Literature DB >> 10577635

Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study.

L Hansson1, L H Lindholm, T Ekbom, B Dahlöf, J Lanke, B Scherstén, P O Wester, T Hedner, U de Faire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of new antihypertensive drugs has been questioned. We compared the effects of conventional and newer antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in elderly patients.
METHODS: We did a prospective, randomised trial in 6614 patients aged 70-84 years with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 180 mm Hg systolic, > or = 105 mm Hg diastolic, or both). Patients were randomly assigned conventional antihypertensive drugs (atenolol 50 mg, metoprolol 100 mg, pindolol 5 mg, or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg plus amiloride 2.5 mg daily) or newer drugs (enalapril 10 mg or lisinopril 10 mg, or felodipine 2.5 mg or isradipine 2-5 mg daily). We assessed fatal stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and other fatal cardiovascular disease. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Blood pressure was decreased similarly in all treatment groups. The primary combined endpoint of fatal stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and other fatal cardiovascular disease occurred in 221 of 2213 patients in the conventional drugs group (19.8 events per 1000 patient-years) and in 438 of 4401 in the newer drugs group (19.8 per 1000; relative risk 0.99 [95% CI 0.84-1.16], p=0.89). The combined endpoint of fatal and non-fatal stroke, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular mortality occurred in 460 patients taking conventional drugs and in 887 taking newer drugs (0.96 [0.86-1.08], p=0.49).
INTERPRETATION: Old and new antihypertensive drugs were similar in prevention of cardiovascular mortality or major events. Decrease in blood pressure was of major importance for the prevention of cardiovascular events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10577635     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)10327-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  251 in total

1.  Inferiority of calcium channel blockers to cheaper drugs. News item was inaccurate on at least two counts.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

2.  Management of hypertension. Ideal body weight is not realistic goal for lifestyle intervention.

Authors:  J Wilding; G Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

Review 3.  Prevention of ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  G Gubitz; P Sandercock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-09

4.  Beta-blockers as first-line therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  G A Heckman; A Papaioannou; W Parkinson; C A Patterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Recent advances in the management of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  F J Gennari; A S Gennari
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  R S Chen; P Lapuerta
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Prospectively designed overviews of recent trials comparing antihypertensive regimens based on different drug classes.

Authors:  N Chapman; B Neal
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Essential hypertension: the heart and hypertension.

Authors:  K E Berkin; S G Ball
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Matching the right drug to the right patient in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M J Brown
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Daily regimen and compliance with treatment. All available evidence needs to be evaluated.

Authors:  Knut Schroeder; Shah Ebrahim; Tom Fahey; Alan Montgomery; Tim Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.