Literature DB >> 15171798

Delta: a new measure of agreement between two raters.

A Martín Andrés1, P Femia Marzo.   

Abstract

The most common measure of agreement for categorical data is the coefficient kappa. However, kappa performs poorly when the marginal distributions are very asymmetric, it is not easy to interpret, and its definition is based on hypothesis of independence of the responses (which is more restrictive than the hypothesis that kappa has a value of zero). This paper defines a new measure of agreement, delta, 'the proportion of agreements that are not due to chance', which comes from model of multiple-choice tests and does not have the previous limitations. The paper shows that kappa and delta generally take very similar values, except when the marginal distributions are strongly unbalanced. The case of the 2 x 2 tables (which admits very simple solutions) is considered in detail.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15171798     DOI: 10.1348/000711004849268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  13 in total

1.  Kappa and Rater Accuracy: Paradigms and Parameters.

Authors:  Anthony J Conger
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures.

Authors:  Viswanathan Shankar; Shrikant I Bangdiwala
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Regulating Emotion and Identity by Narrating Harm.

Authors:  Monisha Pasupathi; Jacob Billitteri; Cade D Mansfield; Cecilia Wainryb; Grace E Hanley; Kiana Taheri
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Patterns of Father Self Evaluations among Mexican and European American Men and Links to Adolescent Adjustment.

Authors:  Norma J Perez-Brena; Jeffrey T Cookston; William V Fabricius; Delia Saenz
Journal:  Fathering       Date:  2012

5.  Kappa Coefficients for Missing Data.

Authors:  Alexandra De Raadt; Matthijs J Warrens; Roel J Bosker; Henk A L Kiers
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Evaluation of Inter-Observer Reliability of Animal Welfare Indicators: Which Is the Best Index to Use?

Authors:  Mauro Giammarino; Silvana Mattiello; Monica Battini; Piero Quatto; Luca Maria Battaglini; Ana C L Vieira; George Stilwell; Manuela Renna
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method.

Authors:  Marta Miret; Francisco Félix Caballero; Arvind Mathur; Nirmala Naidoo; Paul Kowal; José Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Somnath Chatterji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing agreement between multiple raters with missing rating information, applied to breast cancer tumour grading.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; Andrew G Lynch; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Rudolf Hanka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Brazilian adaptation of the Hotel Task: A tool for the ecological assessment of executive functions.

Authors:  Caroline de Oliveira Cardoso; Nicolle Zimmermann; Camila Borges Paraná; Gigiane Gindri; Ana Paula Almeida de Pereira; Rochele Paz Fonseca
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

10.  Use of facial stereophotogrammetry as a screening tool for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea by dental specialists.

Authors:  Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes; Terry Carlyle; Oyku Dalci; M Ali Darendeliler; Ida Kornerup; Paul W Major; Andrée Montpetit; Benjamin T Pliska; Stacey Quo; Giseon Heo; Carlos Flores Mir
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.