Literature DB >> 29230518

Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks.

Bülent Cengiz1, Doğa Vurallı2, Murat Zinnuroğlu2, Gözde Bayer3, Hassan Golmohammadzadeh4, Zafer Günendi2, Ali Emre Turgut5, Bülent İrfanoğlu4, Kutluk Bilge Arıkan4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between action observation (AO)-related corticomotor excitability changes and phases of observed action and to explore the effects of pure AO and concurrent AO and motor imagery (MI) state on corticomotor excitability using TMS. It was also investigated whether the mirror neuron system activity is muscle-specific. Fourteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. EMG recordings were taken from the right first dorsal interosseous and the abductor digiti minimi muscles. There was a significant main effect of TMS timing (after the beginning of the movement, at the beginning of motor output state, and during black screen) on the mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Mean MEP amplitudes for AO combined with MI were significantly higher than pure AO session. There was a significant interaction between session and TMS timing. There was no significant main effect of muscle on MEP amplitude. The results indicate that corticomotor excitability is modulated by different phases of the observed motor movement and this modulation is not muscle-specific. Simultaneous MI and AO enhance corticomotor excitability significantly compared to pure AO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Corticomotor excitability; Motor imagery; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29230518     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5147-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability.

Authors:  Jacqueline Williams; Alan J Pearce; Michela Loporto; Tony Morris; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Observing and perceiving: A combined approach to induce plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Laura Avanzino; Nicolas Gueugneau; Thierry Pozzo; Piero Ruggeri; Marco Bove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  The mirror neuron system: a fresh view.

Authors:  Antonino Casile; Vittorio Caggiano; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Task-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability during observation and motor imagery of balance tasks.

Authors:  A Mouthon; J Ruffieux; M Wälchli; M Keller; W Taube
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system.

Authors:  Caroline Catmur; Vincent Walsh; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans?

Authors:  M Jonas; H R Siebner; K Biermann-Ruben; K Kessler; T Bäumer; C Büchel; A Schnitzler; A Münchau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Fausto Caruana; Ahmad Jezzini; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Combined action observation and imagery facilitates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Jacqueline Williams; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Daniel L Eaves; Martin Riach; Paul S Holmes; David J Wright
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural mechanism of selective finger movement independent of synergistic movement.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Aoyama; Fuminari Kaneko; Yukari Ohashi; Yutaka Kohno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparison of the on-line effects of different motor simulation conditions on corticospinal excitability in healthy participants.

Authors:  C Pfenninger; S Grosprêtre; A Remontet; T Lapole
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Modulation of Motor Cortical Activities by Action Observation and Execution in Patients with Stroke: An MEG Study.

Authors:  Jun-Ding Zhu; Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Yi-Jhan Tseng; Chien-Chen Chou; Chih-Chi Chen; Yu-Wei Hsieh; Yu-Hsien Liao
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Low-Cost Robotic Guide Based on a Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface for Arm Assisted Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Eduardo Quiles; Ferran Suay; Gemma Candela; Nayibe Chio; Manuel Jiménez; Leandro Álvarez-Kurogi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Effects of Instruction Manipulation on Motor Performance Following Action Observation.

Authors:  Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Moshe Einat; Zvi Kozol
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.