Literature DB >> 23814615

Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective.

Harish S Hosalkar1, Nirav K Pandya, James D Bomar, Dennis R Wenger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a result of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has recently gained significant attention. Seen as an intermediate step toward the development of early osteoarthritis, symptomatic FAI develops in SCFE patients who have residual hip deformity characterized by relative posterior and medial displacement of the capital femoral epiphysis, leading to an anterolateral prominence of the metaphysis which abuts on the acetabular rim. This results in a decreased range of hip motion as well as progressive labral damage and articular cartilage injury, which cause symptoms of FAI. All degrees of slips from mild to severe can develop impingement.
METHODS: The existing literature on the subject was thoroughly reviewed and all levels of studies that have made any meaningful changes to clinical practice were considered.
RESULTS: Based on the literature review, current practice trends, and our own institutional practice pattern, all treatment options for SCFE in the impingement era have been presented with an open discussion regarding potential benefits and limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: Several surgical options exist for the SCFE patient who develops FAI. These are largely determined by the degree of deformity present and severity of the initial slip. Extraarticular (intertrochanteric, base of the neck) as well as subcapital osteotomies can be utilized with a goal of restoring proximal femoral anatomy in order to minimize the effect of the anterolateral prominence in more severe deformities. Patients with milder deformities can undergo osteochondroplasty of the femoral head and neck to remove impinging structures via either an open or arthroscopic approach. Also, proximal femoral osteotomy and open head-neck recontouring can be combined. Finally, patients who develop pain very early after in situ pinning must also be examined for potential iatrogenic screw-head impingement as a source of their pain and decreased hip motion, in addition to abnormalities in the proximal femoral anatomy. There are many centers that are approaching acute unstable SCFE patients as well as the more displaced stable cases with open reduction techniques that seem to be demonstrating good mid-term results. The goal of treatment is to improve patient function, alleviate hip pain, and to delay or prevent the development of early degenerative changes in adolescents and young adults. Prospective multi-center studies will be necessary so as to determine what methods work best in treatment and delay the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impingement; SCFE; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Year:  2012        PMID: 23814615      PMCID: PMC3399996          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0397-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  49 in total

1.  The geometry of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: implications for movement, impingement, and corrective osteotomy.

Authors:  G T Rab
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Development of the acetabulum in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a three-dimensional analysis based on computed tomography.

Authors:  J Kordelle; J A Richolt; M Millis; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

4.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis.

Authors:  M Leunig; M M Casillas; M Hamlet; O Hersche; H Nötzli; T Slongo; R Ganz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-08

5.  Extracapsular base of neck osteotomy versus Southwick osteotomy in treatment of moderate to severe chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Hani El-Mowafi; Gamal El-Adl; Mohamed R El-Lakkany
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ.

Authors:  C R Fraitzl; W Käfer; M Nelitz; H Reichel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-12

7.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis technique of percutaneous in situ fixation.

Authors:  R T Morrissy
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  [Imhäuser's osteotomy in the florid gliding process. Observations on the corresponding work of B.G. Weber].

Authors:  G Imhäuser
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1966-12

9.  Slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis. Treatment.

Authors:  B Howorth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Christoph Zilkens; Samantha Spencer; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  19 in total

1.  Multiplanar CT assessment of femoral head displacement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Jerry R Dwek; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-06-23

2.  High Survivorship and Little Osteoarthritis at 10-year Followup in SCFE Patients Treated With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Milan Milosevic; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Theddy Slongo; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Is the acetabulum retroverted in slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Venkatadass Krishnamoorthy; Bernd Bittersohl; James D Bomar; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  An Updated Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Luc M Fortier; Daniel Popovsky; Maggie M Durci; Haley Norwood; William F Sherman; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Risk factors for early symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement following in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Melissa M Allen; Ramesh B Ghanta; Matthew Lahey; Scott B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Does a History of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients Undergoing Femoroacetabular Osteoplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement Affect Outcomes Scores or Risk of Reoperation?

Authors:  Ryan Sutton; Steven Yacovelli; Hamed Vahedi; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is the Acetabulum Retroverted in SCFE? A Study of Acetabular Morphology in Indian Children with SCFE.

Authors:  K Venkatadass; S Muthukumar; A Gomathi; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Idiopathic Cam Morphology Is Not Caused by Subclinical Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: An MRI and CT Study.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Andrew T Pennock
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-06

9.  Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty in patients with mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis after in situ fixation.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Patrick O Zingg; Claudio Dora; Eric Frey; Stefan Dierauer; Leonhard E Ramseier
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Treatment of chronic, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis via surgical hip dislocation with combined osteochondroplasty and Imhauser osteotomy.

Authors:  J B Erickson; W P Samora; K E Klingele
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.