Literature DB >> 22070935

Age differential between outcomes of carotid angioplasty and stent placement and carotid endarterectomy in general practice.

Rakesh Khatri1, Saqib A Chaudhry, Gabriela Vazquez, Gustavo J Rodriguez, Ameer E Hassan, M Fareed K Suri, Adnan I Qureshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data derived from prospective randomized clinical trials suggest differential comparative benefit between carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS) placement and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in various age strata. We sought to investigate the impact of age on outcomes of CAS and CEA in general practice.
METHODS: We analyzed the data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which is representative of all admissions in the United States from 2005 to 2008. The primary end point was occurrence of stroke, cardiac complications, or death during the postprocedural period. Outcomes of interest were compared between patients aged ≥70 years and <70 years, undergoing CEA and CAS. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of age on occurrence of postoperative stroke, cardiac complications, or death. Covariates included in the logistic regression were patient's age, gender, comorbid conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and renal failure; symptom status (symptomatic vs asymptomatic status), and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the total 495,331 estimated patients who received treatment for CAD during the study period, 88% underwent CEA and the remaining 12% underwent CAS. Of the total procedures, 41% of the procedures were performed in patients aged <70 years compared to the remaining 59% that were performed among patients aged ≥70 years. For patients undergoing CAS, age ≥70 years was an important predictor of postoperative stroke (P = .0025; odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.5) and cardiac complications postprocedure (P = .045; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6). For patients undergoing CEA, age ≥70 years was associated with higher cardiac complications (P < .001; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7) and higher postoperative mortality risk (P = .0008; OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) compared to patients aged <70 years. The increased risk of composite end point (postoperative stroke/cardiac complications/mortality) among patients aged ≥70 years was a significant factor for patients undergoing either CAS or CEA (OR of 1.3 for both procedures).
CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that most CAS and CEAs are performed in patients aged ≥70 years in general practice, and higher rates of postoperative complications are observed among these patients regardless of procedure choice.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070935      PMCID: PMC5654716          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

1.  Has evidence changed practice?: appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials.

Authors:  E A Halm; S Tuhrim; J J Wang; M Rojas; E L Hannan; M R Chassin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  National trends in utilization and postprocedure outcomes for carotid artery revascularization 2005 to 2007.

Authors:  Mohammad H Eslami; James T McPhee; Jessica P Simons; Andres Schanzer; Louis M Messina
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Jonathan L Halperin; Suhny Abbara; J Michael Bacharach; John D Barr; Ruth L Bush; Christopher U Cates; Mark A Creager; Susan B Fowler; Gary Friday; Vicki S Hertzberg; E Bruce McIff; Wesley S Moore; Peter D Panagos; Thomas S Riles; Robert H Rosenwasser; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics.

Authors:  D E Wennberg; F L Lucas; J D Birkmeyer; C E Bredenberg; E S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis.

Authors:  R J Wityk; D Lehman; M Klag; J Coresh; H Ahn; B Litt
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy in patients with ipsilateral symptoms.

Authors:  L B Goldstein; D C McCrory; P B Landsman; G P Samsa; M Ancukiewicz; E Z Oddone; D B Matchar
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The CAPTURE registry: analysis of strokes resulting from carotid artery stenting in the post approval setting: timing, location, severity, and type.

Authors:  Ronald Fairman; William A Gray; Andrea P Scicli; Olivia Wilburn; Patrick Verta; Richard Atkinson; Jay S Yadav; Mark Wholey; L Nelson Hopkins; Rod Raabe; Stanley Barnwell; Richard Green
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.

Authors:  William A Gray; Jay S Yadav; Patrick Verta; Andrea Scicli; Ronald Fairman; Mark Wholey; L Nelson Hopkins; Richard Atkinson; Rod Raabe; Stanley Barnwell; Richard Green
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection.

Authors:  Paul T L Chiam; Gary S Roubin; Sriram S Iyer; Richard M Green; Daniel E Soffer; Christina Brennan; Jiri J Vitek
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Carotid artery stenting: review of technique and update of recent literature.

Authors:  Sun Ho Ahn; Ethan A Prince; Gregory J Dubel
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  Fadar Oliver Otite; Priyank Khandelwal; Amer M Malik; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Factors Associated with Increased Rates of Post-procedural Stroke or Death following Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

Review 4.  Future management of carotid stenosis: role of urgent carotid interventions in the acutely symptomatic carotid patient and best medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid disease.

Authors:  Hernan A Bazan; Taylor A Smith; Melissa J Donovan; W Charles Sternbergh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.

Authors:  Anne L Abbott
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Protective Effect of Low-dose Sevoflurane Inhalation and Propofol Anesthesia on the Myocardium after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Yan-Hong Li; Tian-Long Wang; Hua Feng; Bing Cai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Is Associated With Age But Not Sex in Patients Treated With Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Stenosis in Routine Practice: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Statutory Quality Assurance Database From 2009 to 2014.

Authors:  Sofie Schmid; Pavlos Tsantilas; Christoph Knappich; Michael Kallmayer; Thomas König; Thorben Breitkreuz; Alexander Zimmermann; Andreas Kuehnl; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Factors Influencing Decision Making for Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting in the Very Elderly.

Authors:  Sung Hyuk Heo; Cheryl D Bushnell
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Accurate classification of carotid endarterectomy indication using physician claims and hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Stephen van Gaal; Arshia Alimohammadi; Amy Y X Yu; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Wei Zhang; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.