Literature DB >> 29898997

Revisiting the Lyme Disease Serodiagnostic Algorithm: the Momentum Gathers.

Adriana R Marques1.   

Abstract

Lyme disease is a tick-borne illness caused by Borreliella (Borrelia) burgdorferi, and it is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States, with an estimated incidence of 300,000 cases per year. The currently recommended approach for laboratory support of the diagnosis of Lyme disease is a standard two-tiered (STT) algorithm comprised of an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence assay (IFA), followed by Western blotting (WB). The STT algorithm has low sensitivity in early infection, and there are drawbacks associated with the WB use in practice. Modified two-tiered (MTT) algorithms have been shown to improve the sensitivity of the testing in early disease while maintaining high specificity. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, A. Pegalajar-Jurado et al. (J Clin Microbiol 56:e01943-17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01943-17) report the results of their evaluation of the Liaison VlsE CLIA, the Captia B. burgdorferi IgG/IgM EIA, and the C6 B. burgdorferi (Lyme) EIA as MTT algorithms compared with results with the STT algorithm using the same tests as the first-tier test and the ViraStripe IgM and IgG WBs as the second-tier test. The results showed that all MTT algorithms had higher sensitivities than STT algorithms and were highly specific. These results showed that MTT approaches are a valid alternative to the currently recommended STT algorithm for serodiagnosis of Lyme disease, opening the door for the development of rapid diagnostics and point-of-care testing that can provide diagnostic information during the initial patient visit.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29898997      PMCID: PMC6062820          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00749-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  33 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of peptide-antigen immunoassays for Lyme disease.

Authors:  Richard B Porwancher
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease.

Authors:  John A Branda; Klemen Strle; Lise E Nigrovic; Paul M Lantos; Timothy J Lepore; Nitin S Damle; Mary Jane Ferraro; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Rapid, simple, quantitative, and highly sensitive antibody detection for lyme disease.

Authors:  Peter D Burbelo; Alexandra T Issa; Kathryn H Ching; Jeffrey I Cohen; Michael J Iadarola; Adriana Marques
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-04-14

4.  Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Lyme Borreliosis Serology: Performance of Several Commonly Used Laboratory Diagnostic Tests and a Large Resource Panel of Well-Characterized Patient Samples.

Authors:  Claudia R Molins; Mark J Delorey; Christopher Sexton; Martin E Schriefer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of a sequential enzyme immunoassay testing algorithm for Lyme disease demonstrates lack of test independence but high diagnostic specificity.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Claudia R Molins; Andrew Levin; Susan C Lipsett; Lise E Nigrovic; Martin E Schriefer; John A Branda
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Martin Schriefer; Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Andrew Levin; Allen C Steere; Robert B Nadelman; John Nowakowski; Adriana Marques; Barbara J B Johnson; J Stephen Dumler
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Lyme disease testing by large commercial laboratories in the United States.

Authors:  Alison F Hinckley; Neeta P Connally; James I Meek; Barbara J Johnson; Melissa M Kemperman; Katherine A Feldman; Jennifer L White; Paul S Mead
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of two-tiered testing strategies for serodiagnosis of lyme disease with noncutaneous manifestations.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Andrew Levin; Sandeep Soman; Omosalewa Adenikinju; Michael V Longo; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Serodiagnosis of Lyme disease by kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant VlsE1 or peptide antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi compared with 2-tiered testing using whole-cell lysates.

Authors:  Rendi Murphree Bacon; Brad J Biggerstaff; Martin E Schriefer; Robert D Gilmore; Mario T Philipp; Allen C Steere; Gary P Wormser; Adriana R Marques; Barbara J B Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Fully Automated Multiplex Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease with High Specificity and Improved Early Sensitivity.

Authors:  Johnnie B Hahm; John W Breneman; Jing Liu; Svetlana Rabkina; Weiming Zheng; Shuxia Zhou; Roger P Walker; Ravi Kaul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Modified two-tiered testing algorithm for Lyme disease serology: the Canadian context.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 3.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Association of Presenting Symptoms With Abnormal Laboratory Values for Vector-Borne Illness - Experience in an Urban Gastroenterology Practice.

Authors:  Michael D Erdman; Niloofar Kossari; Jessica Ye; Kristen H Reynolds; Emily Blodget; B Robert Mozayeni; Farshid Sam Rahbar
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 5.  Lyme Disease Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Jenifer Coburn; Brandon Garcia; Linden T Hu; Mollie W Jewett; Peter Kraiczy; Steven J Norris; Jon Skare
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  Antiphospholipid autoantibodies in Lyme disease arise after scavenging of host phospholipids by Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Peter J Gwynne; Luke H Clendenen; Siu-Ping Turk; Adriana R Marques; Linden T Hu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Lyme Disease Biosensors: A Potential Solution to a Diagnostic Dilemma.

Authors:  Connor Flynn; Anna Ignaszak
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 8.  Comparison of Lyme Disease in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques; Franc Strle; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Characteristics and outcome of facial nerve palsy from Lyme neuroborreliosis in the United States.

Authors:  Adriana Marques; Grace Okpali; Kelly Liepshutz; Ana Maria Ortega-Villa
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.