| Literature DB >> 29228952 |
Christopher M Haggerty1,2, Jonathan D Suever3,4, Arichanah Pulenthiran3,4, Abba Mejia-Spiegeler3,4, Gregory J Wehner5, Linyuan Jing3,4, Richard J Charnigo6, Brandon K Fornwalt3,4,7, Mark A Fogel8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) have progressive, adverse biventricular remodeling, leading to abnormal contractile mechanics. Defining the mechanisms underlying this dysfunction, such as diffuse myocardial fibrosis, may provide insights into poor long-term outcomes. We hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) diffuse fibrosis is related to impaired LV mechanics.Entities:
Keywords: DENSE; MOLLI; Strain; T1 mapping; Tetralogy of Fallot
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29228952 PMCID: PMC5724335 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0410-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Demographic and ventricular volume details for 40 patients with repaired TOF
| Result | Z-score | |
|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | 25.5 ± 10.5 | |
| Sex | Male: 23; Female: 17 | |
| BSA [m2] | 1.7 ± 0.3 | |
| LV EDVi [mL/ m2] | 72.8 ± 13.3 | −0.6 ± 1.1 |
| LV ESVi [mL/ m2] | 32.8 ± 7.3 | |
| LV Massi [g/ m2] | 53.1 ± 8.1 | −0.7 ± 0.9 |
| LV EF [%] | 54.9 ± 7.3 | −2.0 ± 1.6 |
| LV LGE (% of pts) | 37.5 | |
| RV EDVi [mL/ m2] | 145.1 ± 44.9 | 4.6 ± 3.1 |
| RV ESVi [mL/ m2] | 82.0 ± 36.7 | |
| RV EF [%] | 44.1 ± 10.2 | −3.1 ± 2.5 |
| Pulmonary Regurgitation [%] | 31.9 ± 19.2 |
BSA body surface area, EDV indexed end-diastolic volume, EF ejection fraction, ESV indexed end-systolic volume, LV left ventricular, Mass indexed myocardial mass, RV right ventricular
Fig. 1Example MOLLI T1 and DENSE images. Top row shows Pre- and Post-Contrast MOLLI T1 images for a representative patient. Bottom row shows DENSE magnitude and phase images for the same patient and same slice near end-systole, as well as the resulting displacement vectors at the same instant. The derived measures from each imaging sequence are listed for clarity
Primary imaging findings
|
| |
| Native T1 [ms] | 952 ± 73 |
| Post-Contrast T1 [ms] | 414 ± 54 |
| λGd | 0.458 ± 0.051 |
| ECV | 0.245 ± 0.051 |
|
| |
| Peak Circumferential Strain [%] | −15.0 ± 2.8 |
| Peak Radial Strain [%] | 29.3 ± 8.3 |
| DI [ms] | 16.1 ± 8.4 |
| Systolic Circumferential SR [%/s] | −93 ± 17 |
| Diastolic Circumferential SR [%/s] | 127 ± 35 |
λ gadolinium partition coefficient; ECV extracellular volume fraction, SR strain rate, DI dyssynchrony index
Fig. 2Box Plots of Circumferential and Radial Strains and ECV Results. Measures of a) extracellular volume fraction (ECV), b) peak circumferential strain, c) dyssynchrony index (DI), and d) peak radial strain represented as boxplots. Data are shown for each region (Base, Mid-ventricle, and Apex) as well as the global average (“Mean”) across slices
Fig. 3Bullseye Plots for Segmental Means. ECV (left), circumferential (middle) and radial strain (right) data presented with respect to the standard 16-segment left ventricular (LV) model. The mean of each segment is overlaid on the segment and graphically represented by the color relative to the other segments
Results of mixed model analyses for LV regional measures
| Outcome | T1-based predictor | Standardized β | Predictor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial Strain | λGd | −0.33 | <0.001 a |
| Radial Strain | ECV | −0.36 | 0.002 a |
| Radial Strain | Post-contrast T1 | 0.27 | 0.01 a |
| Circumferential Strain | λGd | 0.09 | 0.27 |
| Circumferential Strain | ECV | 0.11 | 0.31 |
| Circumferential Strain | Post-contrast T1 | −0.22 | 0.05 |
| log(DI) | λGd | 0.47 | <0.001 a |
| log(DI) | ECV | 0.67 | <0.001 a |
| log(DI) | Post-contrast T1 | −0.33 | 0.01 a |
| Systolic Circumferential SR | λGd | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| Systolic Circumferential SR | ECV | 0.13 | 0.26 |
| Systolic Circumferential SR | Post-contrast T1 | −0.30 | 0.014 a |
| Diastolic Circumferential SR | λGd | −0.15 | 0.10 |
| Diastolic Circumferential SR | ECV | −0.22 | 0.05 |
| log(Diastolic Circumferential SR) | Post-contrast T1 | 0.37 | <0.001 a |
λ gadolinium partition coefficient, ECV extracellular volume fraction, SR strain rate, DI dyssynchrony index
a statistical significance retained after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment
Fig. 4T1-Based Measures are Associated with LV Mechanics. Scatter plots demonstrating the regional multivariate models in which ECV is associated with a) the log-adjusted LV dyssynchrony index (DI) and b) peak LV radial strain, and c) post-contrast T1 predicts the log-adjusted LV diastolic circumferential strain rate. The standardized β coefficient of the primary independent variable is reported in each case
Results of mixed model analyses for LV segmental measures
| Outcome | T1-based predictor | Standardized β | Predictor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial Strain | λGd | 0.002 | 0.97 |
| Radial Strain | ECV | 0.007 | 0.90 |
| Radial Strain | Post-contrast T1 | 0.04 | 0.48 |
| Circumferential Strain | λGd | −0.04 | 0.33 |
| Circumferential Strain | ECV | −0.03 | 0.55 |
| Circumferential Strain | Post-contrast T1 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
λ gadolinium partition coefficient, ECV extracellular volume fraction
Fig. 5Reproducibility of T1 mapping. Bland-Altman comparisons of intra- (top) and inter-observer (bottom) analyses of T1 mapping data with respect to the quantification of post-contrast T1 (left), λGd (middle), and ECV (right). In addition to the bias and limits of agreement, the mean coefficient of variation (COV) is reported for each plot