BACKGROUND: Definitive guidelines for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) do not exist. This study has focused on the repeat surgery when analyzing the survival outcomes of recurrent ICC. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological features of the primary tumor and implementation of the repeat surgery to identify its potential selection criteria. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with recurrent ICC between 1993 and 2015 were analyzed. Of these, 15 patients underwent repeat surgery and 93 did not. RESULTS: Seven out of 29 patients with intrahepatic recurrence and eight out of 44 patients with extrahepatic recurrence were amenable to the repeat surgery. Thirty-five patients with simultaneous or consequent intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence were not amenable to the repeat surgery. Patients who underwent repeat surgery had a lower proportion of lymph node metastases (n = 0 [0%] vs. n = 47 [50.5%], p < 0.001), multiple tumors in the primary tumor (n = 1 [6.7%] vs. n = 31 [33.3%], p = 0.037), or early recurrence (≤ 1 year; n = 4 [26.7%] vs. n = 62 [66.7%], p = 0.003). Survival after recurrence (SAR) was better in patients who underwent repeat surgery than in those who did not (median SAR time: 91.6 vs. 10.4 months, and 3-year survival: 86.7 vs. 8.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat surgery for recurrent ICC with an appropriate selection can be associated with prolonged survival. Regarding the feasibility, nodal status, number of tumors on the primary tumor, and time to recurrence may be considered as selection criteria.
BACKGROUND: Definitive guidelines for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) do not exist. This study has focused on the repeat surgery when analyzing the survival outcomes of recurrent ICC. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological features of the primary tumor and implementation of the repeat surgery to identify its potential selection criteria. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with recurrent ICC between 1993 and 2015 were analyzed. Of these, 15 patients underwent repeat surgery and 93 did not. RESULTS: Seven out of 29 patients with intrahepatic recurrence and eight out of 44 patients with extrahepatic recurrence were amenable to the repeat surgery. Thirty-five patients with simultaneous or consequent intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence were not amenable to the repeat surgery. Patients who underwent repeat surgery had a lower proportion of lymph node metastases (n = 0 [0%] vs. n = 47 [50.5%], p < 0.001), multiple tumors in the primary tumor (n = 1 [6.7%] vs. n = 31 [33.3%], p = 0.037), or early recurrence (≤ 1 year; n = 4 [26.7%] vs. n = 62 [66.7%], p = 0.003). Survival after recurrence (SAR) was better in patients who underwent repeat surgery than in those who did not (median SAR time: 91.6 vs. 10.4 months, and 3-year survival: 86.7 vs. 8.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat surgery for recurrent ICC with an appropriate selection can be associated with prolonged survival. Regarding the feasibility, nodal status, number of tumors on the primary tumor, and time to recurrence may be considered as selection criteria.
Authors: Giorgio Ercolani; Gaetano Vetrone; Gian Luca Grazi; Osamu Aramaki; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Ravaioli; Carla Serra; Giovanni Brandi; Antonio Daniele Pinna Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carsten Kamphues; D Seehofer; R M Eisele; T Denecke; J Pratschke; U P Neumann; P Neuhaus Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 7.027
Authors: Omar Hyder; Ioannis Hatzaras; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Andreas Paul; Sorin Alexandrescu; Hugo Marques; Carlo Pulitano; Eduardo Barroso; Bryan M Clary; Luca Aldrighetti; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew X Zhu; Todd W Bauer; Dustin M Walters; Ryan Groeschl; T Clark Gamblin; J Wallis Marsh; Kevin T Nguyen; Ryan Turley; Irinel Popescu; Catherine Hubert; Stephanie Meyer; Michael A Choti; Jean-Francois Gigot; Gilles Mentha; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: S Roayaie; J V Guarrera; M Q Ye; S N Thung; S Emre; T M Fishbein; S R Guy; P A Sheiner; C M Miller; M E Schwartz Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: T Okusaka; K Nakachi; A Fukutomi; N Mizuno; S Ohkawa; A Funakoshi; M Nagino; S Kondo; S Nagaoka; J Funai; M Koshiji; Y Nambu; J Furuse; M Miyazaki; Y Nimura Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Daniel R Waisberg; Rafael S Pinheiro; Lucas S Nacif; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Rodrigo B Martino; Rubens M Arantes; Liliana Ducatti; Quirino Lai; Wellington Andraus; Luiz C D'Albuquerque Journal: Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-09-12
Authors: Tommaso M Manzia; Alessandro Parente; Ilaria Lenci; Bruno Sensi; Martina Milana; Carlo Gazia; Alessandro Signorello; Roberta Angelico; Giuseppe Grassi; Giuseppe Tisone; Leonardo Baiocchi Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-12-15