PURPOSE: To develop and validate a new prospective respiratory motion compensation algorithm for free-breathing whole-heart 3D cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging. METHODS: In a 3D cine SSFP sequence, 4 excitations per cardiac cycle are re-purposed to prospectively track heart position. Specifically, their 1D image is reconstructed and routed into the scanner's standard diaphragmatic navigator processing system. If all 4 signals are in end-expiration, cine image data from the entire cardiac cycle is accepted for image reconstruction. Prospective validation was carried out in patients (N = 17) by comparing in each a conventional breath-hold 2D cine ventricular short-axis stack and a free-breathing whole-heart 3D cine data set. RESULTS: All 3D cine SSFP acquisitions were successful and the mean scan time was 5.9 ± 2.7 min. Left and right ventricular end-diastolic, end-systolic, and stroke volumes by 3D cine SSFP were all larger than those from 2D cine SSFP. This bias was < 6% except for right ventricular end-systolic volume that was 12%. The 3D cine images had a lower ventricular blood-to-myocardium contrast ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, mass, and subjective quality score. CONCLUSION: The novel prospective respiratory motion compensation method for 3D cine SSFP imaging was robust and efficient and yielded slightly larger ventricular volumes and lower mass compared to breath-hold 2D cine imaging. Magn Reson Med 80:181-189, 2018.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a new prospective respiratory motion compensation algorithm for free-breathing whole-heart 3D cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging. METHODS: In a 3D cine SSFP sequence, 4 excitations per cardiac cycle are re-purposed to prospectively track heart position. Specifically, their 1D image is reconstructed and routed into the scanner's standard diaphragmatic navigator processing system. If all 4 signals are in end-expiration, cine image data from the entire cardiac cycle is accepted for image reconstruction. Prospective validation was carried out in patients (N = 17) by comparing in each a conventional breath-hold 2D cine ventricular short-axis stack and a free-breathing whole-heart 3D cine data set. RESULTS: All 3D cine SSFP acquisitions were successful and the mean scan time was 5.9 ± 2.7 min. Left and right ventricular end-diastolic, end-systolic, and stroke volumes by 3D cine SSFP were all larger than those from 2D cine SSFP. This bias was < 6% except for right ventricular end-systolic volume that was 12%. The 3D cine images had a lower ventricular blood-to-myocardium contrast ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, mass, and subjective quality score. CONCLUSION: The novel prospective respiratory motion compensation method for 3D cine SSFP imaging was robust and efficient and yielded slightly larger ventricular volumes and lower mass compared to breath-hold 2D cine imaging. Magn Reson Med 80:181-189, 2018.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Reza Nezafat; Daniel Herzka; Christian Stehning; Dana C Peters; Kay Nehrke; Warren J Manning Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sean M Hamlet; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Gregory J Wehner; Jonathan D Grabau; Kristin N Andres; Moriel H Vandsburger; David K Powell; Vincent L Sorrell; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Ruixi Zhou; Yang Yang; Roshin C Mathew; John P Mugler; Daniel S Weller; Christopher M Kramer; Abdul Haseeb Ahmed; Mathews Jacob; Michael Salerno Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-04-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tevfik F Ismail; Wendy Strugnell; Chiara Coletti; Maša Božić-Iven; Sebastian Weingärtner; Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Correia; Thomas Küstner Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Kim-Lien Nguyen; Reena M Ghosh; Lindsay M Griffin; Takegawa Yoshida; Arash Bedayat; Cynthia K Rigsby; Mark A Fogel; Kevin K Whitehead; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Abhirup Banerjee; Julià Camps; Ernesto Zacur; Christopher M Andrews; Yoram Rudy; Robin P Choudhury; Blanca Rodriguez; Vicente Grau Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Sebastian Weingärtner; Ömer B Demirel; Francisco Gama; Iain Pierce; Thomas A Treibel; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Mehmet Akçakaya Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-29