animal models for research on anastomoses in the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Joanna W A M Bosmans; Martine Moossdorff; Mahdi Al-Taher; Lotte van Beek; Joep P M Derikx; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A Novel, Easy-to-Use Staple Line Reinforcement for Surgical Staplers.

Authors:  Jordan B Wong; Dwight D Henninger; Jeffrey W Clymer; Crystal D Ricketts; Raymond S Fryrear
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-01-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.