Literature DB >> 25840953

Effect of CREST Findings on Carotid Revascularization Practice in the United States.

Jennifer S McDonald1, Robert J McDonald2, Jiaquan Fan3, Giuseppe Lanzino4, David F Kallmes5, Harry J Cloft5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to measure the impact of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) findings on clinical practice by studying trends in carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) utilization before and after publication of CREST in a large US multihospital database.
METHODS: The Premier Perspective Database was used to identify inpatient CEA and CAS procedures performed from January 2006 to March 2013. Patients were subclassified by age (<70/≥70 years) and presentation (symptomatic/asymptomatic). CEA and CAS volumes were compared before and after the publication of CREST (July 2010) using an interrupted time series model.
RESULTS: A total of 121,157 CEA and 18,503 CAS procedures performed at 445 medical centers were identified. There was no significant change observed in the overall number of CEA procedures performed after CREST publication relative to the pre-existing trend (P = .08); however, there was a significant increase in the overall number of CAS procedures performed (delta of 40 cases, P = .0179) in patients aged younger than 70 years (delta of 24 cases, P = .0008), 70 years or older (delta of 25 cases, P = .0047), and asymptomatic patients (delta of 39 cases, P = .0159). The overall percentage of CEA procedures performed in relation to all revascularization procedures was significantly lower after CREST publication overall (delta, -1.5%; P = .041) for patients aged younger than 70 years (delta, -2.4%; P < .0001) and asymptomatic patients (delta, -1.5%; P = .035).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of US hospitals, performance of CAS significantly increased after the publication of the CREST study.
Copyright © 2015 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid stenosis; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25840953     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  5 in total

1.  National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  Fadar Oliver Otite; Priyank Khandelwal; Amer M Malik; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Sibu P Saha; Subhajit Saha; Krishna S Vyas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014.

Authors:  Mohamad A Hussain; Muhammad Mamdani; Jack V Tu; Gustavo Saposnik; Zeyad Khoushhal; Badr Aljabri; Subdoh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Clinical results of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Tuba Akinci; Eda Derle; Seda Kibaroğlu; Ali Harman; Feride Kural; Pınar Cınar; Munire Kilinc; Hakki T Akay; Ufuk Can; Ulku S Benli
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.906

5.  De-adoption and exnovation in the use of carotid revascularization: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Jonathan Skinner; Daniel Gottlieb; Philip Goodney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.