Literature DB >> 29203975

A Prospective Study of Distal Microscopic Spread in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Pinned and Unpinned Specimen.

Aravind S Kapali1, K Chandramohan2, A V Jayasudha3.   

Abstract

The most important margin in determining the prognosis of rectal cancer is circumferential resection margin (CRM). But, the type of surgery is determined by distal rectal margin (DRM), whether sphincter saving procedure is possible or patient needs an abdominoperineal resection. There are no standardized uniform guidelines for measurement of DRM. The purpose of this study is to assess the distal microscopic spread beyond gross margin after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in rectal cancers, the factors influencing the distal microscopic spread, the shrinkage of the distal margin in pinned and unpinned fresh and fixed specimen, and to find out the best method of measurement of distal rectal margin. A prospective analytical study was conducted from May 2013 through February 2015 in 47 cases of carcinoma rectum (both AR and APR) who had received neoadjuvant CCRT. Fresh specimen was collected within 30 min of specimen retrieval and a longitudinal cut was made in the distal margin of all specimens. One side of the specimen was pinned onto a cork board and the other side was left unpinned. Measurements were made from the distal end of clinical gross tumor. DRM was determined in both pinned and unpinned sides in fresh and fixed specimen. Of the 47 patients, 2 patients (4.2%) had small focus of tumor beyond gross margins, 1 at 6 mm and another at 3.5 mm on the unpinned side. The average margin for fresh and fixed pinned specimens was 3.67 and 3.47 cm, respectively, with percentage shrinkage of 5.4% for the pinned specimens. The average margin for fresh and fixed unpinned specimens was 3.32 and 2.84 cm, respectively, with percentage shrinkage of 14.4% for the unpinned specimens. Six patients (12.7%) had complete pathological response. Correlation of distal margin was better in pinned specimen. A correction factor of 15% for shrinkage needs to be taken into account while assessing unpinned specimen. Only in 4.2% of patients, there was distal submucosal spread beyond gross margin. Long-term follow up is required for assessing adequacy of DRM post neoadjuvant CCRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal rectal margin; Formaline fixation; Pinned and unpinned specimen

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203975      PMCID: PMC5705501          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0637-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  23 in total

1.  Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; A Soman; J Sacksner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Acceptance of a 5-mm distal bowel resection margin for rectal cancer: is it safe?

Authors:  A Rutkowski; M P Nowacki; M Chwalinski; J Oledzki; M Bednarczyk; P Liszka-Dalecki; A Gornicki; K Bujko
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer.

Authors:  D F de Haas-Kock; C G Baeten; J J Jager; J A Langendijk; L J Schouten; A Volovics; J W Arends
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; K Fujimoto; T Uchida; K Okuno
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luigi Zorcolo; Alan S Rosman; Angelo Restivo; Michele Pisano; Giuseppe R Nigri; Alessandro Fancellu; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy?

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Lei Lian; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-MM distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients.

Authors:  S Andreola; E Leo; F Belli; G Bonfanti; G Sirizzotti; P Greco; F Valvo; G Tomasic; G F Gallino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Role of intraoperative frozen section for assessing distal resection margin after anterior resection.

Authors:  Rachel M Gomes; Manish Bhandare; Ashwin Desouza; Munita Bal; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer.

Authors:  N Scott; P Jackson; T al-Jaberi; M F Dixon; P Quirke; P J Finan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  An-Sofie Verrijssen; José Guillem; Rodrigo Perez; Krzysztof Bujko; Nathalie Guedj; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ruud Houben; Danny Goudkade; Jarno Melenhorst; Jeroen Buijsen; Ben Vanneste; Heike I Grabsch; Murillo Bellezzo; Gabriel Paiva Fonseca; Frank Verhaegen; Maaike Berbee; Evert J Van Limbergen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.280

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.