| Literature DB >> 31886164 |
Suhao Zhang1, Enmin Ding2, Haoyang Yin3, Hengdong Zhang2, Baoli Zhu1,2,3.
Abstract
Long-term and continuous noise exposure can result in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), which is a worldwide problem resulting from the interaction of environmental and genetic factors. The ATP2B2 gene polymorphism can destroy cochlear hair cells and increase the risk of NIHL. A case-control study of 760 Chinese textile workers was conducted to investigate the relationship between ATP2B2 polymorphisms and NIHL susceptibility. Venous blood was collected and questionnaires were conducted by professional physicians. A case group and a control group which were typed by individuals' pure-tone audiometry test results were set. Three polymorphism sites of ATP2B2 were genotyped by using the PCR technique. Analysis results revealed that the C allele of rs3209637 (95%CI = 1.08-2.58, odds ratio (OR) = 1.67, P = 0.027) was a dangerous factor and could add to risks of NIHL in the Chinese employees. The data of stratified analysis revealed that individuals who are exposed to noise > 95 dB with the rs3209637 C genotype have a higher susceptibility to NIHL (OR = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.07-1.68). Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis revealed that the interaction between rs14154 and rs3209637 is linked to increased NIHL risk, and for the interaction among rs14154, smoking and drinking had the same function (OR = 1.54 and 1.77, 95%CI = 1.15-2.07, 1.33-2.37, and P = 0.0037 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Our results suggest that genetic polymorphism rs3209637 C within ATP2B2 is a risk factor for NIHL among Chinese employees and rs3209637 C could be a potential biomarker for NIHL patients.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31886164 PMCID: PMC6914915 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5048943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Genomics ISSN: 2314-436X Impact factor: 2.326
Demographic characteristics of study subjects.
| Variables | Case group ( | Control group ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Age (years) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 39.82 ± 6.59 | 40.09 ± 6.32 | 0.567a | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 358 | 94.2 | 355 | 93.4 | 0.652b |
| Female | 22 | 5.8 | 25 | 6.6 | |
| Tobacco use | |||||
| Now | 223 | 58.7 | 210 | 55.3 | 0.501b |
| Ever | 9 | 2.4 | 13 | 3.4 | |
| Never | 148 | 38.9 | 157 | 41.3 | |
| Alcohol consumption | |||||
| Now | 169 | 44.5 | 173 | 45.5 | 0.836b |
| Ever | 8 | 2.1 | 10 | 2.6 | |
| Never | 203 | 53.4 | 197 | 51.8 | |
| Work time with noise (years) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 17.35 ± 7.60 | 16.94 ± 7.16 | 0.452a | ||
| Expose level with noise (dB) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 89.52 ± 7.26 | 90.09 ± 6.98 | 0.269a | ||
| High-frequency hearing threshold (dB) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 36.74 ± 10.23 | 13.66 ± 4.20 |
| ||
| ≤25 | 0 | 0.0 | 380 | 100.0 | |
| >25 | 380 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
aStudents' t-test. bTwo-sided χ2 test. cFisher's exact test.
General information of selected SNPs and Hardy-Weinberg test.
| SNP | Alleles | Chromosome | Functional consequence | MAF |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Databasea | |||||
| rs1719571 | A/G | 3:10327496 | 3′UTR | 0.357 | 0.360 | 0.903 |
| rs14154 | C/G | 3:10326429 | 3′UTR | 0.378 | 0.383 | 0.751 |
| rs3209637 | C/T | 3:10327264 | 3′UTR | 0.463 | 0.465 | 0.959 |
aData from NCBI dbSNP. bP value of Hardy-Weinberg test.
Distribution of three polymorphisms and the association with NIHL.
| Genetic models | Genotypes | Case group | Control group |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI)b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||||
| rs1719571 | |||||||
| Codominant | AA | 141 | 37.1 | 161 | 42.4 | 0.332 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| AG | 183 | 48.2 | 167 | 43.9 | 1.25 (0.92-1.70) | ||
| GG | 56 | 14.7 | 52 | 13.7 | 1.26 (0.81-1.96) | ||
| Dominant | AA | 141 | 37.1 | 161 | 42.4 | 0.138 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| GG+AG | 239 | 62.9 | 219 | 57.6 | 1.25 (0.93-1.67) | ||
| Recessive | AG+AA | 324 | 85.3 | 328 | 86.3 | 0.678 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| GG | 56 | 14.7 | 52 | 13.7 | 1.11 (0.74-1.68) | ||
| Alleles | A | 465 | 61.2 | 489 | 64.3 | 0.203 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| G | 295 | 38.8 | 271 | 35.7 | 1.15 (0.94-1.42) | ||
|
| |||||||
| rs14154 | |||||||
| Codominant | CC | 119 | 31.3 | 144 | 37.9 | 0.129 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| CG | 211 | 55.5 | 185 | 48.7 |
| ||
| GG | 50 | 13.2 | 51 | 13.4 | 1.21 (0.76-1.92) | ||
| Dominant | CC | 119 | 31.3 | 144 | 37.9 | 0.057 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| CG+GG | 261 | 68.7 | 236 | 62.1 |
| ||
| Recessive | CG+CC | 330 | 86.8 | 329 | 86.6 | 0.915 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| GG | 50 | 13.2 | 51 | 13.4 | 0.99 (0.65-1.51) | ||
| Alleles | C | 449 | 59.1 | 473 | 62.2 | 0.208 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| G | 311 | 40.9 | 287 | 37.8 | 1.15 (0.94-1.42) | ||
|
| |||||||
| rs3209637 | |||||||
| Codominant | TT | 83 | 21.8 | 92 | 24.2 |
| 1.00 (ref.) |
| CT | 203 | 53.4 | 224 | 58.9 | 1.01 (0.71-1.44) | ||
| CC | 94 | 24.7 | 64 | 16.8 |
| ||
| Dominant | TT | 83 | 21.8 | 92 | 24.2 | 0.438 | 1.00 (ref.) |
| CC+CT | 297 | 78.2 | 288 | 75.8 | 1.15 (0.82-1.62) | ||
| Recessive | CT+TT | 286 | 75.3 | 316 | 83.2 |
| 1.00 (ref.) |
| CC | 94 | 24.7 | 64 | 16.8 |
| ||
| Alleles | T | 369 | 48.6 | 408 | 53.7 |
| 1.00 (ref.) |
| C | 391 | 51.4 | 352 | 46.3 |
| ||
aTwo-sided χ2 test. bAdjusted for age, sex, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption in the logistic regression model.
Stratified analysis of SNPs in the allelic model.
| SNPs | Group | Alleles | Cumulative noise exposure (dBA) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤95 | >95 | |||
| rs1719571 | Case group | G | 67 | 228 |
| A | 109 | 356 | ||
| Control group | G | 43 | 228 | |
| A | 91 | 398 | ||
|
| 0.276 | 0.373 | ||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI)b | 1.32 (0.82-2.13) | 1.12 (0.89-1.42) | ||
|
| ||||
| rs14154 | Case group | G | 70 | 241 |
| C | 106 | 343 | ||
| Control group | G | 47 | 240 | |
| C | 87 | 386 | ||
|
| 0.398 | 0.298 | ||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI)b | 1.24 (0.77-1.98) | 1.14 (0.91-1.44) | ||
|
| ||||
| rs3209637 | Case group | C | 88 | 303 |
| T | 88 | 281 | ||
| Control group | C | 71 | 281 | |
| T | 63 | 345 | ||
|
| 0.602 |
| ||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI)b | 0.90 (0.57-1.42) |
| ||
aTwo-sided χ2 test. bAdjusted for age, sex, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption in logistic regression model.
Analysis of the interaction of the 3 selected SNPs by MDR.
| Best model | Training balanced accuracy | Testing balanced accuracy | Cross-validation consistency |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs3209637 | 0.5408 | 0.5105 | 7/10 |
|
|
| rs14154∗rs3209637 | 0.5541 | 0.5158 | 6/10 |
|
|
| rs14154∗smoke∗drink | 0.5756 | 0.4711 | 5/10 |
|
|
Figure 1Best-fit model gained by the analysis of MDR. The implications of the bars and background color in each multifactor cell are as follows. The left bars represent the sum of scores in the case and the right represents the control. High risk cells are expressed by the black shadow if the ratio of the number of cases to the number of controls exceeds the preset value T, as low risk cells by light shadow if not more than the threshold, and empty cells with no shadow which means no cases and controls. The multifactor cells labeled as “high risk” or “low risk” are then used to assess the classification and predication accuracy, thus identifying the best model in the subsequent steps (drink 1: now; drink 2: ever; drink 3: never; smoke 1: now; smoke 2: ever; smoke 3: never).