| Literature DB >> 29220389 |
Haoran Guo1,2, Enmin Ding2, Ying Bai2, Hengdong Zhang2, Huanxi Shen3, Jun Wang1, Xianping Song4, Wenyan Cai4, Jiadi Guo4, Baoli Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL), a multifactorial disease involving both genetic and environmental factors, is one of the most important occupational health hazards. Nonetheless, the influence of FOXO3 variants on NIHL risk have not been illuminated. This research was conducted to explore the effects of FOXO3 polymorphisms on individual susceptibility to NIHL. A total of 2689 industrial workers from one textile factory of east China were recruited to participate in the current research. Venous blood was collected, questionnaire and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) was conducted by specialist physicians. Then, we performed genotyping of three selected SNPs (rs2802292, rs10457180, and rs12206094) in FOXO3 gene in 566 NIHL patients and 566 controls. Subsequently, the main effects of genotype and its interactions were evaluated. Our results revealed that individuals with the G allele of rs2802292, G allele of rs10457180, T allele of rs12206094 (OR = 1.43, 1.43, and 1.31 respectively) and the haplotype GAC and others (TGT/GGT/GGC/GAT) (rs2802292-rs10457180-rs12206094) (OR = 1.49 and 2.09 respectively) are associated with an increased risk of NIHL in a Chinese population. Stratified analysis showed that an increased NIHL risk was found in the subjects who exposed to noise >16 years with rs2802292 GG/GT and rs10457180 AG/GG genotype with an OR of 1.62 and 1.66 respectively. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis indicated that rs10457180, rs2802292, and rs12206094 have interactions and are related to increased NIHL risk (OR = 1.53). The genetic polymorphism rs2802292, rs10457180, and rs12206094 within FOXO3 gene are associated with an increased risk of NIHL in a Chinese population and have potential to be biomarkers for noise exposed workers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29220389 PMCID: PMC5722378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics of study subjects.
| Variables | Cases (n = 566) | Controls (n = 566) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Age (years) | 0.879 | ||||
| Mean±SD | 40.52±6.26 | 40.31±5.85 | 0.556 | ||
| ≤ 35 | 133 | 23.5 | 138 | 24.4 | |
| 35–45 | 320 | 56.5 | 321 | 56.7 | |
| > 45 | 113 | 20.0 | 107 | 18.9 | |
| Sex | 0.646 | ||||
| Male | 527 | 93.1 | 523 | 92.4 | |
| Female | 39 | 6.9 | 43 | 7.6 | |
| Smoking | 0.263 | ||||
| Now | 331 | 58.5 | 315 | 55.7 | |
| Ever | 11 | 1.9 | 19 | 3.4 | |
| Never | 224 | 39.6 | 232 | 41.0 | |
| Drinking | 0.898 | ||||
| Now | 233 | 41.2 | 235 | 41.5 | |
| Ever | 10 | 1.8 | 12 | 2.1 | |
| Never | 323 | 57.1 | 319 | 56.4 | |
| Work time with noise (years) | 0.237 | ||||
| Mean±SD | 18.69±7.59 | 18.06±7.03 | 0.145 | ||
| ≤ 16 | 248 | 43.8 | 261 | 46.1 | |
| > 16 | 318 | 56.2 | 305 | 53.9 | |
| Expose level with noise (dB) | 0.712 | ||||
| Mean±SD | 87.18±7.72 | 87.39±7.39 | 0.651 | ||
| ≤ 85 | 253 | 44.7 | 249 | 44.0 | |
| 85–92 | 109 | 19.3 | 101 | 17.8 | |
| > 92 | 204 | 36.0 | 216 | 38.2 | |
| High frequency hearing threshold shift (dB) | |||||
| Mean±SD | 35.77±9.86 | 14.02±4.17 | |||
| ≤ 26 | 59 | 10.4 | 566 | 100.0 | |
| > 26 | 507 | 89.6 | 0 | 0.0 | |
a Two-sided χ2 test
b Students’ t-test.
General information of selected SNPs and Hardy-Weinberg test.
| SNP | Alleles | Chromosome | Functional Consequence | MAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Database | |||||
| rs2802292 | 6:108587315 | 5’ UTR variant | 0.212 | 0.189 | 0.172 | |
| rs10457180 | 6:108643836 | Intron variant | 0.205 | 0.200 | 0.754 | |
| rs12206094 | 6:108584997 | Intron variant (upstream variant 2KB) | 0.143 | 0.146 | 0.858 | |
a Data from NCBI dbSNP
b P value of Hardy-Weinberg test.
Distribution of three polymorphisms and the association with NIHL.
| Genetic models | Genotypes | Cases | Controls | Adjusted OR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 566 | % | n = 566 | % | (95% CI) | |||
| rs2802292 | |||||||
| Codominant | 307 | 54.2 | 352 | 62.2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 204 | 36.0 | 188 | 33.2 | 1.26 (0.98–1.02) | |||
| GG | 55 | 9.7 | 26 | 4.6 | |||
| Dominant | 307 | 54.2 | 352 | 62.2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 259 | 45.8 | 214 | 37.8 | ||||
| Recessive | 511 | 90.3 | 540 | 95.4 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 55 | 9.7 | 26 | 4.6 | ||||
| Alleles | 818 | 72.3 | 892 | 78.8 | < | 1.00 (Ref.) | |
| 314 | 27.7 | 240 | 21.2 | ||||
| rs10457180 | |||||||
| Codominant | 309 | 54.6 | 357 | 63.1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 210 | 37.1 | 186 | 32.9 | ||||
| 47 | 8.3 | 23 | 4.1 | ||||
| Dominant | 309 | 54.6 | 357 | 63.1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 257 | 45.4 | 209 | 36.9 | ||||
| Recessive | 519 | 91.7 | 543 | 95.9 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 47 | 8.3 | 23 | 4.1 | ||||
| Alleles | 828 | 73.1 | 900 | 79.5 | < | 1.00 (Ref.) | |
| 304 | 26.9 | 232 | 20.5 | ||||
| rs12206094 | |||||||
| Codominant | 389 | 68.7 | 416 | 73.5 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 152 | 26.9 | 138 | 24.4 | 1.19 (0.91–1.56) | |||
| 25 | 4.4 | 12 | 2.1 | ||||
| Dominant | 389 | 68.7 | 416 | 73.5 | 0.088 | 1.00 (Ref.) | |
| 177 | 31.3 | 150 | 26.5 | 1.28 (0.99–1.65) | |||
| Recessive | 541 | 95.6 | 554 | 97.9 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 25 | 4.4 | 12 | 2.1 | ||||
| Alleles | 930 | 82.2 | 970 | 85.7 | 1.00 (Ref.) | ||
| 202 | 17.8 | 162 | 14.3 | ||||
a Two-sided χ2 test
b Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking in logistic regression model.
Stratified analysis of SNPs in a dominant model.
| SNPs | Group | Genotype | Work time with noise (years) | Expose level with noise (dB) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤16 | > 16 | ≤85 | 85–92 | > 92 | |||
| rs2802292 | case | 113 | 146 | 112 | 52 | 95 | |
| 135 | 172 | 141 | 57 | 109 | |||
| control | 107 | 107 | 89 | 33 | 92 | ||
| 154 | 198 | 160 | 68 | 124 | |||
| 0.298 | 0.051 | 0.027 | 0.413 | ||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1.22 (0.85–1.74) | 1.50 (1.04–2.16) | 1.77 (1.00–3.13) | 1.18 (0.80–1.75) | |||
| rs10457180 | case | 115 | 142 | 117 | 49 | 91 | |
| 133 | 176 | 136 | 60 | 113 | |||
| control | 107 | 102 | 83 | 32 | 94 | ||
| 154 | 203 | 166 | 69 | 122 | |||
| 0.222 | 0.048 | 0.822 | |||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1.27 (0.89–1.81) | 1.73 (0.97–3.09) | 1.06 (0.72–1.57) | ||||
| rs12206094 | case | 80 | 97 | 77 | 33 | 67 | |
| 168 | 221 | 176 | 76 | 137 | |||
| control | 78 | 72 | 62 | 18 | 70 | ||
| 183 | 233 | 187 | 83 | 146 | |||
| 0.563 | 0.053 | 0.166 | 0.035 | 0.924 | |||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1.14 (0.78–1.66) | 1.47 (1.02–2.10) | 1.39 (0.93–2.07) | 1.87 | 1.02 (0.67–1.54) | ||
a Two-sided χ2 test.
b Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking in logistic regression model.
Frequencies of inferred haplotypes among the cases and controls and their association with risk NIHL.
| Haplotypes | Case (n = 566) | Control (n = 566) | Adjusted OR | Global | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | (95% CI) | |||
| 610 | 53.9 | 697 | 61.6 | 1.00 (Ref.) | |||
| 209 | 18.5 | 190 | 16.8 | ||||
| 130 | 11.5 | 118 | 10.4 | 0.080 | 1.28 (0.97–1.68) | ||
| 72 | 6.4 | 66 | 5.8 | 0.209 | 1.25 (0.88–1.78) | ||
| Others | 111 | 9.8 | 61 | 5.4 | |||
a The alleles of haplotypes were arrayed as rs2802292-rs10457180-rs12206094.
b Two-sided χ2 test.
c Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking in logistic regression model.
d Generated by permutation test with 1000 times of simulation.
e Haplotypes (TGT/GGT/GGC/GAT) were pooled into the mixed group.
MDR analysis results of the interaction between the three SNPs.
| Model | Training balanced accuracy | Testing balanced accuracy | Cross-validation consistency | OR(95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs10457180 | 0.5426 | 0.538 | 9/10 | 0.0037 | 1.42(1.12–1.80) |
| rs10457181-rs2802292 | 0.5463 | 0.5274 | 7/10 | 0.0016 | 1.47(1.16–1.87) |
| rs10457181-rs2802292-rs12206094 | 0.5507 | 0.538 | 10/10 | 0.0005 | 1.53(1.20–1.94) |