Literature DB >> 2922640

Spinal stability and intersegmental muscle forces. A biomechanical model.

M Panjabi1, K Abumi, J Duranceau, T Oxland.   

Abstract

The human spinal column, devoid of musculature, is incapable of carrying normal physiologic loads. In an in vitro experiment, the effect of simulated intersegmental muscle forces on spinal instability was investigated. Intact and sequentially injured fresh lumbar functional spinal units were subjected to three-dimensional biomechanical tests with increasing muscle forces. With the application of muscle forces, range of motion (ROM) increased and neutral zone (NZ) decreased in flexion loading, while both ROM and NZ decreased in extension loading. In lateral bending, ROM and NZ were unaffected by the application of the muscle forces. In axial rotation, ROM decreased significantly, while NZ decrease was statistically insignificant. It was concluded that the action of the intersegmental muscle forces is to maintain or decrease intervertebral motions after injury, with the exception of the flexion ROM, which increased with the application of muscle forces. In addition, the study suggested that Neutral Zone is a better indicator of spinal instability than Range of Motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2922640     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198902000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  55 in total

1.  Activation of the human diaphragm during a repetitive postural task.

Authors:  P W Hodges; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Factors contributing to low back pain in rowers.

Authors:  D A Reid; P J McNair
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Why exercise in paraplegia?

Authors:  M Kjaer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Comparison of Intervertebral ROM in Multi-Level Cadaveric Lumbar Spines Using Distinct Pure Moment Loading Approaches.

Authors:  Brandon Santoni; Andres F Cabezas; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; James B Billys; Benjamin Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10-14 years follow up evaluation.

Authors:  El-hadi SariAli; Jean Philippe Lemaire; Hugues Pascal-Mousselard; Hélène Carrier; Waffa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical study of anterior spinal instrumentation configurations.

Authors:  Luc P Cloutier; Carl-Eric Aubin; Guy Grimard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.

Authors:  H J Wilke; S T Krischak; K H Wenger; L E Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Characteristics of stabilizer muscles: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sangwan; Rodney A Green; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.