Literature DB >> 8748853

Frequency and causes of shunt revisions in different cerebrospinal fluid shunt types.

B M Borgbjerg1, F Gjerris, M J Albeck, J Hauerberg, S E Børgesen.   

Abstract

Shunt complications and revisions are common in hydrocephalic patients treated with a ventriculo-atrial or a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. The reported revision rate differs very much but the rate of revision is close to 50% in many papers. Data from 884 hydrocephalic patients treated with various shunt types in the period 1958-1989 were recorded retrospectively in order to evaluate the frequency of revision for various shunt types and secondly to analyse the specific reasons for the shunt revisions. The rate of shunt revision was 45%. The Pudenz shunt was revised more often (62%) than the remaining shunt types. The Hakim and the Orbis-Sigma shunts had fewer revisions (35% and 27%, respectively) than the other observed shunt types. A defect of or an obstruction in the ventricular catheters was a frequent cause of revision followed by a defect or an obstruction of the distal catheter, a displacement of the distal catheter and an acute infection. Because of the higher rate of revision for the Pudenz shunt the rate of the above mentioned specific complications is also higher in most of the subgroups for that specific shunt type. Driven by these experiences it is reasonable to seek to develop and introduce new shunt types in an attempt to reduce the complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8748853     DOI: 10.1007/bf01410625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  26 in total

1.  Follow-up analysis of ventriculoperitoneal and ventriculoatrial shunts for hydrocephalus.

Authors:  R J Ignelzi; W M Kirsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Peritoneal shunts in the treatment of hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure; a 4-year survey of 62 patients.

Authors:  I J JACKSON; S R SNODGRASS
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Complications of ventriculo-vascular shunts: computer analysis of etiological factors.

Authors:  P Steinbok; G B Thompson
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1976-01

4.  Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vain.

Authors:  F E NULSEN; E B SPITZ
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1951

5.  Clinical-pathological analysis of failed central nervous system fluid shunts.

Authors:  N Kossovsky; R B Snow
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1989-04

6.  Cerebrospinal fluid shunting for hydrocephalus: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  J D Metzemaekers; J W Beks; J S van Popta
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Danish experience with the one-piece shunt. A long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J Haase; F Bang; M Tange
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Complications of ventriculo-peritoneal shunting and a critical comparison of the three-piece and one-piece systems.

Authors:  A J Raimondi; J S Robinson; K Kuwawura
Journal:  Childs Brain       Date:  1977

9.  Cerebrospinal fluid shunting for hydrocephalus in the adult: factors related to shunt revision.

Authors:  A Puca; C Anile; G Maira; G Rossi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Hypersensitivity reaction associated with sterile ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction.

Authors:  R B Snow; N Kossovsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1989-03
View more
  14 in total

1.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not benign: a long-term outcome study.

Authors:  Hanne M Yri; Marianne Wegener; Birgit Sander; Rigmor Jensen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Shunt Devices for Neurointensivists: Complications and Management.

Authors:  G Smith; J Pace; A Scoco; G Singh; K Kandregula; S Manjila; C Ramos-Estebanez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Listeria monocytogenes: a rare complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in children.

Authors:  Alban Le Monnier; Stéphane Blanot; Eric Abachin; Jean-Luc Beretti; Patrick Berche; Samer Kayal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Analysis of factors affecting ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Farid Khan; Muhammad Shahzad Shamim; Abdul Rehman; Muhammad Ehsan Bari
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Cryptococcal meningitis in the immunocompromised host: intracranial hypertension and other complications.

Authors:  D A Stevens; D W Denning; S Shatsky; R W Armstrong; J D Adler; B H Lewis
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Visualization of CSF Flow with Time-resolved 3D MR Velocity Mapping in Aqueductal Stenosis Before and After Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy : A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Brandner; Michael Buchfelder; Ilker Y Eyuepoglu; Hannes Luecking; Arnd Doerfler; Andreas Stadlbauer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Risk factors associated with distal catheter migration following ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Ryan Khanna; Zachary D Rasmussen; Oliver Flouty; Nader S Dahdaleh; Jeremy Greenlee; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Nuclear Medicine to Evaluate Complications of Cerebral Shunts: Two Cases and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Beth Vettiyil; Sabrina Bessette; Samuel McQuiston; Francis Greiner
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

9.  Factors affecting ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival in adult patients.

Authors:  Farid Khan; Abdul Rehman; Muhammad S Shamim; Muhammad E Bari
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-02-13

10.  Complete Intestinal Obstruction and Necrosis as a Complication of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Children: A Report of 2 Cases and Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Rui Zhao; Wei Shi; Jianzhong Yu; Xiaofeng Gao; Hao Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.