| Literature DB >> 29213957 |
Caroline de Oliveira Cardoso1, Nicolle Zimmermann1, Camila Borges Paraná2, Gigiane Gindri1, Ana Paula Almeida de Pereira2, Rochele Paz Fonseca1.
Abstract
Over recent years, neuropsychological research has been increasingly concerned with the need to develop more ecologically valid instruments for the assessment of executive functions. The Hotel Task is one of the most widely used ecological measures of executive functioning, and provides an assessment of planning, organization, self-monitoring and cognitive flexibility.Entities:
Keywords: Hotel Task; adaptation; executive functions; neuropsychology
Year: 2015 PMID: 29213957 PMCID: PMC5619354 DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642015DN92000010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dement Neuropsychol ISSN: 1980-5764
Sample characteristics by adaptation phase of the Hotel Task.
| Phase | Phase | Participants | Descriptive | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Direct translation | 02 translators | Bilingual neuropsychologists with background in
EF | |
| Compared translation | 01 expert translator for consensus | Neuropsychologist and speech therapist | ||
| 2 | Author brainstorm - phase 1 | 06 - Discussion of semantic adjustments to instructions and task stimuli | 05 Neuropsychologists and 01 speech therapist
proficient in neuropsychology and | VERSION 1 |
| 3 | Expert judge analysis - phase 1 | 04 expert judges - Evaluation of instructions and task stimuli adequacy | 03 Neuropsychologists and | |
| 4 | Author brainstorm - phase 2 | 06 - Discussion of adjustments to instructions and task stimuli after suggestions by expert judges | 05 Neuropsychologists and | VERSION 2 |
| 5 | Pilot study 1 | 01 healthy adult | Age (years): 20 | |
| 6 | Author brainstorm - phase 3 | 06 - Discussion of adjustments to instructions, task stimuli and scoring after observations in Pilot study 1 | 05 Neuropsychologists and | VERSION 3 |
| 7 | Expert judge analysis - phase 2 | 02 expert judges | 02 Neuropsychologists | |
| Pilot study 2 | 05 healthy adults | Age in years, mean: 25.02 | ||
| 8 | Author brainstorm - phase 4 | 06 - Discussion of adjustments to instructions, task stimuli and scoring | 05 Neuropsychologists and | VERSION 4 |
| 9 | Pilot study 3 | 01 healthy adult | Age in years: 54 | |
| 10 | Author brainstorm - phase 5 | 06 - Discussion of adjustments to instructions, task stimuli and scoring | 05 Neuropsychologists and | VERSION 5 |
| 11 | Appraisal of expert judge analysis | 01 Professional expert | 01 Expert in business administration with emphasis in hotel management and 11 years of experience as hotel manager | |
| 12 | Pilot study 4 | 10 TBI | Age in years, mean (SD |
Executive function;
Traumatic brain injury;
Standard deviation.
Phases for Hotel Task adaptation.
| Phases | Specification |
|---|---|
| 1 - Translation | Instructions and stimuli were translated and adapted to the Brazilian social and cultural context. The overall procedure was divided into two sub-steps: a) direct translation by two English-proficient translators; and b) translation comparison by an expert in the assessed constructs and knowledge in the languages involved. |
| 2 - Development of new stimuli and author brainstorm - phase 1 | Authors developed stimuli and performed semantic adjustments to instructions from the original version (Manly et al., 2002) and the study of the applicability of the Hotel Task by Torralva et al. (2012). The first version of the Hotel Task was developed (Version 1). |
| 3 - Expert judge analysis - phase 1 | Professionals analyzed the adapted stimuli from the previous step and instructions for each task. At first, each judge was required to individually verify whether each stimulus was appropriate for the respective instruction, suggesting changes where necessary. |
| 4 - Development of new stimuli and author brainstorm - phase 2 | Based on expert analysis and suggestions, the authors modified several stimuli and a new version was developed (Version 2). |
| 5 - Pilot study | The first pilot study was conducted with the second version of the task in order to test the instrument in a real assessment situation, as well as to analyze potential faults and stimuli adequacy. A healthy young adult participated. |
| 6 and 7 - Development of new stimuli and author brainstorm - phase 3; and Expert judge analysis - phase 2 and Pilot study 2 | The authors made further adjustments after observations from the first pilot study (Version 3). Furthermore, a second expert judge analysis was concurrently conducted via a pilot study with Version 3 and five healthy adults. |
| 8 and 9 - Development of new stimuli and author brainstorm - phase 4; and Pilot study 3 | The authors made further adjustments after suggestions by the expert judges and observations from the pilot study (Version 4). The fourth version of the instrument was utilized with a healthy adult in phase 9. |
| 10 and 11 - Development of new stimuli and author brainstorm - phase 5; and assessment by expert judge analysis | Further adjustments were made after observations and analysis of the third pilot study (Version 5). A professional in business administration with emphasis in hotel management analyzed the proposed activities. Each task was explained and the judge evaluated whether instructions and stimuli were consistent with the reality of Brazilian hotels. |
| 12 - Pilot study 4 | The fifth version was utilized with 10 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This population was selected for having a high prevalence of executive dysfunction. |
Versions of the Hotel Task through adaptation phases.
| Version | Compiling individual bills task | Sorting the charity collection task | Looking for promotions in menu task | Sorting conference labels task | Proof reading the hotel brochure | Waking up guests | Instructions | Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERSION 1 | Development of two billing lists: one with the costs of services provided to all guests and another for individual guest billing | Selection of 50 coins of Brazilian currency and 50 coins of foreign currency | Development of a list of local companies selected from a public telephone list. The participant was required to search the public list for companies’ telephone numbers | Development of 100 name tags with the name and surname from participants of a meeting | A hotel folder was developed. It comprised 509 words, 17 orthographic errors, font size 12, in color | A box was used as the garage remote control | A general instruction and further instructions for each task | Variables: Number of tasks started; task time; Number of times garage button was pressed; Time deviations in opening and closing garage doors; Correct responses versus number of tries on each task |
| VERSION 2 | An example was added to task instructions | No modification | Task was maintained, however each Brazilian state were required to create its own list of companies | No modification | No modification | No modification | Instructions were all modified; in the adapted version, instructions were only read aloud to the patient, with no written version available for further consultation | Qualitative analyses were included |
| VERSION 3 | No modification | Number of coins was modified to 45
each. | No modification | No modification | No modification | No modification | No modification | No modification |
| VERSION 4 | We increased | Number of coins was altered to 100 Brazilian coins and 10% target coins (foreign coins) | We modified task stimuli. A restaurant menu with promotional meals was developed. Task objective was to find the promotional meals | We opted to insert the first name followed by the surname. Number of tags was reduced to 80 and font size was increased. | Font size was increased and writing was printed in black font. The amount of errors corresponded to around 10% the number of words (539 words and 62 errors) | Instead of using a box as remote control, participants were required to press two telephone buttons in order to wake up guests. | Participants also received a written version to follow during reading of instructions. For each task, an instruction chart was available | No modification |
| VERSION 5 | Same version was maintained, with an increase in font size to 16 | Number of coins was increased to 198 Brazilian and 22 foreign coins. Number of coins by value and nationality was stimulated | The Promotional meals task was officially established | Version 4 was maintained | Version 4 was maintained | The idea of waking up guests was maintained | No modification | No modification |
Description of the original Hotel Task and of the final Brazilian adapted version.
| Version by Manly et al. (2002) | Adapted version |
|---|---|
| Compiling individual bills. Two types of material are presented: The first represents the till roll from the hotel register listing services provided to the guests and their costs. The second are individual bill forms for each of the guests. The till roll needed to be scanned for services used by a particular guest and then these items transferred to individual bills. Eight guest bills each featuring 10 separate items would need to be compiled. | Compiling customer bills. The task was identical to the original version, except for the inclusion of an example before starting the task. |
| Sorting the charity collection. One box containing 196 coins, of which 21 are of foreign origin. The goal in this task is to sort the British from the foreign coins. The British coins comprised: 5×1p, 4×2p, 96×5p, 46×l0p and 24×20p. | Sorting the charity collection task. A total of 198 Brazilian coins and 22 of foreign currency. The goal is to sort foreign coins from Brazilian coins. Brazilian coins available are: 7x1.00, 16x0.50, 45x0.25, 65x0.10 and 65x0.05. |
| Looking up telephone numbers. Participants are provided with a list of 34 local companies and asked to find and note down their telephone numbers using the regional Yellow Pages phone directory. | Looking for promotions in menu task. A list of 20 monthly promotions is provided and the participant is asked to search for matching prices in the menu. |
| Sorting conference labels. Participants are provided with a pile of 100 labels, each with the name of a guest attending a conference. Prior to each administration, the pile is shuffled and participants are asked to sort the cards into alphabetical order based on the surname of each guest. | Sorting conference labels task. Eighty labels are provided and should be arranged in alphabetical order according to the first name of the respective guest. |
| Proof Reading the hotel leaflet. A leaflet of nine pages with specific typos repetition of letters. A total of 130 (4%) is presented. Participants are asked to mark the errors with a pen. | Proof reading the hotel brochure. A two-page brochure with specific typos repetition of letters. A total of 62 errors (10%) is presented. Participants are asked to identify and rectify errors. |
| Opening and closing the garage doors. At two pre-defined times (6 and 12 min after beginning the task), the participants are asked to remember to open and close the hotel garage doors, in order to allow deliveries. The door is opened by pressing a red button and closed by pressing a black button, both mounted on a single button box placed on the desk. | Waking up guests. Participants are asked to perform two wake-up calls to hotel guests by pressing two buttons on a telephone at two different time points (6 and 12 min after starting the task). |
Participant performance in the Pilot study with the Hotel Task.
| Task | Performance of TBI |
|---|---|
| Number of tasks performed | 3.10 (1.66) |
| Total time in the Compiling customer bills task, in seconds | 143.90 (207.40) |
| Total correct responses in the Compiling customer bills task | 7.00 (12.42) |
| Total number of attempts in the Compiling customer bills task | 7.20 (13.00) |
| Total time in the Sorting the charity collection task, in seconds | 210.10 (187.37) |
| Total correct responses in the Sorting the charity collection task | 122.80 (187.39) |
| Total number of attempts in the Sorting the charity collection task | 126.90 (102.57) |
| Total time in the Proof reading the hotel brochure, in seconds | 51.50 (78.74) |
| Total correct responses in the Proof reading the hotel brochure | 6.30 (9.44) |
| Total number of omissions in the Proof reading the hotel brochure | 6.80 (14.63) |
| Total time in the Sorting conference labels task, in seconds | 368.30 (244.73) |
| Total correct responses in the Sorting conference labels task | 22.50 (22.69) |
| Total number of attempts in the Sorting conference labels task | 34.20 (29.74) |
| Total time in the Looking for promotions in menu task, in seconds | 71.30 (101.85) |
| Total correct responses in the Looking for promotions in menu task | 2.00 (4.13) |
| Total number of attempts in the Looking for promotions in menu task | 2.20 (4.13) |
| Time for waking up the first guest, in seconds | 205.20 (245.70) |
| Time for waking up the second guest, in seconds | 365.80 (387.44) |
Traumatic Brain Injury;
Mean;
Standard deviation;