Literature DB >> 29209852

Clinical predictors for satisfaction with incus vibroplasty: a preliminary study.

Jae Joon Han1, Jihye Rhee2, Jae-Jin Song1, Ja-Won Koo1, Byung Yoon Choi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the subjective satisfaction after incus vibroplasty and to determine predictive factors affecting patient satisfaction in sensorineural hearing loss.
DESIGN: A retrospective review of audiological data and an additional survey about subjective satisfaction after surgery were performed in 14 patients who underwent incus vibroplasty surgery. A numeric rating scale reflecting the degree of satisfaction after incus vibroplasty, compared with experiences using a conventional hearing aid, was used. Patients who showed median or better satisfaction were deemed the highly satisfied (HS) group, and the others were deemed the less satisfied (LS) group. To find the predictive factors correlated with satisfaction for incus vibroplasty, comparative analysis between two groups was performed.
RESULTS: We found that the numeric rating scale for satisfaction was variable, ranged from 0 to 10, and was negatively correlated with age at operation (p < 0.01). The HS group had a younger age (27.6 ± 22.2 years) and better preoperative air conduction threshold at 250 Hz (20.7 ± 7.9 dB) than the LS group (68.0 ± 9.7 years, 32.1 ± 10.7 dB). The LS group (13.6 ± 9.9 dB) showed a larger change of air-bone gap after surgery than the HS group (5.7 ± 6.7 dB) at 250 Hz (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Age at operation and the preoperative air conduction threshold level at 250 Hz appear to be potential predictive factors for subjective satisfaction with incus vibroplasty. Furthermore, more conservative selection of candidates and caution during surgery, considering inevitable air-bone gap development postoperatively, may be necessary to achieve higher satisfaction for incus vibroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Incus vibroplasty; Low frequency; Patient satisfaction; Predictive factor; Vibrant Soundbridge

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29209852     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4823-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.

Authors:  J S Gravel; N Fausel; C Liskow; J Chobot
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; John J Rosowski; Susan E Voss; Ellen O'Neil; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.

Authors:  H Dillon; A James; J Ginis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Anna-Lena Hinze; Timo Gerdes; Susan Busch; Rolf Salcher; Burkard Schwab; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality.

Authors:  J L Punch; E L Beck
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1980-08

6.  [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].

Authors:  T Lenarz; B P Weber; P R Issing; D Gnadeberg; K Ambjørnsen; K F Mack; M Winter
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 7.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

8.  [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].

Authors:  T Rader
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Functional gain of already implanted hearing devices in patients with sensorineural hearing loss of varied origin and extent: Berlin experience.

Authors:  Rüdiger Junker; Manfred Gross; Ingo Todt; Arne Ernst
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Impact of mastoidectomy on simple tympanic membrane perforation repair.

Authors:  Benjamin M McGrew; C Gary Jackson; Michael E Glasscock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.