BACKGROUND: Complete pathologic response (CPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (combined modality treatment, CMT) for rectal cancer seems associated with improved survival compared to partial or no response (NPR). However, previous reports have been limited by small sample size and single-institution design. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to detect studies comparing long-term results of patients with CPR and NPR after CMT for rectal cancer. Variables were pooled only if evaluated by 3 or more studies. Study end points included rates of CPR, local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), 5-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Twelve studies (1,913 patients) with rectal cancer treated with CMT were included. CPR was observed in 300 patients (15.6%). CPR and NPR patient groups were similar with respect to age, sex, tumor size, distance of tumor from the anus, and stage of disease before treatment. Median follow-up ranged from 23 to 46 months. CPR patients had lower rates of LR [0.7% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.90, P = 0.03], DR (5.3% vs. 24.1%; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.0001), and simultaneous LR + DR (0.7% vs. 4.8%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.01). OS was 92.9% for CPR versus 73.4% for NPR (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.84-7.22, P = 0.002), and DFS was 86.9% versus 63.9% (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.62-7.72, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CPR after CMT for rectal cancer is associated with improved local and distal control as well as better OS and DFS.
BACKGROUND: Complete pathologic response (CPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (combined modality treatment, CMT) for rectal cancer seems associated with improved survival compared to partial or no response (NPR). However, previous reports have been limited by small sample size and single-institution design. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to detect studies comparing long-term results of patients with CPR and NPR after CMT for rectal cancer. Variables were pooled only if evaluated by 3 or more studies. Study end points included rates of CPR, local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), 5-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Twelve studies (1,913 patients) with rectal cancer treated with CMT were included. CPR was observed in 300 patients (15.6%). CPR and NPRpatient groups were similar with respect to age, sex, tumor size, distance of tumor from the anus, and stage of disease before treatment. Median follow-up ranged from 23 to 46 months. CPRpatients had lower rates of LR [0.7% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.90, P = 0.03], DR (5.3% vs. 24.1%; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.0001), and simultaneous LR + DR (0.7% vs. 4.8%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.01). OS was 92.9% for CPR versus 73.4% for NPR (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.84-7.22, P = 0.002), and DFS was 86.9% versus 63.9% (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.62-7.72, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS:CPR after CMT for rectal cancer is associated with improved local and distal control as well as better OS and DFS.
Authors: C A Kim; S Ahmed; S Ahmed; B Brunet; H Chalchal; R Deobald; C Doll; M P Dupre; V Gordon; R M Lee-Ying; H Lim; D Liu; J M Loree; J P McGhie; K Mulder; J Park; B Yip; R P Wong; A Zaidi Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Felipe A Calvo; Virginia Morillo; Marcos Santos; Javier Serrano; Marina Gomez-Espí; Marcos Rodriguez; Emilio Del Vale; Jose Luis Gracia-Sabrido; Carlos Ferrer; Claudio Sole Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: R Vera; M Gomez Dorronsoro; S Lopez-Ben; A Viudez; B Queralt; I Hernandez; M R Ortiz-Duran; C Zazpe; J Soriano; I Amat; J Herrera Cabezón; E Diaz; A Codina-Barreras; X Hernandez-Yagüe; A Quera; J Figueras Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.405