Thomas A Dewland1, Elsayed Z Soliman1, Jose-Miguel Yamal1, Barry R Davis1, Alvaro Alonso1, Christine M Albert1, Lara M Simpson1, L Julian Haywood1, Gregory M Marcus2. 1. From the Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (T.A.D.); Cardiology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC (E.Z.S.); University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston (J.-M.Y., B.R.D., L.M.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (A.A.); Center for Arrhythmia Prevention, Division of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (C.M.A.); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (L.J.H.); and Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (G.M.M.). 2. From the Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (T.A.D.); Cardiology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC (E.Z.S.); University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston (J.-M.Y., B.R.D., L.M.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (A.A.); Center for Arrhythmia Prevention, Division of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (C.M.A.); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (L.J.H.); and Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (G.M.M.). marcusg@medicine.ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines indicate that pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may be considered for primary AF prevention in hypertensive patients, previous studies have yielded conflicting results. We sought to determine whether randomization to lisinopril reduces incident AF or atrial flutter (AFL) compared with chlorthalidone in a large clinical trial cohort with extended post-trial surveillance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a secondary analysis of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial that enrolled hypertensive individuals ≥55 years of age with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine, lisinopril, or chlorthalidone. Individuals with elevated fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were also randomized to pravastatin versus usual care. The primary outcome was the development of either AF or AFL as diagnosed by serial study ECGs or by Medicare claims data. Among 14 837 participants without prevalent AF or AFL, 2514 developed AF/AFL during a mean 7.5±3.2 years of follow-up. Compared with chlorthalidone, randomization to either lisinopril (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15; P=0.46) or amlodipine (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.03; P=0.16) was not associated with a significant reduction in incident AF/AFL. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with chlorthalidone, treatment with lisinopril is not associated with a meaningful reduction in incident AF or AFL among older adults with a history of hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000542.
BACKGROUND: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines indicate that pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may be considered for primary AF prevention in hypertensive patients, previous studies have yielded conflicting results. We sought to determine whether randomization to lisinopril reduces incident AF or atrial flutter (AFL) compared with chlorthalidone in a large clinical trial cohort with extended post-trial surveillance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a secondary analysis of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial that enrolled hypertensive individuals ≥55 years of age with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine, lisinopril, or chlorthalidone. Individuals with elevated fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were also randomized to pravastatin versus usual care. The primary outcome was the development of either AF or AFL as diagnosed by serial study ECGs or by Medicare claims data. Among 14 837 participants without prevalent AF or AFL, 2514 developed AF/AFL during a mean 7.5±3.2 years of follow-up. Compared with chlorthalidone, randomization to either lisinopril (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15; P=0.46) or amlodipine (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.03; P=0.16) was not associated with a significant reduction in incident AF/AFL. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with chlorthalidone, treatment with lisinopril is not associated with a meaningful reduction in incident AF or AFL among older adults with a history of hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000542.
Authors: L Hansson; L H Lindholm; L Niskanen; J Lanke; T Hedner; A Niklason; K Luomanmäki; B Dahlöf; U de Faire; C Mörlin; B E Karlberg; P O Wester; J E Björck Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-02-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Hansson; L H Lindholm; T Ekbom; B Dahlöf; J Lanke; B Scherstén; P O Wester; T Hedner; U de Faire Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-11-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kristian Wachtell; Mika Lehto; Eva Gerdts; Michael H Olsen; Björn Hornestam; Björn Dahlöf; Hans Ibsen; Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Richard B Devereux Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nicole L Glazer; Sascha Dublin; Nicholas L Smith; Benjamin French; Lisa A Jackson; Jennifer B Hrachovec; David S Siscovick; Bruce M Psaty; Susan R Heckbert Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-02-12
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gordon T McInnes; Alberto Zanchetti; Tsushung A Hua Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Elsayed Z Soliman; George Howard; Suzanne Judd; Prashant D Bhave; Virginia J Howard; David M Herrington Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Milad Nazarzadeh; Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes; Zeinab Bidel; Dexter Canoy; Abbas Dehghan; Karl Smith Byrne; Derrick A Bennett; George Davey Smith; Kazem Rahimi Journal: Genome Med Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 15.266