Literature DB >> 29222679

[Objective audiometry and clinical application].

M Cebulla1, D Ehrmann-Müller2, W Shehata-Dieler2.   

Abstract

Subjective and objective hearing tests are used for evaluation of hearing impairments. Objective methods include impedance measurement with tympanometry and stapedius reflex measurement, otoacoustic emissions (OAE), and auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Combined with statistical analysis, the introduction of auditory steady state responses (ASSR) has enabled objective hearing tests in newborn hearing screening and automated hearing threshold assessment. The type and degree of hearing loss can be determined using the abovementioned methods. Precise interpretation of the test results is helpful to distinguish an auditory synaptopathy/neuropathy from classical sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory neuropathy; Objective hearing tests; Otoacoustic emission; Tympanometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29222679     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0448-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  18 in total

1.  Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don; Mario Cebulla; Ekkehard Stürzebecher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model.

Authors:  M Scherg; D Von Cramon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

3.  40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Torsten Rahne; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Clinical experience with impedance audiometry.

Authors:  J Jerger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-10

5.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Central auditory development: evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anu Sharma; Phillip Gilley; Kathryn Martin; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Electrocochleography in auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Rosamaria Santarelli; Edoardo Arslan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.

Authors:  Catherine M McMahon; Robert B Patuzzi; William P R Gibson; Halit Sanli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  [Clinical and audiological findings in children with auditory neuropathy].

Authors:  W Shehata-Dieler; C Völter; A Hildmann; H Hildmann; J Helms
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.057

10.  Narrow band CE-Chirp auditory steady-state response is more reliable than the conventional ASSR in predicting the behavioral hearing threshold.

Authors:  Min Young Lee; Se Young Ahn; Hyun Ju Lee; Jae Yun Jung; Chung-Ku Rhee; Myung-Whan Suh
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 1.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.