Literature DB >> 25442644

Arthroscopic treatment of mild to moderate deformity after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: intra-operative findings and functional outcomes.

James D Wylie1, James T Beckmann1, Travis G Maak1, Stephen K Aoki2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify intra-articular pathology during arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE)-related femoroacetabular impingement and determine functional outcomes after treatment.
METHODS: Nine hips in 9 patients (6 male and 3 female patients; mean age, 17.5 years; age range, 13.5 to 26.9 years) underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement after in situ pinning of the SCFE. Medical records, radiographs, and intraoperative images were reviewed to determine the severity of disease and damage to the hip joints. For all patients, we obtained the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) preoperatively and at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively, as well as a Likert scale of perceived change in physical activity.
RESULTS: All 9 treated patients had some degree of labral or acetabular cartilage injury at the time of arthroscopy, which was a mean of 58.6 months (range, 18 to 169 months) after in situ pinning. The alpha angle improved from 75° preoperatively to 46° postoperatively (P < .001). The mean follow-up period was 28.6 months (range, 12.6 to 55.6 months). The mean modified Harris Hip Score improved from 63.6 preoperatively to 91.4 postoperatively (P = .005). Similarly, the mean HOS activities-of-daily living scale improved from 70.2 to 93.3 (P = .010), and the HOS sports scale improved from 53.4 to 88.9 (P = .004). Most patients reported significant improvement on a physical-activity Likert scale, with 4 reporting much improved, 3 reporting improved, and 1 reporting slightly improved physical activity. One patient reported an unchanged activity level. No patients reported a worse activity level after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-SCFE cartilage and/or labral damage develops in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate SCFE deformity, and arthroscopic treatment improved functional outcomes in a small cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442644     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  High Survivorship and Little Osteoarthritis at 10-year Followup in SCFE Patients Treated With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Milan Milosevic; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Theddy Slongo; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Arthroscopic Subcapital Realignment in Chronic and Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  Bruno Dutra Roos; Marcelo Camargo de Assis; Milton Valdomiro Roos; Antero Camisa Júnior; Ezequiel Moreno Ungaretti Lima
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-05-29

Review 3.  Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroaceabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; Kyle Martin; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Andrew Duong; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Evolving Understanding of and Treatment Approaches to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-06

Review 5.  Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony Habib; Chloe E Haldane; Seper Ekhtiari; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  How Common Is Femoral Retroversion and How Is it Affected by Different Measurement Methods in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Jennifer R Kallini; Mariana G Ferrer; Patricia E Miller; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A systematic review.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; D de Sa; J Kay; F Findakli; A Duong; N Simunovic; Y Yi-Meng; O R Ayeni
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis management and the arthroscope.

Authors:  F Accadbled; O May; C Thévenin-Lemoine; J Sales de Gauzy
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of management in the hip impingement era.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Mahran; Mostafa M Baraka; Hany M Hefny
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-05-17

10.  Comparison between modified Dunn procedure and in situ fixation for severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Trisolino; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Gallone; Pedro Santos Leite; Giovanni Pignatti
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.