Literature DB >> 20424081

Attention and the evolution of Hollywood film.

James E Cutting1, Jordan E DeLong, Christine E Nothelfer.   

Abstract

Reaction times exhibit a spectral patterning known as 1/f, and these patterns can be thought of as reflecting time-varying changes in attention. We investigated the shot structure of Hollywood films to determine if these same patterns are found. We parsed 150 films with release dates from 1935 to 2005 into their sequences of shots and then analyzed the pattern of shot lengths in each film. Autoregressive and power analyses showed that, across that span of 70 years, shots became increasingly more correlated in length with their neighbors and created power spectra approaching 1/f. We suggest, as have others, that 1/f patterns reflect world structure and mental process. Moreover, a 1/f temporal shot structure may help harness observers' attention to the narrative of a film.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424081     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610361679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  15 in total

1.  The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Sidika Kajtezovic; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation.

Authors:  Joseph P Magliano; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-10-04

Review 3.  Narrative theory and the dynamics of popular movies.

Authors:  James E Cutting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

4.  Quicker, faster, darker: Changes in Hollywood film over 75 years.

Authors:  James E Cutting; Kaitlin L Brunick; Jordan E Delong; Catalina Iricinschi; Ayse Candan
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-09-30

5.  Perception while watching movies: Effects of physical screen size and scene type.

Authors:  Tom Troscianko; Timothy S Meese; Stephen Hinde
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-07-05

6.  An implementation of Bubble Magnification did not improve the video comprehension of individuals with central vision loss.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Stephanie M Reeves; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Facial expression, size, and clutter: Inferences from movie structure to emotion judgments and back.

Authors:  James E Cutting; Kacie L Armstrong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The evolution of pace in popular movies.

Authors:  James E Cutting
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-19

9.  Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Russell L Woods
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Visual motherese? Signal-to-noise ratios in toddler-directed television.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Tim J Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.