Literature DB >> 29220787

Assessment tools for microplastics and natural fibres ingested by fish in an urbanised estuary.

Jennifer E Halstead1, James A Smith2, Elizabeth A Carter3, Peter A Lay3, Emma L Johnston2.   

Abstract

Microplastics and fibres occur in high concentrations along urban coastlines, but the occurrence of microplastic ingestion by fishes in these areas requires further investigation. Herein, the ingestion of debris (i.e., synthetic and natural fibres and synthetic fragments of various polymer types) by three benthic-foraging fish species Acanthopagrus australis (yellowfin bream), Mugil cephalus (sea mullet) and Gerres subfasciatus (silverbiddy) in Sydney Harbour, Australia has been quantified and chemically speciated by vibrational spectroscopy to identify the polymer type. Ingested debris were quantified using gut content analysis, and identified using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) and Raman microspectroscopies in combination with principal component analysis (PCA). The occurrence of debris ingestion at the time of sampling ranged from 21 to 64% for the three species, and the debris number ranged from 0.2 to 4.6 items per fish for the different species, with ∼53% of debris being microplastic. There was a significant difference in the amount of debris ingested among species; however, there was no difference among species when debris counts were standardised to fish weight or gut content weight, indicating that these species ingest a similar concentration of debris relative to their ingestion rate of other material. ATR-FTIR microspectroscopy successfully identified 72% of debris. Raman spectroscopy contributed an additional 1% of successful identification. In addition, PCA was used to non-subjectively classify the ATR-FTIR spectra resulting in the identification of an additional 9% of the debris. The most common microplastics found were polyester (PET), acrylic-polyester blend, and rayon (semi-synthetic) fibres. The potential of using Raman microspectroscopy for debris identification was investigated and provided additional information about the nature of the debris as well as the presence of specific dyes (and hence potential toxicity).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acanthopagrus australis; Gerres subfasciatus; Ingestion; Microplastic; Mugil cephalus; Sea mullet; Silverbiddy; Vibrational spectroscopy; Yellowfin bream

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29220787     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  12 in total

Review 1.  Occurrence, sources, human health impacts and mitigation of microplastic pollution.

Authors:  Samaneh Karbalaei; Parichehr Hanachi; Tony R Walker; Matthew Cole
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Microplastics in environment: global concern, challenges, and controlling measures.

Authors:  G Lamichhane; A Acharya; R Marahatha; B Modi; R Paudel; A Adhikari; B K Raut; S Aryal; N Parajuli
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Classification of marine microdebris: A review and case study on fish from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

Authors:  Frederieke J Kroon; Cherie E Motti; Lene H Jensen; Kathryn L E Berry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Detection and removal of microplastics in wastewater: evolution and impact.

Authors:  Thuhin K Dey; Md Elias Uddin; Mamun Jamal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  From plastics to microplastics and organisms.

Authors:  Oliver Bajt
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.693

6.  Occurrence of potential plastic microfibers in mussels and anchovies sold for human consumption: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Serena Santonicola; Michela Volgare; Emilia Di Pace; Mariacristina Cocca; Raffaelina Mercogliano; Giampaolo Colavita
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2021-12-22

7.  Microplastics in fecal samples of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) and from surface water in the Philippines.

Authors:  Mila Mi Hua Yong; Clara Leistenschneider; Joni Anne Miranda; Maria Kristina Paler; Christine Legaspi; Elitza Germanov; Gonzalo Araujo; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm; Gabriel Erni-Cassola
Journal:  Microplast nanoplast       Date:  2021-09-26

Review 8.  Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes' laundering?

Authors:  Christine Gaylarde; Jose Antonio Baptista-Neto; Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Chronic microfiber exposure in adult Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).

Authors:  Lingling Hu; Melissa Chernick; Anna M Lewis; P Lee Ferguson; David E Hinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Particle Characterization of Washing Process Effluents by Laser Diffraction Technique.

Authors:  Mirjana Čurlin; Tanja Pušić; Branka Vojnović; Nino Dimitrov
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.