| Literature DB >> 29225580 |
Roald S Schnerr1, Jacobus F A Jansen1,2, Kamil Uludag3, Paul A M Hofman1,2, Joachim E Wildberger1,2,4, Robert J van Oostenbrugge4,5, Walter H Backes1,2,4.
Abstract
Characterization of flow properties in cerebral arteries with 1.5 and 3 Tesla MRI is usually limited to large cerebral arteries and difficult to evaluate in the small perforating arteries due to insufficient spatial resolution. In this study, we assessed the feasibility to measure blood flow waveforms in the small lenticulostriate arteries with 7 Tesla velocity-sensitive MRI. The middle cerebral artery was included as reference. Imaging was performed in five young and five old healthy volunteers. Flow was calculated by integrating time-varying velocity values over the vascular cross-section. MRI acquisitions were performed twice in each subject to determine reproducibility. From the flow waveforms, the pulsatility index and damping factor were deduced. Reproducibility values, in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficients, were found to be good to excellent. Measured pulsatility index of the lenticulostriate arteries significantly increased and damping factor significantly decreased with age. In conclusion, we demonstrate that blood flow through the lenticostriate arteries can be precisely measured using 7 Tesla MRI and reveal effects of arterial stiffness due to aging. These findings hold promise to provide relevant insights into the pathologies involving perforating cerebral arteries.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral blood flow; cerebrovascular aging; damping factor; flow quantification; lenticostriate artery; middle cerebral artery; pulsatility; pulsatility index
Year: 2017 PMID: 29225580 PMCID: PMC5705621 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1(A) Example maximum-intensity-projection of a time-of-flight volume image showing the geometrical planning of the velocity-sensitized slices of the flow waveform measurement in the LSA (dashed line) and MCA (dotted line). (B) The velocity-sensitized slices showing the magnitude (left: B1,C1) and phase (right: B2,C2) of the MCA (top: B1,B2) and LSA (bottom: C1,C2). The scale is indicated in the bottom left.
Figure 2Example flow waveforms in the MCA (left: A1,B1) and LSA (right: A2,B2) and of a young (upper: A1,A2) and older (bottom: B1,B2) subject. The two subsequent reproducibility measurements are depicted (black squares and gray circles, respectively). The waveform of the MCA was derived from one vessel and, for the LSA, it was averaged over multiple vessels (three in these cases). Note that the MCA waveform of the older subject is lower and less sharp.
Arterial diameters (mm) over the waveform and reproducibility of their mean values.
| MCA | Mean | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 1.3 (38) | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 1.5 (45) | 0.73(0.22–0.92) |
| Min | 2.4 ± 1.4 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | ||||
| Max | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | ||||
| LSA | Mean | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 0.82 (48) | 1.7 ± 1.4 | 1.3 (76) | 0.76(0.29–0.93) |
| Min | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | ||||
| Max | 1.9 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 1.4 | ||||
Arterial diameters did not significantly differ between young and old subjects. Diameter notation: mean ± standard deviation.
CoR, Coefficient of Repeatability; notation, absolute value (percentage of mean value); ICC, Interclass Correlation Coefficient; notation, value (95% confidence interval).
Flow, pulsatility index and damping factor and reproducibility of their mean values.
| MCA | Mean flow | 0.15 (10) | 0.84 (0.47–0.96) | |||
| Min flow | ||||||
| Max flow | ||||||
| LSA | Mean flow | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.02 (18) | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.03 (54) | 0.91 (0.70–0.82) |
| Min flow | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | ||||
| Max flow | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | ||||
| MCA | PI | 1.12 ±0.39 | 0.47 (42) | 0.88 ± 0.22 | 0.31 (35) | 0.68 (0.13–0.91) |
| LSA | PI | 0.17 (37) | 0.24 (35) | 0.74 (0.25–0.93) | ||
| MCA | DF | 0.98 (41) | 0.61 (46) | 0.73 (0.22–0.92) | ||
All MCA waveform flow measures (mean, min, max) were significantly lower for the older subjects compared to the younger subjects (p < 0.04). For the LSA, there was a comparable trend (p < 0.01). The pulsatility index (PI) was significantly higher for the older subjects for the LSA (p = 0.05), but not for the MCA (p = 0.27). The damping factor (DF) was significantly lower for the older subjects (p = 0.017). Statistical tests (p-values) were performed by a Student's t-test.
Flow notation, mean ± standard deviation; statistical significance is indicated by BOLD type setting. CoR, Coefficient of Repeatability, notation, absolute value (percentage of mean value); ICC, Interclass Correlation Coefficient, notation, value (95% confidence interval).
Figure 3Exemplary spatial velocity profiles in a young healthy subject for the MCA (upper: A1,A2) and LSA (lower: B1,B2) for two cardiac phases, when the velocity has its maximum (left: A1, B1) and minimum (right: A2,B2) value. Note the different velocity scales along the vertical axes. The units of the two horizontal axes are in pixels and the depicted surface mesh shows the pixel size of the measurement.
Figure 4Bland-Altman plots showing the difference between the two measurements vs. the mean. Depicted are the mean flow and pulsatility index of the MCA (upper row), mean blood flow and pulsatility index of the LSA (middle row) and damping factor measurements (bottom row) for young (triangles) and old (circles) subjects. The lines indicate the mean and 95% confidence interval of the measurements.