Literature DB >> 29212677

The minimum follow-up required for radial head arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

P Laumonerie1, N Reina1, P Kerezoudis2, S Declaux1, M E Tibbo2, N Bonnevialle1, P Mansat1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017 were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up, the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard minimum follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were analysed: three were Group I and included 80 implants and 37 were Group II and included 1192 implants. In Group I, the mean time to re-operation was 1.37 years (0 to 11.25), the standard minimum follow-up was 3.25 years; painful loosening was the main indication for re-operation. In Group II, 33 Group II articles (89.2%) reported a minimum follow-up of < 3.25 years.
CONCLUSION: The literature does not provide a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after RHA. The reproducibility of results would be improved by using a minimum follow-up of three years combined with a consensus of the definition of the reasons for failure after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1561-70. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Failure; Follow-up; Radial head arthroplasty; Removal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212677     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0543.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  7 in total

1.  Short to midterm outcomes of one hundred and seventy one MoPyC radial head prostheses: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Laumonerie; Meagan E Tibbo; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Marc Olivier Gauci; Nicolas Reina; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Radial head arthroplasty: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Pierre Laumonerie; Meagan E Tibbo; Nicolas Reina; Thuy Trang Pham; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Radial head fractures.

Authors:  R P van Riet; Mpj van den Bekerom; A Van Tongel; C Spross; R Barco; A C Watts
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-09-25

4.  Results of radial head prostheses implanted during Essex-Lopresti syndrome in multicentric study.

Authors:  Hugo Barret; Luc Favard; Pierre Mansat; Matthias Winter; Philippe Clavert; François Sirveaux; Michel Chammas; Bertrand Coulet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.

Authors:  Caroline D Cristofaro; Thomas H Carter; Neil R Wickramasinghe; Margaret M McQueen; Timothy O White; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Midterm outcomes of 146 EVOLVE Proline modular radial head prostheses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pierre Laumonerie; Maroun Raad; Meagan E Tibbo; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-05-19

7.  Retrospective cohort study on radial head arthroplasty comparing long-term outcomes between valgus type injury and fracture dislocation.

Authors:  Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Chun-Jui Weng; Chih-Hao Chiu; Shih-Sheng Chang; Chun-Ying Cheng; Yi-Sheng Chan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.