Literature DB >> 20564402

Chronic kidney disease after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and implications for the administration of perioperative chemotherapy.

Brian R Lane1, Armine K Smith, Benjamin T Larson, Michael C Gong, Steven C Campbell, Derek Raghavan, Robert Dreicer, Donna E Hansel, Andrew J Stephenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is poorly defined, both before and after nephrouretectomy. Although multimodal treatment paradigms for UTUC are under-developed, this has important implications on patients' ability to receive cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (CBCC).
METHODS: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula in 336 patients with UTUC, who were treated at the Cleveland Clinic by nephroureterectomy since 1992. An eGFR cutoff of 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was used to determine the presence of CKD and eligibility for CBCC.
RESULTS: Median age was 72 years and median preoperative eGFR was 59 mL/min/1.73m(2). Before nephroureterectomy, only 48% of patients were eligible to receive CBCC and this decreased to 22% postoperatively (P < .001). In the 144 patients with pT2-pT4 and/or pN1-pN3 disease who are suitable to receive CBCC, these proportions were 40% and 24%, respectively (P = .009). Although 50 patients overall received some form of perioperative chemotherapy, only 3 and 11 patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant CBCC, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CKD is prevalent in the UTUC population and a minority of patients has an optimal eGFR to receive neoadjuvant CBCC. Nephrouretectomy may eliminate CBCC as a therapeutic option in 49% of high-risk patients if it is deferred to the adjuvant setting. Multimodal treatment strategies for UTUC should focus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as few patients are eligible for adjuvant CBCC because of the substantial decline in eGFR caused by nephroureterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564402     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  52 in total

1.  Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Oncological and renal outcomes of segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Ryo Nakayama; Tomomi Haba; Makoto Kawaguchi; Akira Komiya; Hiroshi Koike
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

4.  Systemic chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Syed M Jafri; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Predictive tools for clinical decision-making and counseling of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Sibani Mangal; Morgan Roupret; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sima Porten; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Lianchun Xiao; Vitaly Margulis; Ashish M Kamat; Christopher G Wood; Eric Jonasch; Colin P N Dinney; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The result of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized pT3 upper urinary tract carcinoma in a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Yasutomo Nakai; Masashi Nakayama; Takeshi Ujike; Go Tanigawa; Yutaka Ono; Akihito Kamoto; Tsuyosi Takada; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Hitoshi Takayama; Kazuo Nishimura; Norio Nonomura; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Segmental ureterectomy is not inferior to radical nephroureterectomy for either middle or distal ureter urothelial cell carcinomas within 3.5 cm.

Authors:  Chen Fang; Xin Xie; Tianyuan Xu; Wei He; Hongchao He; Xiaojing Wang; Yu Zhu; Zhoujun Shen; Yuan Shao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Sophie Hurel; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen; Eva Comperat; Véronique Phé; Stéphane Droupy; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Xavier Cathelineau; Laurent Guy; Olivier Cussenot; Adil Ouzzane; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alain Ruffion; Pierre Colin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Current status of systemic chemotherapy for octogenarians with advanced urothelial cancer in Japan: a Japanese multi-institutional study (CURE study).

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Matsui; Osamu Ogawa; Ryutaro Ishitsuka; Jun Miyazaki; Takamitsu Inoue; Susumu Kageyama; Mikio Sugimoto; Koji Mitsuzuka; Yusuke Shiraishi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Hironobu Wakeda; Takeshi Nomoto; Eiji Kikuchi; Keiko Fujie; Naoto Keino; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.