Literature DB >> 29204653

National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).

Fadar Oliver Otite1, Priyank Khandelwal1, Amer M Malik1, Seemant Chaturvedi1.   

Abstract

Importance: The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST) showed greater safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients younger than 70 years and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in those older than 70 years. It is unknown how the result of CREST has influenced carotid revascularization choices in the United States. Objective: To evaluate national patterns in CAS performance in patients older than 70 years in the post-CREST (2011-2014) compared with the pre-CREST (2007-2010) era. Design, Setting, and Participants: All adults older than 70 years undergoing carotid revascularization in the United States from 2007 to 2014 were retrospectively identified from the 2007-2014 National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision procedural codes. From 61 324 882 unweighted hospitalizations contained in the 2007-2014 National Inpatient Sample, 494 733 weighted carotid revascularization admissions in adults older than 70 years were identified using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision procedural codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of CAS performed in all age groups over time was estimated and multivariable-adjusted models were used to compare the odds of receiving CAS in the pre-CREST with those in the post-CREST era in adults older than 70 years.
Results: A total of 41.8% of all patients were women, and mean (SE) age at presentation was 78.1 (0.03) years. A total of 16.3% of CAS and 10.1% of CEA procedures were performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis. The proportion of patients older than 70 years receiving CAS increased from 11.9% in the pre-CREST to 13.8% in the post-CREST era (P = .005). In multivariable models, the odds of receiving CAS increased by 13% in all patients older than 70 years in the post-CREST compared with the pre-CREST period (odds ratio [OR], 1.13, 95% CI, 1.00-1.28, P = .04), including symptomatic women (OR, 1.31, 1.05-1.65, P = .02). Symptomatic stenosis (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52; P < .001), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.63; P < .001), and peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.43; P < .001) were associated with higher odds of CAS; comorbid hypertension (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74; P < .001), smoking (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P < .001), and weekend admission (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88; P < .001) were negatively associated with the odds of CAS. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite concerns for higher periprocedural complications with CAS in elderly patients, the odds of CAS increased in the post-CREST compared with pre-CREST era in patients older than 70 years, including symptomatic women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29204653      PMCID: PMC5833495          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  27 in total

1.  Age differential between outcomes of carotid angioplasty and stent placement and carotid endarterectomy in general practice.

Authors:  Rakesh Khatri; Saqib A Chaudhry; Gabriela Vazquez; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Ameer E Hassan; M Fareed K Suri; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Catch-22: Carotid stenting is safe and effective (Food and Drug Administration) but is it reasonable and necessary (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)?

Authors:  Christopher J White; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Influence of sex on outcomes of stenting versus endarterectomy: a subgroup analysis of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Helmi L Lutsep; Ariane Mackey; Bart M Demaerschalk; Albert D Sam; Nicole R Gonzales; Alice J Sheffet; Jenifer H Voeks; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Effect of CREST Findings on Carotid Revascularization Practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Jiaquan Fan; Giuseppe Lanzino; David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Timing of Carotid Revascularization Procedures After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Michael Reznik; Hooman Kamel; Gino Gialdini; Ankur Pandya; Babak B Navi; Ajay Gupta
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Christopher J White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery.

Authors:  Travis M Dumont; Anand I Rughani
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: an international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement.

Authors:  Anne L Abbott; Mark A Adelman; Andrei V Alexandrov; P Alan Barber; Henry J M Barnett; Jonathan Beard; Peter Bell; Martin Björck; David Blacker; Leo H Bonati; Martin M Brown; Clifford J Buckley; Richard P Cambria; John E Castaldo; Anthony J Comerota; E Sander Connolly; Ronald L Dalman; Alun H Davies; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Rishad Faruqi; Thomas E Feasby; Gustav Fraedrich; Peter Gloviczki; Graeme J Hankey; Robert E Harbaugh; Eitan Heldenberg; Michael G Hennerici; Michael D Hill; Timothy J Kleinig; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Wesley S Moore; Ross Naylor; Andrew Nicolaides; Kosmas I Paraskevas; David M Pelz; James W Prichard; Grant Purdie; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Peter A Ringleb; Thomas Riles; Peter M Rothwell; Peter Sandercock; Henrik Sillesen; J David Spence; Francesco Spinelli; Jonathon Sturm; Aaron Tan; Ankur Thapar; Frank J Veith; Tissa Wijeratne; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014.

Authors:  Mohamad A Hussain; Muhammad Mamdani; Jack V Tu; Gustavo Saposnik; Zeyad Khoushhal; Badr Aljabri; Subdoh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  3 in total

1.  Alcohol withdrawal is associated with poorer outcome in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Emmanuel O Akano; Fadar Oliver Otite; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Current understanding of chronic total occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Baofeng Xu; Chao Li; Yunbao Guo; Kan Xu; Yi Yang; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  Snapshot of current carotid artery stenting practice and accreditation in the USA.

Authors:  David Sacks; Mary Beth Farrell; Barry T Katzen; Mary Lally; Jon S Matsumura; Nancy Merrill
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.