Literature DB >> 29207264

Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons.

Benjamin J De Corte1, Victor M Navarro2, Edward A Wasserman3.   

Abstract

Considerable research in cognitive science, neuroscience, and developmental science has revealed that the temporal, spatial, and numerical features of a stimulus can interact with one another [1,2], as when larger stimuli are perceived as lasting longer than smaller stimuli. These findings have inspired the prominent hypothesis that time, space, and number are processed by a 'common magnitude system', which represents these dimensions via the same unit of magnitude [3,4]. According to current theorizing, the parietal cortex mediates this system [4]. To test the species generality and neuroanatomical foundations of this hypothesis, we asked whether space-time interactions can be observed in birds. Unlike mammals, birds lack a cortex [5,6]; rather, they possess a neuron-dense pallium that is organized in clusters, in contrast to the laminar structure of the mammalian cortex [7]. Despite these striking neuroanatomical disparities, we observed reliable space-time interactions in pigeons. Our findings suggest that common magnitude systems are more widespread among animals than previously believed and need not be cortically dependent in all species.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29207264     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Choice biases in no-sample and delay testing in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Ana Sousa
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Transfer from Number to Size Reveals Abstract Coding of Magnitude in Honeybees.

Authors:  Maria Bortot; Gionata Stancher; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-05-04

3.  The association of brightness with number/duration in human newborns.

Authors:  Cory D Bonn; Maria-Eirini Netskou; Arlette Streri; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Application of an abstract concept across magnitude dimensions by fish.

Authors:  Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Caroline H Brennan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Neurons in the Dorso-Central Division of Zebrafish Pallium Respond to Change in Visual Numerosity.

Authors:  Andrea Messina; Davide Potrich; Ilaria Schiona; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Scott E Fraser; Caroline H Brennan; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Recalibrating timing behavior via expected covariance between temporal cues.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Rebecca R Della Valle; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Lowered Rhythm Tapping Ability in Patients With Constructional Apraxia After Stroke.

Authors:  Naomi Kobinata; Hideto Yoshikawa; Yuji Iwasaka; Nobuyuki Kawate
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Numerosities and Other Magnitudes in the Brains: A Comparative View.

Authors:  Elena Lorenzi; Matilde Perrino; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  Response of male and female domestic chicks to change in the number (quantity) of imprinting objects.

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire; Rosa Rugani; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.