| Literature DB >> 29202780 |
Vegard Bruun Wyller1,2, Chinh Bkrong Nguyen3, Judith Anita Ludviksen4,5, Tom Eirik Mollnes4,5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent and disabling condition among adolescent. The disease mechanisms are unknown. Previous studies have suggested elevated plasma levels of several cytokines, but a recent meta-analysis of 38 articles found that of 77 different cytokines measured in plasma, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) was the only one that was elevated in patients compared to controls in a sufficient number of articles. In the present study we therefore compared the plasma levels of the three TGF-β isoforms in adolescent CFS patients and healthy controls. In addition, the study explored associations between TGF-β levels, neuroendocrine markers, clinical markers and differentially expressed genes within the CFS group.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Inflammation; Transforming growth factor beta
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29202780 PMCID: PMC5716371 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1350-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Demographic characteristics
| CFS patients (n = 120) | Healthy controls (n = 68) | p valuec | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background | |||||
| Female gender | 88 | 73 | 46 | 68 | 0.563 |
| Age (years) | 15.4 | 1.6 | 15.1 | 1.6 | 0.179 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.5 | 4.2 | 20.6 | 3.7 | 0.119 |
| Disease duration (months) | 18 | 4–104 | n/a | ||
| Adheres to the Fukuda criteria of CFSa
| 88 | 73 | n/a | ||
| Adheres to the Canada 2003-criteria of CFSb
| 46 | 38 | n/a | ||
| Immune, autonomic and neuroendocrine markers | |||||
| Serum C-reactive protein (mg/l) | 0.43 | 0.96 | 0.35 | 0.46 |
|
| Heart rate variability, LF power (abs) | 481 | 772 | 682 | 1514 |
|
| Heart rate variability, HF power (abs) | 788 | 1835 | 1058 | 1837 | 0.070 |
| Heart rate variability, LF/HF-ratio | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.38 | 0.792 |
| Plasma norepinephrine (pmol/l) | 1991 | 783 | 1483 | 422 |
|
| Plasma epinephrine (pmol/l) | 308 | 131 | 265 | 95 |
|
| Plasma cortisol (nmol/l) | 367 | 143 | 351 | 150 | 0.460 |
| Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol) | 12.3 | 5.8 | 10.8 | 5.8 | 0.102 |
| Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.649 |
| Urine cortisol/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol) | 3.4 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 6.0 |
|
| Clinical makers | |||||
| Symptoms of post-exertional malaise (total score) | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
|
| Inflammatory symptoms (total score) | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
|
| Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (total score) | 19.3 | 6.1 | 8.7 | 4.6 |
|
| Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (total score) | 17.4 | 10.0 | 6.4 | 7.8 |
|
| Spielberger state-trait anxiety questionnaire (trait subscore) | 43.2 | 8.9 | 32.3 | 7.2 |
|
| Steps per day (number) | 4662 | 2386 | 10,293 | 3716 |
|
P values in italics indicate statistical significance
n/a not applicable, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, LF low-frequency power of heart rate variability, HF high-frequency power of heart rate variability
aCf. Ref. [35]
bCf. Ref. [33]
cStatistical comparison across CFS group and HC group are based upon Independent sample t test, Mann–Whitney test or Fisher exact test as appropriate
TGF-β isoforms across CFS patients (including Fukuda and Canada 2003-subgroups) and healthy controls
| CFS patients (n = 120) | p valuea | Healthy controls (n = 68) | CFS, Fukuda subgroup (n = 88) | p valuea | CFS, Canada 2003 subgroup (n = 46) | p valuea | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma TGF-β1 (pg/ml) | 4927 | 5157 | 0.482 | 5692 | 6350 | 4944 | 4276 | 0.599 | 4880 | 6247 | 0.831 |
| Plasma TGF-β2 (pg/ml) | 758 | 262 | 0.928 | 754 | 278 | 712 | 246 | 0.809 | 780 | 252 | 0.621 |
| Plasma TGF-β3 (pg/ml) | 230 | 227 | 0.901 | 251 | 250 | 230 | 208 | 0.990 | 243 | 254 | 0.760 |
TGF transforming growth factor beta, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range
aCompared with healthy controls. Statistical comparisons across groups are based upon Independent sample t test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate
Fig. 1Multiple linear regression models exploring associations between neuroendocrine markers and isoforms of TGF-β in CFS patients (a) and healthy controls (b). Significant associations are indicated with a continuous arrow, whereas associations close to the level of significance are indicated with a dotted arrow. P-NorEpi plasma norepinephrine, P-Epi plasma epinephrine, P-Cortisol plasma cortisol, U-NorEpi urine norepinephrine-to-creatinine ratio, U-Epi urine epinephrine:creatinine ratio, U-Cortisol urine cortisol:creatinine ratio, P-TGF plasma transforming growth factor
Multiple linear regression models for neuroendocrine markers and plasma TGF-β in CFS patients with high fatigue score (≥ 20), CFS patients with low fatigue score (< 20), and healthy controls
| CFS patients, high fatigue score (n = 62)b | CFS patients, low fatigue score (n = 54)b | Healthy controls (n = 68) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||||||||
| Dependent variable | |||||||||
| Plasma TGF-β1a | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 |
| Independent variables | |||||||||
| Plasma cortisol | 1.9 × 10−3 (0.18 to 3.5 × 10−3) |
| 0.17 | 0.26 × 10−3 (− 1.6 to 2.1 x 10−3) | 0.780 | 0.12 | − 0.19 × 10−3 (− 1.9 to 1.5 × 10−3) | 0.825 | 0.07 |
| Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa | 0.99 (0.20 to 1.8) |
| 0.60 (0.01 to 1.2) |
| 0.62 (− 0.06 to 1.3) | 0.071 | |||
| Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa | − 0.65 (− 0.65 to − 0.06) |
| − 0.39 (− 0.77 to − 0.02) |
| 0.004 (− 0.47 to 0.48) | 0.987 | |||
| Model 2 | |||||||||
| Dependent variable | |||||||||
| Plasma TGF-β2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 |
| Independent variables | |||||||||
| Plasma cortisol | 0.64 (0.22 to 1.1) |
| 0.22 | 0.07 (− 0.49 to 0.62) | 0.814 | 0.12 | − 0.01 (− 0.49 to 0.46) | 0.950 | 0.05 |
| Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa | 248 (50 to 447) |
| 133 (− 44 to 311) | 0.136 | 160 (− 28 to 349) | 0.094 | |||
| Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa | − 161 (− 308 to − 14) |
| − 132 (− 246 to − 18) |
| − 16 (− 148 to 115) | 0.806 | |||
| Model 3 | |||||||||
| Dependent variable | |||||||||
| Plasma TGF-β3a | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 | B (CI) | p value | R2 |
| Independent variables | |||||||||
| Plasma cortisol | 2.0 × 10−3 (0.60 to 3.4 × 10−3) |
| 0.20 | 0.17 × 10−3 (− 1.6 to 1.9 × 10−3) | 0.851 | 0.11 | − 0.4 × 10−3 (− 1.8 to 0.99 × 10−3) | 0.565 | 0.07 |
| Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa | 0.78 (0.12 to 1.4) |
| 0.40 (− 0.17 to 1.0) | 0.164 | 0.50 (− 0.06 to 1.1) | 0.076 | |||
| Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa | − 0.52 (− 1.0 to − 0.03) |
| − 0.41 (− 0.77 to − 0.05) |
| − 0.01 (− 0.40 to 0.38) | 0.964 | |||
P values in italics indicate statistical significance
B regression coefficient (unstandardized), CI confidence interval, R explained variance of the dependent variable
aThe ln-transformed variable was used (better approximation to a normal distribution)
bFatigue score was missing from 4 CFS patients
Fig. 2Multiple linear regression models in a subgroup of CFS patients (n = 29). a Previous established associations between blood monocyte count and plasma cortisol, and the expression in whole blood of the genes TNFRSF13C (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13C) and CXCR5 (C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5) (Nguyen et al. [13]). b The associations after introducing TGF-β3 as a mediating variable in the regression model. Significant associations are indicated with a continuous arrow, associations close to the level of significance are indicated with a dotted arrow. B-Mono blood monocyte count, P-Cortisol plasma cortisol, P-TGF plasma transforming growth factor