| Literature DB >> 31486211 |
Sau May Wong1,2, Walter H Backes1,2, Gerhard S Drenthen1,2,3, C Eleana Zhang2,4,5, Paulien H M Voorter1,6, Julie Staals2,5, Robert J van Oostenbrugge2,3,4, Jacobus F A Jansen1,2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging assumes two components. However, more compartments are likely present in pathologic tissue. We hypothesized that spectral analysis using a nonnegative least-squares (NNLS) approach can detect an additional, intermediate diffusion component, distinct from the parenchymal and microvascular components, in lesion-prone regions.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; cerebral small vessel disease; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; glymphatic system
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31486211 PMCID: PMC7078988 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging ISSN: 1053-1807 Impact factor: 4.813
Figure 1A T2‐weighted image (a) showing enlarged perivascular spaces (yellow arrows) and a schematic representation of a cross‐section of a capillary with enlarged perivascular space (b). Perivascular spaces are conduits surrounding perforating vessels containing interstitial fluid and its visible enlargements are often observed in the basal ganglia and centrum semiovale.
Figure 2Diffusion spectra in which the diffusion coefficient D with corresponding amplitude a is depicted for a voxel in the normal‐appearing white matter (upper image) and in basal ganglia (lower image). A parenchymal and microvascular perfusion component can be distinguished in both spectra. In the spectra obtained from a voxel in the basal ganglia an intermediate diffusion component can be observed in between the parenchymal and microvascular components.
Intermediate Diffusion Volume Fraction f int and Intermediate Diffusivity D intI
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| BG | 6.0 (4.6) | 2.4 (0.2) |
| CS | 4.3 (1.3) | 2.5 (0.1) |
| WMHs | 27.1 (13.1) | 2.0 (0.2) |
| NAWM | 5.0 (1.4) | 2.4 (0.1) |
| Cortex | 4.3 (1.2) | 2.5 (0.1) |
BG = basal ganglia; CS = centrum semiovale; WMHs = white matter hyperintensities; NAWM = normal appearing white matter.
Occurrence of Spectra in % (SD) With Various Combinations of Components
| Tissue region | Par only | Perf only | Par & Perf | Spectra with Int |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 21.1 (11.6) | 2.0 (2.0) | 53.4 (13.3) | 22.0 (8.0) |
| CS | 6.2 (5.6) | 0.4 (0.7) | 67.3 (8.4) | 26.0 (6.6) |
| WMHs | 7.5 (11.8) | 10.9 (7.1) | 36.2 (19.8) | 42.2 (18.3) |
| NAWM | 12.8 (8.0) | 1.8 (0.8) | 62.2 (6.8) | 22.5 (4.1) |
| Cortex | 11.9 (11.6) | 0.9 (2.0) | 66.0 (6.5) | 20.9 (4.3) |
Par = parenchymal component; Int = Intermediate diffusion component; Perf = perfusion component; BG = basal ganglia; CS = centrum semiovale; WMHs = white matter hyperintensities; NAWM = normal‐appearing white matter.
Occurrence of Spectra in % (SD) in Which an Intermediate Diffusion Component Is Present
| Tissue region | Par, Int & Perf | Par & Int | Int & Perf | Int only |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 45.2 (14.5) | 46.1 (13.7) | 5.0 (6.8) | 3.7 (5.8) |
| CS | 74.2 (14.2) | 25.5 (14.1) | 0.2 (0.9) | 0.1 (0.3) |
| WMHs | 43.3 (19.5) | 26.2 (17.2) | 21.7 (13.9) | 8.9 (8.7) |
| NAWM | 62.5 (11.4) | 32.4 (10.9) | 3.3 (2.0) | 1.7 (1.6) |
| Cortex | 65.6 (11.5) | 29.7 (10.6) | 3.6 (2.4) | 1.1 (1.1) |
Par = parenchymal component; Int = Intermediate diffusion component; Perf = perfusion component; BG = basal ganglia; CS = centrum semiovale; WMHs = white matter hyperintensities; NAWM = normal‐appearing white matter.
Note that in this table only spectra containing an intermediate diffusion component are considered.
Figure 3Boxplots of the intermediate diffusion volume fraction for the groups with low, moderate, and high number of enlarged PVS in the basal ganglia. A larger f int was significantly correlated (r s = 0.49, P < 0.01) with a higher number of enlarged PVS.
Figure 4T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted images, and maps of intermediate diffusion volume fraction in the basal ganglia for a participant (male, 67 years) with low (a‐c, respectively) and a participant (female, 84 years) with high number of enlarged PVS (d–f, respectively). More voxels with higher values of f int can be observed for the participant with a higher number of visible PVS.
Figure 5Relation between the intermediate diffusion volume fraction in the WMHs and relative WMH volume. A significant correlation was observed (r_underscore(s) = 0.57, P < 0.01). Please note that the regression line is only added for visualization.
Figure 6Normalized histograms of the white matter (top) divided into the normal‐appearing white matter (NAWM) (black), centrum semiovale (CS) (gray), and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) (white), and gray matter (bottom) divided into the cortex (black), and basal ganglia (gray). Higher values f int in the WMHs can be observed than in NAWM and CS, which originates from spectra without a parenchymal compartment. Additionally, higher values of f int can be observed in the basal ganglia than in the cortex. Note that we magnified certain regions of the histograms to better visualize bins with lower fractions and hence fractions larger than 10.4% and 3.2% are not shown, for white matter and gray matter, respectively.
Figure 7FLAIR image (a) and superimposed color‐coded map of intermediate diffusion volume fractions (b) of a patient (male, 79 years) with cerebral small vessel disease. High values of intermediate diffusion volume fractions strongly colocalize with white matter hyperintensities. Please note that pericortal regions with elevated intermediate diffusion volume fractions are likely due to partial volume effects. For display purposes, the CSF in the ventricle has been masked out.