| Literature DB >> 29228911 |
Vanessa E Torbenson1, Mary Catherine Tolcher1, Kate M Nesbitt1, Christopher E Colby2, Sherif A El-Nashar3, Bobbie S Gostout1, Amy L Weaver4, Michaela E Mc Gree4, Abimbola O Famuyide5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) affects 2-4/1000 live births with outcomes ranging from negligible neurological deficits to severe neuromuscular dysfunction, cerebral palsy and death. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is the sub cohort of NE that appears to be driven by intrapartum events. Our objective was to identify antepartum and intrapartum factors associated with the development of neonatal HIE.Entities:
Keywords: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; Intrapartum factors; Neonatal encephalopathy; Risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29228911 PMCID: PMC5725836 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1610-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1Flow diagram of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy case selection
Maternal and neonatal characteristics of cases and controls
| Characteristics | Cases | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal | |||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 26.7 (3.8) | 26.6 (3.7) | 0.97 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 25.7 (5.8) | 26.1 (6.0) | 0.77 |
| Medicaid insurance, N (%) | 6 (23.1%) | 34 (32.7%) | 0.34 |
| Race, N (%) | 0.08 | ||
| Caucasian | 18 (69.2) | 89 (85.6) | |
| Black or African American | 5 (19.2) | 4 (3.8) | |
| Asian | 2 (7.7) | 6 (5.8) | |
| Other | 1 (3.8) | 3 (2.9) | |
| Unknown | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.9) | |
| Nulliparous, N (%) | 14 (53.8) | 41 (39.4) | 0.18 |
| Neonatal | |||
| Male sex, N (%) | 18 (69.2) | 63 (60.6) | 0.42 |
| Gestational age (weeks), median (IQR) | 39 (38, 40) | 39 (38, 40) | 0.94 |
| Birth weight (grams), mean (SD) | 3514 (596) | 3448 (530) | 0.58 |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation
aComparisons evaluated using the chi-square for sex, nulliparous and Medicaid insurance, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for gestational age, the two-sample t-test for birth weight, maternal age and BMI, and the Fisher’s exact test for maternal race
Clinical and labor characteristics evaluated as risk factors for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
| Characteristic | Cases | Controls | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysisg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |||
| Prior cesarean delivery | 6 (23.1%) | 11 (10.6%) | 2.53 (0.83, 7.75) | 0.10 | ||
| Chronic hypertension | 2 (7.7%) | 1 (1.0%) | 8.00 (0.72, 88.23) | 0.09 | ||
| Gestational diabetes | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (3.8%) | 1.00 (0.02, 10.11) | 1.00 | ||
| Fetal growth restriction | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.9%) | 1.66 (0, 13.89) | 1.00 | ||
| Oligohydramnios | 1 (3.8%) | 2 (1.9%) | 2.00 (0.18, 22.06) | 0.57 | ||
| Preterm labor | 2 (7.7%) | 4 (3.8%) | 2.67 (0.33, 21.54) | 0.36 | ||
| Meconium-stained amniotic fluida | 11 (42.3%) | 16 (15.4%) | 4.62 (1.63, 13.06) | 0.004 | 12.41 (2.10, 144.83) | 0.002 |
| Chorioamnionitis | 2 (7.7%) | 3 (2.9%) | 3.15 (0.43, 23.36) | 0.26 | ||
| Oxytocin use | 14 (53.8%) | 50 (48.1%) | 1.26 (0.53, 3.00) | 0.60 | ||
| Abnormal first stage of laborb,c | 12/17 (70.6%) | 48/94 (51.1%) | 2.19 (0.71, 6.76) | 0.17 | ||
| Prolonged second stage of labord | 5/17 (29.4%) | 4/91 (4.4%) | 11.24 (1.92, 65.58) | 0.007 | 9.49 (1.06, 135.30) | 0.042 |
| Any sentinel or acute evente | 6 (23.1%) | 0 (0%) | 32.66 (6.18, infinity) | < 0.001 | 74.86 (11.86, infinity) | < 0.001 |
| Any ‘category 3’ segment in the last hour of laborf | 7/25 (28.0%) | 4/101 (4.0%) | 7.30 (2.11, 25.30) | 0.002 | ||
aMeconium-stained amniotic fluid present either before or after 6 cm of dilation
bThe first stage of labor could not be classified for 9 HIE cases and 10 controls because they either have a cesarean section without laboring (N = 5 cases and N = 6 controls) or they first presented at 10 cm (N = 2 controls) or they never reached an active phase before proceeding to a cesarean section (N = 1 case and N = 1 control) or they only had 1 measurement in the active phase before proceeding to a cesarean section (N = 3 case and N = 1 control)
cAbnormal first stage of labor included patients with protracted labor (cervical dilation <1.2 cm per hour), secondary arrest (lack of cervical dilation for >2 h after patient reached 7 cm) and combined disorders (patients with both protracted labor and secondary arrest)
dThe second stage of labor could not be classified for 9 HIE cases and 13 controls because they either have a cesarean section without laboring (N = 5 cases and N = 6 controls) or they did not reach 10 cm before proceeding to a cesarean section (N = 4 cases and N = 7 controls)
eA sentinel event was defined as an acute event that emergently altered the course of labor; these included uterine rupture, cord prolapse, placental abruption, fetal exsanguination/vasa previa, amniotic fluid embolism, and maternal collapse
fOne HIE case and 3 controls had insufficient information for categorizing the fetal heart tracings
gMultivariable exact conditional logistic regression models were fit considering all variables with p < 0.20 based on univariate analysis and first examining all one-variable models, all two-variable models, and all three-variable models. Variables were retained in the final multivariable model if p < 0.05
Comparison of the fetal heart rate tracing categorizations during the first hour after admission and last hour prior to delivery
| Predominant category during the first hour of admission, N (%)a | Cases | Controls ( |
|
| 0.20 | |||
| Category 1 | 14 (58.3%) | 71 (71.0%) | |
| Category 1 or 2 | 2 (8.3%) | 6 (5.8%) | |
| Category 2 | 7 (29.2%) | 2 (23.1%) | |
| Category 2 or 3 | 1 (4.2%) | 0 | |
| Category 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Predominant category during the last hour prior to delivery, N (%)a | Cases | Controls |
|
| 0.02 | |||
| Category 1 | 1 (4.0%) | 8 (7.9%) | |
| Category 1 or 2 | 1 (4.0%) | 11 (10.9%) | |
| Category 2 | 20 (80.0%) | 82 (81.2%) | |
| Category 2 or 3 | 2 (8.0%) | 0 | |
| Category 3 | 1 (4.0%) | 0 |
Abbreviation: FHR fetal heart rate tracings
aFor each patient the predominant category was defined as the most common rating among the four 15-min segments from the FHR tracings using the consensus ratings
bOf the 26 HIE cases, 24 had FHR tracings available during the first hour after admission (20 had 4 interpretable segments, 3 had 3 interpretable segments, and 1 had 1 interpretable segment)
cOf the 104 controls, 100 had FHR tracings available during the first hour after admission (80 had 4 interpretable segments, 11 had 3 interpretable segments, 5 had 2 interpretable segments, and 4 had 1 interpretable segment)
dOf the 26 HIE cases, 25 had FHR tracings available during the last hour prior to delivery (23 had 4 interpretable segments, 1 had 3 interpretable segments, and 1 had 1 interpretable segment)
eOf the 104 controls, 101 had FHR tracings available during the last hour prior to delivery (85 had 4 interpretable segments, 9 had 3 interpretable segments, 4 had 2 interpretable segments, and 3 had 1 interpretable segment)
f P-value based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test taking into account the ordinal nature of the predominant category