Literature DB >> 33387081

Choice biases in no-sample and delay testing in pigeons (Columba livia).

Carlos Pinto1, Ana Sousa2.   

Abstract

In experimental tasks that involve stimuli that vary along a quantitative continuum, some choice biases are commonly found. Take, for instance, a matching-to-sample task where animals must, following the presentation of sample stimuli (that differ in duration), choose between two or more comparison stimuli. In tests where no sample is presented there is usually a bias towards the comparison that is correct following the shortest sample. To examine some aspects of these choice biases, pigeons were trained in a symbolic matching-to-sample task with two durations of keylight as samples, where key pecking had to be maintained during sample presentation. Firstly, even though animals were required to attend to the sample, a preference for the "short" comparison in no-sample testing was found. This result disproves an account where this effect was hypothesized to happen due to non-programmed learning resulting from the animals failing to attend to some trials. Secondly, even though a bias for "short" was found in both no-sample and delay testing, the extent of the biases differed between tasks, thus suggesting that forgetting the sample presented during a delay does not necessarily land the animal in a state similar to presenting no sample at all to begin with.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Choice; Delayed matching-to-sample; Discrimination learning; Pigeon; Symbolic matching-to-sample

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387081     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01457-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.

Authors:  Stephen Olejnik; James Algina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

2.  Processing of empty and filled time intervals in pigeons.

Authors:  Douglas S Grant; Diane C Talarico
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

4.  Unraveling sources of stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Armando Machado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Coding in pigeons: Multiple-coding versus single-code/default strategies.

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Armando Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.

Authors:  J G Fetterman; D MacEwen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Victor M Navarro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The equality of quantity.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Time and number discrimination in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli: a developmental approach.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; Angélique Clément; Michel Fayol
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-01

Review 10.  Beyond the number domain.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Michael L Platt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.