Literature DB >> 2922665

Hypersensitivity reaction associated with sterile ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction.

R B Snow1, N Kossovsky.   

Abstract

Infection and obstruction remain significant problems associated with shunts. We studied the clinical and pathological findings in 29 patients who underwent surgical procedures to revise malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunts. The preoperative diagnosis for shunt malfunction was infection in 8 cases, and obstruction in 18 cases. A pathologist NK independently examined the shunt hardware removed from the patients without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis. There were 19 ventricular catheters, 15 valves, and 14 abdominal catheters examined. Fourteen of the patients had had three or more shunt revisions. Three of these patients had evidence of some hypersensitivity reaction due to the shunt hardware (multiple eosinophils and giant cells in tissue enveloping shunt hardware). Of the 15 patients who had two or less shunt revisions, none had evidence of hypersensitivity on pathological examination of the shunt hardware. We conclude that pathological examination of shunt hardware is helpful in understanding noninfectious causes of shunt malfunction. We have identified a subgroup of patients who developed a hypersensitivity-like reaction around the shunt that in certain instances may lead to shunt malfunction. It is important to identify these patients for they may be more likely to have multiple episodes of shunt malfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2922665     DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(89)90119-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  13 in total

1.  Clinical peritonitis from allergy to silicone ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Authors:  Michael Kurin; Kenneth Lee; Paul Gardner; Merritt Fajt; Chandraprakash Umapathy; Kenneth Fasanella
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  Case report: the unexpected culprit for multiple shunt revisions.

Authors:  Diana Fitzrol; Badrisyah Idris
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Foreign body or hypersensitivity granuloma of the inner ear after cochlear implantation: one possible cause of a soft failure?

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington; Barbara J Burgess
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Development of Microfabricated Magnetic Actuators for Removing Cellular Occlusion.

Authors:  Selene A Lee; Hyowon Lee; James R Pinney; Elvira Khialeeva; Marvin Bergsneider; Jack W Judy
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.881

5.  Frequency and causes of shunt revisions in different cerebrospinal fluid shunt types.

Authors:  B M Borgbjerg; F Gjerris; M J Albeck; J Hauerberg; S E Børgesen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Protein adsorption to hydrocephalus shunt catheters: CSF protein adsorption.

Authors:  H L Brydon; G Keir; E J Thompson; R Bayston; R Hayward; W Harkness
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  "Extremely minimally invasive": recent advances in nanotechnology research and future applications in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Azeem A Rehman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Foreign Body Response to Silicone in Cochlear Implant Electrodes in the Human.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Donald Galler; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A case of abdominal CSF pseudocyst associated with silicone allergy.

Authors:  Masanori Hashimoto; Akira Yokota; Eiichirou Urasaki; Shuhji Tsujigami; Masayuki Shimono
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Cellular immunologic responses to cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Donald Galler
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.