Byron H Lee1, Emily C Zabor2, Daniel Tennenbaum1, Helena Furberg2, Nicole Benfante1, Jonathan A Coleman1, Edgar A Jaimes3, Paul Russo4. 1. Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Renal Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. russop@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To understand the longitudinal renal function trends in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recovery. METHODS: 147 patients were available for analysis. Longitudinal eGFR trends were assessed by plotting each patient's eGFR measurements over time. The patient population was dichotomized using eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Cumulative incidence and competing risk regression analysis were used to estimate recovery of postoperative eGFR to the preoperative level and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with eGFR recovery. RESULTS: Median age was 68.7 years and median preoperative eGFR was 55.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. 63.6% were male and 95.8% were white. The cumulative incidence of eGFR recovery was significantly higher in patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.01), with recovery rates at 2 years of 56.6% vs. 27.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative hydronephrosis (HR 1.80) and preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.87) were associated with increased chance of eGFR recovery. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients with preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 achieved eGFR recovery within the first 3 years after RNU, and hydronephrosis was a significant predictor of recovery. These findings should be considered when counseling patients regarding chronic kidney disease progression after RNU and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for high risk tumors.
PURPOSE: To understand the longitudinal renal function trends in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recovery. METHODS: 147 patients were available for analysis. Longitudinal eGFR trends were assessed by plotting each patient's eGFR measurements over time. The patient population was dichotomized using eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Cumulative incidence and competing risk regression analysis were used to estimate recovery of postoperative eGFR to the preoperative level and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with eGFR recovery. RESULTS: Median age was 68.7 years and median preoperative eGFR was 55.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. 63.6% were male and 95.8% were white. The cumulative incidence of eGFR recovery was significantly higher in patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.01), with recovery rates at 2 years of 56.6% vs. 27.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative hydronephrosis (HR 1.80) and preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.87) were associated with increased chance of eGFR recovery. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients with preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 achieved eGFR recovery within the first 3 years after RNU, and hydronephrosis was a significant predictor of recovery. These findings should be considered when counseling patients regarding chronic kidney disease progression after RNU and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for high risk tumors.
Authors: Jeffrey J Leow; William Martin-Doyle; André P Fay; Toni K Choueiri; Steven L Chang; Joaquim Bellmunt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-03-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Thomas Seisen; Ross E Krasnow; Joaquim Bellmunt; Morgan Rouprêt; Jeffrey J Leow; Stuart R Lipsitz; Malte W Vetterlein; Mark A Preston; Nawar Hanna; Adam S Kibel; Maxine Sun; Toni K Choueiri; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Steven L Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Seisen; Benoit Peyronnet; Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig; Harman M Bruins; Cathy Yuhong Yuan; Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Bas W G van Rhijn; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Matthew G Kaag; Rebecca L O'Malley; Padraic O'Malley; Guilherme Godoy; Mang Chen; Marc C Smaldone; Ronald L Hrebinko; Jay D Raman; Bernard Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Michael D Stifelman; Samir S Taneja; William C Huang Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brian R Lane; Armine K Smith; Benjamin T Larson; Michael C Gong; Steven C Campbell; Derek Raghavan; Robert Dreicer; Donna E Hansel; Andrew J Stephenson Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Alessandro Tafuri; Michele Marchioni; Clara Cerrato; Andrea Mari; Riccardo Tellini; Katia Odorizzi; Alessandro Veccia; Daniele Amparore; Aliasger Shakir; Umberto Carbonara; Andrea Panunzio; Federica Trovato; Michele Catellani; Letizia M I Janello; Lorenzo Bianchi; Giacomo Novara; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Riccardo Schiavina; Elisa De Lorenzis; Paolo Parma; Sebastiano Cimino; Ottavio De Cobelli; Francesco Maiorino; Pierluigi Bove; Fabio Crocerossa; Francesco Cantiello; David D'Andrea; Federica Di Cosmo; Francesco Porpiglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Emanuele Montanari; Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero; Giovanni Liguori; Carlo Trombetta; Guglielmo Mantica; Marco Borghesi; Carlo Terrone; Francesco Del Giudice; Alessandro Sciarra; Andrea Galosi; Marco Moschini; Shahrokh F Shariat; Marta Di Nicola; Andrea Minervini; Matteo Ferro; Maria Angela Cerruto; Luigi Schips; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Alessandro Antonelli Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Sang Hun Song; Chang Hee Ye; Sangchul Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Jong Jin Oh Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 4.553