| Literature DB >> 33218325 |
Alvin Chao-Yu Chen1, Chun-Jui Weng2, Chih-Hao Chiu2, Shih-Sheng Chang2, Chun-Ying Cheng2, Yi-Sheng Chan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has been commonly adopted for irreparable radial head fractures while little information is addressed on valgus type injury. The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes and radiographic analysis in RHA for valgus type injury with comparison to fracture dislocation injury.Entities:
Keywords: Correlation analysis; Fracture dislocation; Loose fit; Osteolysis; Radial head arthroplasty (RHA); Valgus injury
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33218325 PMCID: PMC7678050 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03767-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Right elbow radiographs from a 54 year-old female patient after radial head arthroplasty. a Anteroposterior view at 3 months. b Anteroposterior at 11 years showing periprosthetic osteolysis (black arrows). c Lateral view at 3 months. d Lateral view at 11 years showing periprosthetic osteolysis (white arrows)
Fig. 2Measurement of periprosthetic radiolucency on anteroposterior view (X-ap) by 3 red lines on radiographs. H red line: width of radial head component on radiographs. S red line: width of stem on radiographs. R red line: maximal width of radiolucency on radiographs. RS: real size in head component of the prosthesis
Patient Characteristics
| Outcome survey | Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.93 ± 13.3 | 40.95 ± 12.16 | .052 |
| Sex | |||
| Men | 4 (29%) | 16 (84%) | |
| Women | 10 (71%) | 3 (16%) | |
| Dominant side injured | 9 (64%) | 9 (47%) | .174 |
| Right arm | 8 (57%) | 10 (53%) | |
| Left arm | 6 (43%) | 9 (47%) | |
| Ligament repair | |||
| Lateral collateral ligament | 0 | 16 (84%) | |
| Medial collateral ligament | 2 (14%) | 1 (5%) | .194 |
| Time from injury to replacement (months) | 6.14 ± 7.72 | 2.03 ± 4.4 | |
| Radial head replacement | |||
| As a primary surgery | 10 (71%) | 15 (79%) | .316 |
| As a revision surgery | 4 (29%)a | 4 (21%) | .316 |
a revision surgery after failed surgical fixation
* A p-value of < 0.05 indicated significant difference
Functional outcome
| Outcome survey | Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latest survey (years) | 9.14 ± 2.28 | 8.95 ± 1.27 | .378 |
| VAS | 1 ± 0.78 | 1.42 ± 1.26 | .140 |
| Range of motion (degree) | 126.79 ± 7.99 | 114.47 ± 19.5 | |
| MEPS | 87.5 ± 10.13 | 80.53 ± 15.27 | .152 |
| QuickDASH score | 6.17 ± 7.33 | 15.43 ± 15.41 | |
| Complication | 3 (21%) | 4 (21%) | .490 |
| Ulnohumeral arthrosis | 1 (7%) | 1 (5%) | |
| Heterotopic ossification | 2 (14%) | 1 (5%) | |
| Stiffness (< 90° motion range) | 0 | 1 (5%) | |
| Second surgery | 0 | 1 (5%) |
VAS Visual analog scale
MEPS Mayo Elbow Performance Score
QuickDASH score Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score
* A p-value of < 0.05 indicated significant difference
Radiographic outcome
| Radiographic analysis | Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with radiolucency | 9 (64%) | 17 (89%) | |
| Radiolucency score | 2.14 ± 2.47 | 2.92 ± 2.41 | .369 |
| Correlationa with VAS | .130 | ||
| Correlation with MEPS | |||
| Correlation with QuickDASH | .159 | .010 |
VAS Visual analog scale
MEPS Mayo Elbow Performance Score
QuickDASH score Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score
a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)
b PCC between −0.3 to −0.5 shows weak to moderate negative correlation
* A p-value of < 0.05 indicated significant difference