Literature DB >> 29210310

Outcome of pinning in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: risk factors associated with avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and femoral impingement.

Alexandru Ulici1, Madalina Carp1, Iulia Tevanov1, Catalin Alexandru Nahoi1, Alin Gabriel Sterian1, Dan Cosma2.   

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the principal risk factors that could lead to the most common long-term complications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, such as avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and hip impingement. Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study and evaluated patients (70 patients, 81 hips) who were treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 2010 to 2015 and who underwent pinning. We measured the severity of displacement radiologically using the Southwick angle. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the most frequent long-term complications of avascular necrosis (AVN), chondrolysis, and femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). Results We found seven cases of AVN, 14 cases of chondrolysis, and 31 hips had an α angle of 60°. Sex, ambulation, and symptoms did not affect development of these complications. Patients with a normal weight were almost two times more likely to develop FAI. Patients with moderate and severe slips had a similar percentage of AVN. In severe slips, 85.7% of patients had an α angle higher than 60°. Conclusions This study shows that severe slips have a higher risk of developing AVN and hip impingement. Every patient who suffers from SCFE (even the mildest forms) should be regularly checked for FAI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral acetabular impingement; adolescent hip; avascular necrosis; chondrolysis; radiograph; slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29210310      PMCID: PMC6023047          DOI: 10.1177/0300060517731683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


Introduction

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common disorders affecting adolescent hips, and usually appears during the early adolescent growth spurt. In SCFE, the epiphysis stays in the acetabulum while the neck is displaced anteriorly and rotates externally. This creates a varus-extension and external rotational deformity of the femoral neck. Clinically, SCFE often presents with knee or thigh pain and limping because of anatomical innervation of the hip. This causes delayed treatment.[1,2] The surgical treatments of SCFE have different methods of stabilization, including closed reduction and pinning, in situ pinning, and open osteotomies and fixation.[3] The most frequent complication is avascular necrosis (AVN), and different rates have been reported for this complication with different treatments. AVN usually has better results with in situ pinning for chronic SCFE and closed reduction and pinning for acute SCFE. Open reduction with different osteotomies is used in severe acute slips because decompression of the joint is needed.[4] Besides AVN, another long-term complication is persistent deformities of the proximal femur, which can cause femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). A multi-centre French study concluded that prevention of AVN, osteoarthritis (OA) and FAI should be considered as the goal of treatment by using the anterior Dunn procedure for severe slips.[5] In the SCFE-affected hip, the presence of FAI causes mechanical abnormalities that can lead to osteoarthritis due to repetitive injury to the articular cartilage. Considering this situation, preventing impingement is preferable, rather than treating it later.[6] Determining long-term functional and radiological outcomes of different treatments for SCFE related to hip impingement is important. A previous study examined 11 hips with SCFE that were treated with in situ fixation, with a follow-up of 26 years.[7] The authors determined that in situ fixation for moderate and severe SCFE had poor functional results because of FAI and osteoarthritis (OA). In typical SCFE, the metaphysis is in a pathological anterolateral position. Because of the healing process, an anterolateral protuberance, called a bump or cam deformity, usually appears on the proximal femur eroding the acetabulum. In the long term, this can lead to hip pain and decreased range of motion due to osteoarthritis. This is common in severe slips, but even a mild slip can cause FAI.[8,9] This study aimed to assess the main risk factors that could lead to the most common long-term complications of SCFE, namely AVN, chondrolysis, and hip impingement.

Material and methods

A single-centre, retrospective study, which evaluated the medical records of patients who were treated for SCFE from 2010 to 2015, was conducted. Data from all of the patients’ records were analysed, such as age, sex, body mass index, medical history at the time of diagnosis, date of surgery, and outcome of surgery. Patients who underwent pinning with or without closed reduction were selected. We excluded patients who underwent femoral osteotomies. The series consisted of 70 patients and 81 displaced hips. Ethics committee approval was not required for this retrospective study. The patients provided written and verbal informed consent. The patients were classified as acute if they had pain or limping less than 3 weeks, chronic if the pain or limping lasted for longer than 3 weeks, or acute on chronic. Based on this classification of SCFE, the patients were surgically treated by closed reduction and internal fixations with pins (1, 2, 3), or in situ fixation with pins. Based on Loder’s criteria, the patients were categorized as stable or unstable. The patients were considered to have a stable hip when they could bear weight with or without crutches and unstable if they were unable to bear weight.[10] We measured the severity of the displacement radiologically using the Southwick angle, which was measured on the primary frog-leg view at the time of presentation. The Southwick angle is the difference between the angle measured on the affected side and the normal side. This angle was measured between the line at the base of the capital femoral epiphysis and a line perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the femoral shaft. The degree of slip was classified as mild if the angle was less than 30°, moderate if the angle was between 30° and 60°, and severe if the angle was greater than 60°.[11,12] Postoperative radiographs were evaluated to determine the presence of the most frequent long-term complications, which are AVN, chondrolysis and FAI. The minimum follow-up period was 18 months (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and femoral acetabular impingement after moderate displacement treated with pinning

After removal of the pins, the presence of sclerosis and cyst formation were observed, as well as cam deformity and narrowing of the joint space.

Avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and femoral acetabular impingement after moderate displacement treated with pinning After removal of the pins, the presence of sclerosis and cyst formation were observed, as well as cam deformity and narrowing of the joint space. We reviewed the radiographic signs of AVN, such as collapse of the femoral head, sclerosis, and cyst formation. Narrowing of the femoroacetabular space was measured and we classified it as chondrolysis when it was less than 3 mm.[13] To determine the cam deformity responsible for hip impingement, we performed measurements of the α angle. The measurements were performed on radiographs at follow-up after pinning. The α angle was measured on lateral radiographs according to Notzli’s method as follows: the angle between a line from the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the neck and a second line from the centre of the femoral head point on the antero-lateral neck–head junctions.[14,15] Diagnosis of impingement was determined by an angle greater than 60° and the presence of a radiological bump.[7] To examine the data, we used Microsoft Excel and calculated the risk ratio with www.medcalc.org. We examined the potential risk and predisposing factors for patients with and those without complications, such as AVN, chondrolysis, and FAI, using odds ratios and relative risks. We used a data warehouse to optimize access to our data and for better operation of our data.[16,17]

Results

The average follow-up was 30 months. Among 70 patients and 81 hips, 11 patients had bilateral involvement (13%). There were 22 females and 48 males who presented with limping, groin pain, and loss of internal rotation. The age of the patients ranged from 9 to 16 years and the mean age of patients who underwent surgery was 12.5 years. We calculated the body mass index and 58 patients (82.8%) were overweight. With regard to symptoms, there were 20 patients with acute SCFE (25%), 47 patients with chronic SCFE (58%), and 14 with acute episodes in the chronic phase (17%). With regard to ambulation, 15 patients had unstable SCFE (18.5%) and 66 had stable SCFE (81.5%). To investigate the severity of displacement, we measured 32 hips with mild displacement, 41 hips with moderate displacement, and seven hips with severe displacement. Seven cases of AVN were observed and six of these cases appeared in overweight patients. Table 1 shows a univariate model of risk factors for AVN that were treated individually. There were no significant correlations between sex, ambulation, or symptoms and development of AVN (all P > 0.05). Among the 14 patients with chondrolysis, nine were overweight. Table 2 shows the risk factors predisposing to chondrolysis. These risk factors were treated individually. There were no correlations between sex, the evaluated side, or ambulation and development of chondrolysis. There was no effect of sex of the patients, ambulation, or symptoms in developing FAI (Table 3). Patients with a normal weight were almost two times more likely to develop FAI (risk ratio: 1.8). Table 4 shows the percentage of AVN, chondrolysis, and FAI in every category of slip. In moderate and severe slips, we observed a similar percentage of AVN. There were no differences in the category of slip for chondrolysis. With regard to FAI, for severe slips, 85.7% of patients developed an α angle higher than 60°.
Table 1.

Characteristics and risk and predisposing factors associated with AVN in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning

VariableWith AVNWithout AVNRisk ratio95% CIP
Sex
 Male4440.60.1493–2.52020.49
 Female3191.60.3998–6.69820.49
Ambulation
 Stable4620.30.0756–1.21420.09
 Unstable3123.30.8236–13.22290.09
Symptoms
 Acute3172.110.5126–8.76400.29
 Chronic/acute on chronic4610.40.1141–1.95080.29

AVN, avascular necrosis.

Table 2.

Characteristics of risks and predisposing factors associated with chondrolysis in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning

With chondrolysisWithout chondrolysisRisk ratio95% CIP
Sex
 Male10481.80.4508–7.97840.38
 Female2200.50.1253–2.21810.38
Evaluated side
 Right8301.50.5752–3.95780.4
 Left6370.60.2527–1.73860.4
Ambulation
 Stable10560.560.2059–1.56780.27
 Unstable4111.760.6378–4.85650.27

CI, confidence interval.

Table 3.

Study characteristics of risks and predisposing factors associated with FAI, reflected by the α angle in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning

Patients with FAI, α angle > 60Patients without FAI, α angle ≤ 60Risk ratio95% CIP
Ambulation
 Stable24350.750.4187–1.36300.35
 Unstable761.320.7337–2.38830.35
Weight
 Normal weight941.81.1366–3.03290.01
 Overweight22370.530.3297–0.87980.01

CI, confidence interval; FAI, femoral acetabular impingement.

Table 4.

Complications based on slip grade in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning

Mild (N = 33)Moderate (N = 32)Severe (N = 7)
AVN
 With AVN1 (3%)5 (15.5%)1 (14.2%)
 Without AVN32276
Chondrolysis
 With chondrolysis3 (9%)7 (21%)2 (28%)
 Without chondrolysis30255
FAI
 With FAI4 (12%)21 (65.6%)6 (85.7%)
 Without FAI29111

AVN, avascular necrosis; FAI, femoral acetabular impingement. Data are presented as n (%)

Characteristics and risk and predisposing factors associated with AVN in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning AVN, avascular necrosis. Characteristics of risks and predisposing factors associated with chondrolysis in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning CI, confidence interval. Study characteristics of risks and predisposing factors associated with FAI, reflected by the α angle in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning CI, confidence interval; FAI, femoral acetabular impingement. Complications based on slip grade in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who underwent pinning AVN, avascular necrosis; FAI, femoral acetabular impingement. Data are presented as n (%)

Discussion

This study showed no significant correlations between risk factors such as sex, the evaluated side, ambulation, weight, and symptoms and long-term complications (AVN, chondrolysis and FAI). The exact aetiology of chondrolysis has not yet been determined, but chondrolysis occurs in treated and untreated hips, and an immune mechanism is thought to be involved.[13] Hip impingement is considered an important factor for developing OA. A multi-centre study reviewed 69 stable hips for signs of remodelling of femoral head-neck junction.[14] This study showed that in patients with SCFE, almost 30% of the hips had residual deformities that could cause FAI. Patients with moderate SCFE and with FAI may suffer from micro-trauma of a cam deformity and this can occur during workouts or daily activities. This micro-trauma produces irreversible chondral damage, which results in degenerative diseases of the hip. Recurrent trauma can lead to avulsion of the cartilage from the subchondral bone. The grade of asphericity of the femoral head that is responsible for FAI can be determined by calculating the α angle, the femoral offset, or the offset ratio.[18] Evolution of hip impingement without treatment leads to recurrent synovitis due to mechanical stress on the articular cartilage. This situation results in OA pain and progressive loss of motion.[19] This is the reason why long-term follow-up of patients with mild and severe slips is required. Other factors that are a risk for the appearance of FAI need to be determined.[20,21] We found that normal weight patients had a higher risk of developing FAI compared with overweight patients. In moderate and severe slips, we observed a similar percentage of AVN. This finding is in contrast to previous reports, which showed that a severe slip has a higher percentage of AVN.[4,5] There are some limitations to our study. One limitation is that radiological evaluation was performed by the same examiner. Additionally, diagnosis of FAI should be established in association with a clinical exam, but this was limited because of restricted access to clinical follow-up of some of the patients. The normal α angle is controversial. The α angle was initially used for magnetic resonance imaging data, but it is starting to be applied to radiographs. Pollard et al.[22] considered that a positive diagnosis of FAI can be considered for an angle of greater than 63° and another study suggested angles of greater than 50°.[18] A further study considered 60° to be the upper limit for the α angle.[14] Every patient that suffers from SCFE (even the mildest forms) should be regularly checked for FAI. This is because, in time, even a mild slip can evolve or degenerate into hip impingement causing premature osteoarthritis. If this impingement is diagnosed early, before any signs of osteoarthritis are observed, it can be treated arthroscopically with a favourable long-term outcome.
  20 in total

1.  Remodelling of femoral head-neck junction in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Mio Akiyama; Yasuharu Nakashima; Toshio Kitano; Tomoyuki Nakamura; Kazuyuki Takamura; Yusuke Kohno; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  In situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: perspectives in 2011.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Chondrolysis and avascular necrosis: complications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  J P Lubicky
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  R T Loder
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  W O Southwick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  The epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an update.

Authors:  Charles L Lehmann; Raymond R Arons; Randall T Loder; Michael G Vitale
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  S Z Basheer; A P Cooper; R Maheshwari; B Balakumar; S Madan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability.

Authors:  R T Loder; B S Richards; P S Shapiro; L R Reznick; D D Aronson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Outcome of in situ pinning in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of risk factors associated with avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Thomas Palocaren; Larry Holmes; Kenneth Rogers; Shanmuga Jay Kumar
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  3 in total

1.  Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.

Authors:  Maureen Purcell; Rustin Reeves; Matthew Mayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Traumatic Hip Dislocation Associated with Proximal Femoral Physeal Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Oana Haram; Elena Odagiu; Catalin Florea; Iulia Tevanov; Madalina Carp; Alexandru Ulici
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Advantages of Telescopic Screw in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Treatment: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alexandru Ulici; Adelina Ionescu; Diana Dogaru; Olivia Hotoboc; Catalin Nahoi; Cristian Zamfir; Madalina Carp
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.